The future of modes of data collection

Public Opinion Quarterly

Volumn 75, Issue 5 SPEC. ISSUE, 2011, Pages 889-908

  Couper, Mick P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84055191615     PISSN: 0033362X     EISSN: 15375331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfr046     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. AAPOR. 2009. An Evaluation of the Methodology of the 2008 Pre-Election Primary Polls. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. www.aapor.org .
2. AAPOR. 2010a. AAPOR Report on Online Panels. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. www.aapor.org.
3. AAPOR. 2010b. New Considerations for Survey Researchers When Planning and Conducting RDD Telephone Surveys in the U.S. with Respondents Reached via Cell Phone Numbers. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research. www.aapor.org.
4. Beniger, James R. 1998. "Survey and Market Research Confront Their Futures on the World Wide Web" Public Opinion Quarterly 62:442-52.
5. Bergman, Lars R., Karl-Erik Kristiansson, Anita Olofsson, and Margaretha Säfström. 1994. "Decentralized CATI versus Paper and Pencil Interviewing: Effects on the Results in the Swedish Labor Force Surveys" Journal of Official Statistics 10(2):181-95.
6. Bhutta, Christine B. 2010. "Not by the Book: Facebook as a Sampling Frame" Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1721162.
7. Chang, Linchiat, and Jon A. Krosnick. 2009. "National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality" Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4):641-78.
8. - 2010. "Comparing Oral Interviews with Self-Administered Computerized Questionnaires: An Experiment" Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1):154-67.
9. Conrad, Frederick G., and Michael F. Schober. 2000. "Clarifying Question Meaning in a Household Telephone Survey" Public Opinion Quarterly 64(1):1-28.
10. Couper, Mick P. 2000. "Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches" Public Opinion Quarterly 64(4):464-94.
11. - 2005. "Technology Trends in Survey Data Collection" Social Science Computer Review 23(4):486-501.
12. - 2008. "Technology and the Survey Interview/Questionnaire" In Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future, edited by Michael F. Schober and Frederick G. Conrad. New York: Wiley, 58-76.
13. Couper, Mick P., and William L. Nicholls II. 1998. "The History and Development of Computer- Assisted Survey Information Collection" In Computer-Assisted Survey Information Collection, edited by Mick P. Couper, et al. New York: Wiley, 1-21.
14. Couper, Mick P., and Linda Stinson. 1999. "Completion of Self-Administered Questionnaires in a Sex Survey" Journal of Sex Research 36(4):321-30. (Pubitemid 30026967)
15. Couper, Mick P., Roger Tourangeau, and Theresa Marvin. 2009. "Taking the Audio out of Audio- CASI" Public Opinion Quarterly 73(2):281-303.
16. De Leeuw, Edith D. 1992. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
17. - 2005. "To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys" Journal of Official Statistics 21(2):233-55.
18. - 2008. "Choosing the Method of Data Collection" In Social Research and the Internet, edited by Marcel Das, Peter Ester, and Lars Kaczmirek. New York: Taylor and Francis, 113-35.
19. De Leeuw, Edith D., and Johannes van der Zouwen. 1988. "Data Quality in Telephone and Faceto- Face Surveys: A Comparative Meta-Analysis" In Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by Robert M. Groves, Paul P. Biemer, Lars E. Lyberg, James T. Massey, William L. Nicholls II, and Joseph Waksberg. New York: Wiley, 283-99.
20. Deming, W. Edwards. 1944. "On Errors in Surveys" American Sociological Review 9(4):359-69.
21. Dillman, Don A. 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys; The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
22. Dillman, Don A., Jolene D. Smyth, and Leah Melani Christian. 2009. Internet, Mail, and Mixed- Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: Wiley.
23. Dockray, Samantha, Nina Grant, Arthur A. Stone, Daniel Kahneman, Jane Wardle, and Andrew Steptoe. 2010. "A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method" Social Indicators Research 99(2):269-83.
24. Fuchs, Marek. 2009. "Gender-of-Interviewer Effects in a Video-Enhanced Web Survey: Results from a Randomized Field Experiment" Social Psychology 40(1):37-42.
25. Fuchs, Marek, Mick P. Couper, and Sue Ellen Hansen. 2000. "Technology Effects: Do CAPI Interviews Take Longer?" Journal of Official Statistics 16(3):273-86.
26. Gentry, Robin, and Cindy Good. 2008. "Offering Respondents a Choice of Survey Mode: Use Patterns of an Internet Response Option in a Mail Survey" Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, New Orleans, LA.
27. Griffin, Deborah H., Donald P. Fischer, and Michael T. Morgan. 2001. "Testing an Internet Response Option for the American Community Survey" Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Quebec: Canada.
28. Groves, Robert M. 1979. "Actors and Questions in Telephone and Personal Interview Surveys" Public Opinion Quarterly 43(2):190-205.
29. -1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.
30. Groves, Robert M., Floyd J. Fowler Jr., Mick P. Couper, James M. Lepkowski, Eleanor Singer, and Roger Tourangeau. 2009. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
31. Groves, Robert M., and Robert L. Kahn. 1979. Surveys by Telephone: A National Comparison with Personal Interviews. New York: Academic Press.
32. Groves, Robert M., and James M. Lepkowski. 1985. "Dual Frame, Mixed Mode Survey Designs" Journal of Official Statistics 1(3):263-86.
33. Hochstim, Joseph R. 1967. "A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from Households" Journal of the American Statistical Association 62:976-89.
34. Holbrook, Allyson L., Melanie C. Green, and Jon A. Krosnick. 2003. "Telephone versus Face-to- Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias" Public Opinion Quarterly 67(1):79-125.
35. Holmberg, Anders, Boris Lorenc, and Peter Werner. 2010. "Contact Strategies to Improve Participation via the Web in a Mixed-Mode Mail and Web Survey" Journal of Official Statistics 26(3):465-80.
36. Jäckle, Annette, Caroline Roberts, and Peter Lynn. 2010. "Assessing the Effect of Data Collection Mode on Measurement" International Statistical Review 78(1):3-20.
37. Kreuter, Frauke, Stanley Presser, and Roger Tourangeau. 2008. "Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity" Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5):847-65.
38. Krysan, Maria, and Mick P. Couper. 2005. "Race-of-Interviewer Effects: What Happens on the Web?" International Journal of Internet Science 1(1):5-16.
39. Link, Michael W., and Ali H. Mokdad. 2006. "Can Web and Mail Survey Modes Improve Participation in an RDD-Based National Health Surveillance?" Journal of Official Statistics 22(2):293-312.
40. Lozar, Manfreda, Katja, Michael Bosnjak, Jemej Berzelak, Iris Haas, and Vasja Vehovar. 2008. "Web Surveys versus Other Survey Modes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates" International Journal of Market Research 50(1):79-104.
41. Lyberg, Lars E., and Daniel Kasprzyk. 1991. "Data Collection Methods and Measurement Error: An Overview" In Measurement Errors in Surveys, edited by Paul P. Biemer, Robert M. Groves, Lars E. Lyberg, Nancy A. Mathiowetz, and Seymour Sudman New York: Wiley, 237-57.
42. Martin, Elizabeth A., Jennifer H. Childs, Theresa DeMaio, Joan Hill, Courtney Reiser, Eleanor Gerber, Kathleen Styles, and Don A. Dillman. 2007. Guidelines for Designing Questionnaires for Administration in Different Modes. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
43. Martin, Peter. 2011. "What Makes a Good Mix? Chances and Challenges of Mixed Mode Data Collection in the ESS". Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Working Paper No. 02, February.
44. Nicolaas, Gerry. 2010. "What Is Meant by Mode Effect on Measurement? A Research Study to Identify Causes of Mode Effects" Paper presented at the NCRM Research Methods Festival, Oxford, UK.
45. O'Neil, Michael J. 1979. "Estimating the Nonresponse Bias Due to Refusals in Telephone Surveys" Public Opinion Quarterly 43(2):218-32.
46. Payne, Stanley L. 1964. "Combination of SurveyMethods" Journal of Marketing Research 1(2):61-62.
47. Poynter, Ray. 2010. The Handbook of Online and Social Media Research. Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
48. Schober, Michael F., and Frederick G. Conrad. 1997. "Does Conversational Interviewing Reduce Survey Measurement Error?" Public Opinion Quarterly 61(4):576-602.
49. - 2008. "Survey Interviews and New Communication Technologies" In Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future, edited by Frederick G. Conrad and Michael F. Schober. New York: Wiley, 1-30.
50. Shiffman, Saul, Arthur A. Stone, and Michael R. Hufford. 2008. "Ecological Momentary Assessment" Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4:1-32. (Pubitemid 351688514)
51. Shih, Tse-Hua, and Xitao Fan. 2007. "Response Rates and Mode Preferences in Web-Mail Mixed- Mode Surveys: A Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Internet Science 2(1):59-82.
52. Smyth, Jolene D., Don A. Dillman, Leah Melani Christian, and Allison C. O'Neill. 2010. "Using the Internet to Survey Small Towns and Communities: Limitations and Possibilities in the Early 21st Century" American Behavioral Scientist 53(9):1423-48.
53. Tourangeau, Roger. 2007. "Incentives, Falling Response Rates, and the Respondent-Researcher Relationship" In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Health Survey Research Methods. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS, 244-53.
54. Tourangeau, Roger, Lance Rips, and Kenneth Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. Tourangeau, Roger, Darby M. Steiger, and David Wilson. 2002. "Self-Administered Questions by Telephone: Evaluating Interactive Voice Response" Public Opinion Quarterly 66(2):265-78. (Pubitemid 37239591)
56. Tourkin, Steven, Randall Parmer, Shawna Cox, and Andrew Zukerberg. 2005. "(Inter) Net Gain? Experiments to Increase Response" Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, FL.
57. Van Lohuizen, Jan, and Robert Wayne Samohyl. 2011. "Method Effects and Robo-Polls" Survey Practice (February). www.surveypractice.org.
58. Vannieuwenhuyze, Jorre, Geert Loosveldt, and Geert Molenberghs. 2011. "A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys" Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5):1027-45.
59. Ye, Cong, Jenna Fulton, and Roger Tourangeau. 2011. "More Positive or More Extreme? A Meta- Analysis of Mode Differences in Response Choice" Public Opinion Quarterly 75(2):349-65.