Real-time measurement of face recognition in rapid serial visual presentation

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue MAR, 2011, Pages

  Touryan, Jon ^a   Gibson, Laurie ^a   Horne, James H ^a   Weber, Paul ^a  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Classifier; Event related potential; Object categorization; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84055181651     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00042     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chun, M. M., and Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 109-127.
2. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Mem. Cogn. 28, 923-938.
3. Curran, T., Gibson, L., Horne, J. H., Young, B., and Bozell, A. P. (2009). Expert image analysts show enhanced visual processing in change detection. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 390-397.
4. Curran, T., and Hancock, J. (2007). The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces. Neuroimage 36, 464-471.
5. Gabrieli, J. D. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49, 87-115.
6. Green, D. B., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
7. Guo, C., Voss, J. L., and Paller, K. A. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of forming memories for faces, names, and face-name associations. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 22, 153-164.
8. Klobassa, D. S., Vaughan, T. M., Brunner, P., Schwartz, N. E., Wolpaw, J. R., Neuper, C., and Sellers, E. W. (2009). Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain-computer interface. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1252-1261.
9. Krusienski, D. J., Sellers, E. W., Cabestaing, F., Bayoudh, S., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., and Wolpaw, J. R. (2006). A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller. J. Neural Eng. 3, 299-305.
10. Luo, A., and Sajda, P. (2009). Comparing neural correlates of visual target detection in serial visual presentations having different temporal correlations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:5. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.005.2009
11. MacKenzie, G., and Donaldson, D. I. (2007). Dissociating recollection from familiarity: electrophysiological evidence that familiarity for faces is associated with a posterior old/new effect. Neuroimage 36, 454-463.
12. McCarthy, G., and Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62, 203-208.
13. Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., and Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 243-250.
14. Paller, K. A., and Wagner, A. D. (2002). Observing the transformation of experience into memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 93-102.
15. Parra, L., Alvino, C., Tang, A., Pearlmutter, B., Yeung, N., Osman, A., and Sajda, P. (2002). Linear spatial integration for single-trial detection in encephalography. Neuroimage 17, 223-230.
16. Perkins, S., Lacker, K., and Theiler, J. (2003). Grafting: fast, incremental feature selection by gradient descent in function space. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1333-1356.
17. Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, C. S., and Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 392, 595-598.
18. Sellers, E. W., Krusienski, D. J., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., and Wolpaw, J. R. (2006). A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol. Psychol. 73, 242-252.
19. Smith, M. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 1-13.
20. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., and Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520-522.
21. Touryan, J., Gibson, L., Horne, J. H., and Weber, P. (2010). " Real-time classification of neural signals corresponding to the detection of targets in video imagery," in International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Miami, FL, 60.
22. Voss, J. L., Lucas, H. D., and Paller, K. A. (2010). Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2638-2651.
23. Voss, J. L., and Paller, K. A. (2006). Fluent conceptual processing and explicit memory for faces are electrophysiologically distinct. J. Neurosci. 26, 926-933.
24. Voss, J. L., Reber, P. J., Mesulam, M. M., Parrish, T. B., and Paller, K. A. (2008). Familiarity and conceptual priming engage distinct cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1712-1719.
25. Wixted, J. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 114, 152-176.
26. Yonelinas, A. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. J. Mem. Lang. 46, 441-517.
27. Yovel, G., and Paller, K. A. (2004). The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered. Neuroimage 21, 789-800.