A matlab toolbox for music information retrieval

Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 261-268

  Lartillot, Olivier ^a   Toiviainen, Petri ^a   Eerola, Tuomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MACHINE LEARNING;

ACOUSTIC FEATURES; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; MATLAB TOOLBOXES; MODULAR FRAMEWORK; MUSIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MUSICAL FEATURES; SEGMENTATION AND CLUSTERING; STATE OF THE ART;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

EID: 84055186329     PISSN: 14318814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_31     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. EEROLA, T. and TOIVIAINEN, P. (2004): MIR in Matlab: The MIDI Toolbox. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 22-27, Barcelona.
2. FOOTE, J. and COOPER, M. (2003): Media segmentation using self-similarity decomposition. In Proceedings of SPIE Storage and Retrieval for Multimedia Databases, 5021, 167-75.
3. GOMEZ, E. (2006): Tonal description of polyphonic audio for music content processing. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18-3, 294-304.
4. JUSLIN, P. N. (1997): Emotional communication in music performance: A functionalist perspective and some data. Music Perception, 14, 383-418.
5. JUSLIN, P. N. and LAUKKA, P. (2003): Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin (129), 770-814.
6. KRUMHANSL, C. (1990): Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch. Oxford University Press, New York.
7. KRUMHANSL, C. and KESSLER, E. J. (1982): Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
8. NABNEY, I. (2002): NETLAB: Algorithms for Pattern Recognition. Springer Advances In Pattern Recognition Series, Springer-Verlag, New-York.
9. RABINER, L. and JUANG, B. H. (1993): Fundamentals of Speech Recognition. Prentice-Hall.
10. SCHERER, K. R. and OSHINSKY J. S. (1977): Cue utilization in emotion attribution from auditory stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 1-4, 331-346.
11. SLANEY, M. (1998): Auditory Toolbox Version 2. Technical Report 1998-010, Interval Research Corporation.
12. TOIVIAINEN, P. and KRUMHANSL, C. (2003): Measuring and modeling real-time responses to music: The dynamics of tonality induction, Perception, 32-6, 741-766.
13. TOIVIAINEN, P. and SNYDER J. S. (2003): Tapping to Bach: Resonance-based modeling of pulse. Music Perception, 21(1), 43-80.
14. TZANETAKIS, G and COOK, P. (1999): Multifeature audio segmentation for browsing and annotation. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. New-York.
15. TZANETAKIS, G. and COOK, P. (2002): Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5), 293-302.
16. VESANTO, J. (1999): Self-organizing map in Matlab: the SOM Toolbox. Proceedings of the Matlab DSP Conference 1999. Espoo, Finland,35-40.
17. WITTEN, I. H. and FRANK, E. (2005): Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2005.