Do hemodynamic measures accurately predict volume responsiveness when lung compliance is severely reduced by acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome?

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 327-328

  Hatton, Kevin W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EDITORIAL; FLUID THERAPY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FILLING; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INJURY SEVERITY; LEG MOVEMENT; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG EDEMA; LUNG VOLUME; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOCK;

BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT;

EID: 84055189970     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236e31a     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Silva PL, Cruz FF, Fujisaki LC, et al: Hypervolemia induces and potentiates lung damage after recruitment maneuver in a model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care 2010; 14:R114
2. Durairaj L, Schmidt GA: Fluid therapy in resuscitated sepsis: Less is more. Chest 2008; 133:252-263
3. Joshi GP: Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:601-605
4. Pinsky MR, Teboul JL: Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11:235-239
5. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178
6. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699
7. Asopa A, Karthik S, Subramaniam B: Current status of dynamic parameters of fluid loading. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 48:23-36
8. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefèvre D, et al: Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15:R85
9. Lefrant JY, De Backer D: Can we use pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with ARDS? Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:966-968
10. Teboul JL, Vieillard-Baron A: Clinical value of pulse pressure variations in ARDS. Still an unresolved issue? Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:499-500
11. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2810-2816
12. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferre A, et al: Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:152-161
13. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, et al: Comparison of two fluidmanagement strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2564-2575