Statistical methods on detecting differentially expressed genes for RNA-seq data

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2011, Pages

  Chen, Zhongxue ^a   Liu, Jianzhong ^b   Ng, Hon K T ^c   Nadarajah, Saralees ^d   Kaufman, Howard L ^e   Yang, Jack Y ^f   Deng, Youping ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b Chem21 Group Inc   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METHODOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA;

EID: 84255175600     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-S3-S1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bullard JH, Purdom E, Hansen KD, Dudoit S. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:94. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-94, 2838869, 20167110.
2. Ingolia NT, Ghaemmaghami S, Newman JR, Weissman JS. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 2009, 324(5924):218-223. 10.1126/science.1168978, 2746483, 19213877.
3. Marioni JC, Mason CE, Mane SM, Stephens M, Gilad Y. RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res 2008, 18(9):1509-1517. 10.1101/gr.079558.108, 2527709, 18550803.
4. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10(1):57-63. 10.1038/nrg2484, 2949280, 19015660.
5. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 2010, 11(3):R25. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25, 2864565, 20196867.
6. Bloom JS, Khan Z, Kruglyak L, Singh M, Caudy AA. Measuring differential gene expression by short read sequencing: quantitative comparison to 2-channel gene expression microarrays. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:221. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-221, 2686739, 19435513.
7. Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Zhang X. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26(1):136-138. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp612, 19855105.
8. Robinson MD, Smyth GK. Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(21):2881-2887. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm453, 17881408.
9. Wu Z, Jenkins BD, Rynearson TA, Dyhrman ST, Saito MA, Mercier M, Whitney LP. Empirical bayes analysis of sequencing-based transcriptional profiling without replicates. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:564. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-564, 3098101, 21080965.
10. Gu K, Ng HK, Tang ML, Schucany WR. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates. Biom J 2008, 50(2):283-298. 10.1002/bimj.200710403, 18311854.
11. Ng HK, Tang ML. Testing the equality of two Poisson means using the rate ratio. Stat Med 2005, 24(6):955-965. 10.1002/sim.1949, 15532090.
12. Ng HKT, Gu K, Tang ML. A comparative study of tests for the difference of two Poisson means. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2007, 51:3085-3099.
13. Huffman MD. An improved approximate two-sample Poisson test. Applied Statistics 1984, 33:224-226.
14. Oshlack A, Wakefield MJ. Transcript length bias in RNA-seq data confounds systems biology. Biol Direct 2009, 4:14. 10.1186/1745-6150-4-14, 2678084, 19371405.
15. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 2010, 11(2):R14. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14, 2872874, 20132535.
16. Przyborowski J, Wilenski H. Homogeneity of results in testing samples from Poisson series. Biometrika 1940, 31:313-323.