Performance of angiographic, electrocardiographic and MRI methods to assess the area at risk in acute myocardial infarction

Heart

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-115

  Versteylen, Mathijs O ^a   Bekkers, Sebastiaan C A M ^a   Smulders, Martijn W ^a   Winkens, Bjorn ^a   Mihl, Casper ^a   Winkens, Mark H M ^a   Leiner, Tim ^a   Waltenberger, Johannes L ^a   Kim, Raymond J ^b   Gorgels, Anton P M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABCIXIMAB; ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ADENOSINE; CLOPIDOGREL; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; HEPARIN;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDIAL SURFACE AREA; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84155163261     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300185     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anon. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 1993;329:673-82.
2. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, et al. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56:786-94. (Pubitemid 8235183)
3. Christian TF, Schwartz RS, Gibbons RJ. Determinants of infarct size in reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992;86:81-90.
4. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992-2002. (Pubitemid 29529292)
5. Sinusas AJ, Trautman KA, Bergin JD, et al. Quantification of area at risk during coronary occlusion and degree of myocardial salvage after reperfusion with technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile. Circulation 1990;82:1424-37.
6. Gibbons RJ, Verani MS, Behrenbeck T, et al. Feasibility of tomographic 99mTc-hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile imaging for the assessment of myocardial area at risk and the effect of treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1989;80:1277-86. (Pubitemid 19282516)
7. Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J, et al. Use of initial ST-segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:749-53. (Pubitemid 18089286)
8. Alderman EL, Stadius M. The angiographic definitions of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Coron Artery Dis 1992;3:1189-207.
9. Graham MM, Faris PD, Ghali WA, et al. Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort. Am Heart J 2001;142:254-61. (Pubitemid 32706283)
10. Jennings RB. Effect of reperfusion late in the phase of reversible ischemic injury changes in cell volume, electrolytes, metabolites, and infrastructure. Circ Res 1985;56:262-78. (Pubitemid 15131388)
11. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, et al. Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation 2006;113:1865-70. (Pubitemid 43739398)
12. Tilak GS, Hsu LY, Hoyt RF Jr, et al. In vivo T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging can accurately determine the ischemic area at risk for 2-day-old nonreperfused myocardial infarction. Invest Radiol 2008;43:7-15.
13. Wright J, Adriaenssens T, Dymarkowski S, et al. Quantification of myocardial area at risk with T2-weighted CMR: comparison with contrast-enhanced CMR and coronary angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:825-31.
14. Ortiz Perez JT, Meyers SN, Lee DC, et al. Angiographic estimates of myocardium at risk during acute myocardial infarction: validation study using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1750-8. (Pubitemid 47227100)
15. Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedstrom E, et al. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:569-76.
16. Friedrich MG, Abdel Aty H, Taylor A, et al. The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1581-7. (Pubitemid 351508364)
17. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007;116:2634-53. (Pubitemid 350182388)
18. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, et al. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:587-92. (Pubitemid 15141963)
19. Anon. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932-6.
20. Lee JT, Ideker RE, Reimer KA. Myocardial infarct size and location in relation to the coronary vascular bed at risk in man. Circulation 1981;64:526-34. (Pubitemid 11061621)
21. Bondarenko O, Beek AM, Hofman MB, et al. Standardizing the definition of hyperenhancement in the quantitative assessment of infarct size and myocardial viability using delayed contrast-enhanced CMR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:481-5. (Pubitemid 40563339)
22. Christian TF, Gibbons RJ, Clements IP, et al. Estimates of myocardium at risk and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiographic indexes with comparison to radionuclide and angiographic measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:388-93.
23. Anderson CI, Harrison DG, Stack NC, et al. Evaluation of serial QRS changes during acute inferior myocardial infarction using a QRS scoring system. Am J Cardiol 1983;52:252-6. (Pubitemid 13076463)
24. Haronian HL, Remetz MS, Sinusas AJ, et al. Myocardial risk area defined by technetium-99m sestamibi imaging during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: comparison with coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1033-43. (Pubitemid 23285752)
25. Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2470-9.
26. Berry C, Kellman P, Mancini C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging delineates the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:527-35.
27. Wince WB, Kim RJ. Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk-a risky business? Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:547-9.
28. Kellman P, Aletras AH, Mancini C, et al. T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:891-7. (Pubitemid 46709409)
29. Payne AR, Casey M, McClure J, et al. Bright-blood T2-weighted MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy than dark blood short tau inversion recovery MRI for detection of acute i and for assessment of the ischemic area-at-risk and myocardial salvage. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:210-19.
30. Ubachs JF, Engblom H, Erlinge D, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the myocardium at risk in acute reperfused myocardial infarction: comparison of T2-weighted imaging versus the circumferential endocardial extent of late gadolinium enhancement with transmural projection. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010;12:18.