Coprocessing of cellulose II with amorphous silicon dioxide: Effect of silicification on the powder and tableting properties

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 209-226

  Rojas, John ^a   Kumar, Vijay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulose II; Coprocessed excipient; Direct compression; Silicon dioxide

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DRUG GRANULATION; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; POWDER; SPHERONIZATION; SPRAY DRYING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TABLET FORMULATION; WATER ABSORPTION; WETTABILITY;

CELLULOSE; DRUG COMPOUNDING; EXCIPIENTS; PARTICLE SIZE; POWDERS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TABLETS;

EID: 84255167524     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: 15205762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2011.597400     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Marwaha M, Sandhu D, Marwaha R. (2010). Coprocessing of excipients: A review on excipient development for improved tableting performance. Int J Appl Pharm, 2:41-47.
2. Díaz CC, Villafuerte L. (2010). Surrogate functionality of celluloses as tablet excipients Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm, 36:1422-1435.
3. Block LH, Moreton RC, Apte SP, Wendt RH, Munson EJ, Creekmore JR. (2009). Co-processed Excipients. Pharm forum, 35:1026-1028.
4. Reimerdes D. (1993).The near future of tablet excipients. Manuf Chem, 64:14-15.
5. Lerk C, Bolhuis G, De Boer A. (1974).comparative evaluation of excipients for direct compression, II. Pharm Weekbl, 109:945-955.
6. Jain SP, Singh PP, Amin PD. (2010). Alternative extrusionspheronization aids. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 36:1364-1376.
7. Aljaberi A, Chatterji A, Shah NH, Sandhu HK. (2009). Functional performance of silicified microcrystalline cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose: a case study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 35:1066-1071.
8. Nachaegari SK, Bansal AK. (2004). Coprocessed excipients for solid dosage forms. Pharm Technol, 28:52-65.
9. Chow K, Tong HH, Lum S, Chow AH. (2008). Engineering of pharmaceutical materials: an industrial perspective. j Pharm Sci, 97:2855-2877.
10. Kumar V, de la Luz Reus-Medina M, Yang D. (2002). Preparation, characterization, and tabletting properties of a new cellulosebased pharmaceutical aid. Int j Pharm, 235:129-140. (Pubitemid 34185444)
11. Reus M, Lenz M, Kumar V, Leuenberger H. (2004).comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of UICEL and Commercial Microcrystalline and Powdered Celluloses. J Pharm Pharmacol, 56:951-958.
12. M., Reus. Preparation, characterization and tableting properties of cellulose II powders. (2005). PhD Dissertation. The University of Iowa. Iowa City.
13. de la Luz Reus Medina M, Kumar V. (2006). Evaluation of cellulose II powders as a potential multifunctional excipient in tablet formulations. Int j Pharm, 322:31-35. (Pubitemid 44331522)
14. Van den Berg C. (1984). Description of water activity of foods for engineering purposes by means of the GAB model of sorption. Eng Food, 1:311-321.
15. Adamson A, Gast PG. (1997). Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. 6th ed. New York. Wiley-Interscience.
16. Edge S, Belu AM, Potter UJ, Steele DF, Young PM, Price R et al. (2002). Chemical characterisation of sodium starch glycolate particles. Int j Pharm, 240:67-78. (Pubitemid 34607703)
17. Edge S, Steele DF, Staniforth JN, Chen A, Woodcock PM. (2002). Powder compaction properties of sodium starch glycolate disintegrants. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 28:989-999.
18. Fell JT, Newton JM. (1968). The tensile strength of lactose tablets. j Pharm Pharmacol, 20:657-659.
19. Lanz M. (2005). Pharmaceutical powder technology: Towards a science based understanding of the behavior of powder systems. Basel: University of Basel. PhD dissertation, 1-162.
20. Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T, Heinze U. (1998).comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry: Functionalization of Cellulose. New York. John Wiley & sons.
21. Kothari SH, Kumar V, Banker GS. (2002).comparative evaluations of powder and mechanical properties of low crystallinity celluloses, microcrystalline celluloses, and powdered celluloses. Int j Pharm, 232:69-80. (Pubitemid 34076755)
22. Tobyn MJ, McCarthy GP, Staniforth JN, Edge S. (1998). Physicochemical comparison between microcrystalline cellulose and silicified microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm, 169:183-194. (Pubitemid 28345254)
23. Edge S, Steele FD, Tobyn M, Staniforth JN. (1999). Polysacharide engineering: Silicified microcrystalline cellulose as a novel highfunctionality pharmaceutical material in: ACS Symposium series # 737:Polysacharadides applications: cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. American Chemical Society. Washington D.C. 368-376.
24. Portmann C, Ziolko T, Wiprachtiger A, Kleinhan S, Schonenberger G. (2007). The Laboratory Assistant. Switzerland. Buchi Labortechnik.
25. Cabot. CAB-O-SIL Fume silica properties and functions. Cabot (1987). CGen-8:1-36.
26. Zhang Y, Law Y, Chakrabarti S. (2003). Physical properties and compact analysis of commonly used direct compression binders. aaps Pharmscitech, 4:E62.