Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading

Trials

Volumn 12, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bland, J Martin ^a   Altman, Douglas G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ageing; Alpha; Baseline; Comparison; Significance; Type I error; Within group

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEASUREMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REFERENCE DATABASE; SIMULATION; AGING; BACKACHE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MENORRHAGIA; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY;

AGING; BACK PAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MENORRHAGIA; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84055223606     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-264     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Watson REB, Ogden S, Cotterell LF, Bowden JJ, Bastrilles JY, Long SP, Griffiths CEM. A cosmetic 'anti-ageing' product improves photoaged skin: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2009, 161:419-426. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09216.x, 2774146, 19438432.
2. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 1986, 292:746-50. 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746, 1339793, 3082422.
3. The CONSORT Statement. , http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/
4. Bland JM. Evidence for an 'anti-ageing' product may not be so clear as it appears. Br J Dermatol 2009, 161:1207-1208. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09433.x, 19678818.
5. Bland M. Keep young and beautiful: evidence for an "anti-aging" product?. Significance 2009, 6:182-183.
6. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1991, London: Chapman and Hall.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Informed consent. BMJ 1993, 306:928. 1677353, 8490433.
8. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics 2000, Oxford: University Press.
9. Bland M, Peacock J. Statistical Questions in Evidence-based Medicine 2000, Oxford: University Press.
10. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG. Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 2010, 303:2058-2064. 10.1001/jama.2010.651, 20501928.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparisons within randomised groups can be very misleading. BMJ 2011, 342:d561. 10.1136/bmj.d561, 21551184.
12. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH. Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies 2009, Chichester: Wiley.
13. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 2001, 323:1123-1124. 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123, 1121605, 11701584.
14. Toulon P, Jacquot C, Capron L, Frydman MO, Vignon D, Aiach M. Antithrombin-III and heparin cofactor-II in patients with chronic-renal-failure undergoing regular hemodialysis. Thrombosis Haemostasis 1987, 57:263-268.
15. Quinn MW, Wild J, Dean HG, Hartley R, Rushforth JA, Puntis JW, Levene MI. Randomised double-blind controlled trial of effect of morphine on catecholamine concentrations in ventilated pre-term babies. Lancet 1993, 342:324-327. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91472-X, 8101584.
16. Bonnar J, Sheppard BL. Treatment of menorrhagia during menstruation: randomised controlled trial of ethamsylate, mefenamic acid, and tranexamic acid. BMJ 1996, 313:579-582. 10.1136/bmj.313.7057.579, 2352023, 8806245.
17. Kerrigan DD, Thevasagayam RS, Woods TO, McWelch I, Thomas WEG, Shorthouse AJ, Dennison AR. Who's afraid of informed consent?. BMJ 1993, 306:298-300. 10.1136/bmj.306.6873.298, 1676881, 8461646.
18. Grant DJ, Bishop-Miller J, Winchester DM, Anderson M, Faulkner S. A randomized comparative trial of acupuncture versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic back pain in the elderly. Pain 1999, 82:9-13. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00027-5, 10422654.
19. Altman DG. Comparability of randomized groups. Statistician 1985, 34:125-136.
20. Salvesen KA, Bakketeig LS, Eik-nes SH, Undheim JO, Okland O. Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8-9 years. Lancet 1992, 339:85-89. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90998-I, 1345870.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Regression towards the mean. BMJ 1994, 308:1499. 10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1499, 2540330, 8019287.
22. Altman DG, Doré CJ. Randomization and base-line comparisons in clinical-trials. Lancet 1990, 335:149-153. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90014-V, 1967441.
23. Vollenweider D, Boyd CM, Puhan MA. High prevalence of potential biases threatens the interpretation of trials in patients with chronic disease. BMC Med 2011, 9:73. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-73, 3141538, 21663701.
24. Nieuwenhuis S, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers BJ. Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nat Neurosci 2011, 14:1105-7. 10.1038/nn.2886, 21878926.
25. Huff D. How to Lie with Statistics 1954, London: Gollancz.