Quality-adjusted life years lost to road crash injury: Updating the injury impairment index

Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine

Volumn 55, Issue , 2011, Pages 365-377

  Spicer, Rebecca S ^a   Miller, Ted R ^a   Hendrie, Delia ^b   Blincoe, Lawrence J ^c  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; MEDICINE; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS;

HEALTH STATUS; INTER QUARTILE RANGES; LITERATURE SEARCH; LOSS ESTIMATES; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING ALGORITHMS; WORK-RELATED;

SCALES (WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS);

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 84055190601     PISSN: 19432461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Aiken DV, Zamula WW. Valuation of quality of life losses associated with nonfatal injury: Insights from jury verdict data. Rev Law Econ 5(5): 293-310; 2009.
2. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, et al. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80: 877-884; 1999.
3. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Cost-Effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 466-471; 1993.
4. Blincoe LJ, Seay A, Zaloshnja E, et al. The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2000 (DOT HS 809 446). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; May, 2002.
5. Brazier J, Roberts J, Devierill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 21(2): 271-292; 2002.
6. Carsten O. Relationship of Accident Type to Occupant Injuries (UMTR-86-15). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute; 1986.
7. Cohen M, Miller TR. Willingness to award non-monetary damages and the implied value of life from jury awards. Int Rev Law Econ 23: 165-181; 2003.
8. Devlin NJ, Hansen P, Kind P, et al. Logical inconsistencies in survey respondents' health state valuations - a methodological challenge for estimating social tariffs. Health Econ 12: 529-544; 2003.
9. Dillingham A, Miller TR, Levy DT. A more general and unified measure for valuing labor market risk. Appl Econ 28: 537-542; 1996.
10. Doctor JN, Bleichrodt H, Lin HJ. Health utility bias: A systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation. Med Decis Making 30(1): 58-67; 2010.
11. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11): 1095-1108; 1997.
12. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199-208; 1990.
13. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D Value Sets: Inventory, Comparative Review and User Guide. The Netherlands: Springer; 2007.
14. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 40(2): 113-128; 2002.
15. Fryback DG, Dashbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam health outcomes study: Initial catalog of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making 13: 89-102; 1993.
16. Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, Martin PA, et al. Predicting quality of well-being scores from the SF-36: Results from the Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study. Med Decis Making 17: 1-9; 1997.
17. Gold MR, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation: The predictive validity of a preference-based instrument and self-rated health. Med Care 34(2): 163-177; 1996.
18. Gold MR, Franks P, McCoy KI, et al. Toward consistency in cost-utility analyses: Using national measures to create condition-specific values. Med Care 36: 778-792; 1998.
19. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al., editors. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine:Report of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
20. Green CH, Brown R. Life Safety: What Is It and How Much Is It Worth? Garston, Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment, Department of the Environment; 1978.
21. Hakim Z, Pathak DS. Modelling the EuroQol data: A comparison of discrete choice conjoint and conditional preference modeling. Health Econ 8: 103-116; 1999.
22. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N. Construction and Utility Scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life Instrument. Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Working Paper 101; 2000.
23. Hirsch A, Eppinger R, Shame T, et al. Impairment Scaling from the Abbreviated Injury Scale. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1983.
24. Isacson D, Bingefors K, Lindberg M. Self-reported dermatological problems and preferences for health: An epidemiological survey. Acta Dermato-Venereologica 84: 27-31; 2004.
25. Javitt JC, Aiello LP. Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Annals Intern Med 124(1 pt 2): 164-169; 1996.
26. Johns Hopkins University, Tri-Analytics Inc. ICDMAP-90 Software User's Guide; 1997.
27. Kaplan RM. Human preference measurement for health decisions and the evaluation of long-term care. In: Kane RL, Kane RM, editors. Values and Long-Term Care. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1982. p. 157-188.
28. Kind P, Rosser R, Williams A. Valuation of quality of life: Some psychometric evidence. In: Jones-Lee MW, editor. The Value of Life and Safety. New York, NY: North-Holland Publishing; 1982. p. 159-170.
29. Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Isacson DGI, et al. The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Med Decis Making 19: 128-140; 1999.
30. MacKenzie EJ, Damiano A, Miller TR, et al. The development of the functional capacity index. J Trauma 41(5): 799-807; 1996.
31. Miller TR. Costs and functional consequences of United States roadway crashes. Accid Anal Prev 25(5): 593-607; 1993.
32. Miller TR. Valuing non-fatal quality of life losses with quality-adjusted life years: The health economist's meow. J Forensic Econ 13(2): 145-168; 2000.
33. Miller TR, Pindus NM, Douglass JB, et al. Databook onNnonfatal Injury: Incidence, Costs, and Consequences. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press; 1995.
34. Miller TR, Zaloshjna E, Hendrie D. Cost-outcome analyses of booster seats for auto occupants age 4-7. Pediatrics 118(5): 1994-1998; 2006.
35. Murray C, Lopez A. The Global Burden of Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.
36. Nichol MB, Sengupta N, Globe D. Evaluating Quality-Adjusted Life years. Estimation of the Health Utility Index (HU12) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making 21: 105-112; 2001.
37. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993.
38. Pindus NM, Miller TR, Douglass JB. Disability follow-up study, Final Report to the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 1991.
39. Salomon JA, Murray CJL. A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations. Health Econ 13: 281-290; 2004.
40. Sengupta N, Nichol MB, Wu J, et al. Mapping the SF-12 to the HU13 and VAS in a managed care population. Med Care 42(9): 927-937; 2004.
41. Shaw J, Johnson J, Coons SJ. U.S. valuation of the EQ-5D health states development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 43(3): 203-220; 2005.
42. Sintonen H. The 15D-Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life. I. Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of its Health State Descriptive System. Melbourne: National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Working Paper 41; 1994.
43. Smith SV, Zaloshnja E, Miller T, et al. Jury verdicts in drunken driving cases. Rev Law Econ 4(1): 1; 2008.
44. Tolley G, Kenkel D, Fabian R, editors. Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1994.
45. Torrance GW. Multiattribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long term care. In: Kane RL, Kane RM, editors. Values and Long-Term Care. Lexington: DC Heath; 1982. p. 127-156.
46. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 34(7): 702-722; 1996.
47. Tosteson ANA, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, et al. Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporosis Int 21: 1042-1049; 2001.
48. U.S. Department of Transportation. Treatment of Value of Life and Injuries in Preparing Economic Evaluations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary; 1993.
49. Vachal K, Tumuhairwe EK, Berwick M. Underride safety protection: benefit-cost assessment of rear-impact guards for the North Dakota farm truck fleet. Traffic Inj Prev 10(2): 178-183; 2009.
50. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473-483; 1992.
51. Wyatt JR, Niparko JK, Rothman M, et al. Cost utility of the multichannel cochlear implant in 258 profoundly deaf individuals. Laryngoscope 106(7): 816-821; 1996.
52. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR. Costs of crashes related to road conditions, United States, 2006. Ann Adv Automot Med 53: 141-153, 2009.
53. Zaloshnja E, Miller TR, Romano EO, et al. Crash costs by body part injured, fracture involvement, and threat to life severity, United States, 2000. Accid Anal Prev 36(3): 415-427; 2004.