Development of environmental thresholds for nitrogen and phosphorus in streams

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-20

  Chambers, Patricia A ^a   McGoldrick, Daryl J ^a   Brua, Robert B ^a   Vis, Chantal ^a,b   Culp, Joseph M ^c   Benoy, Glenn A ^d  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b PARKS CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^d AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL STREAMS; ANALYSIS OF DATA; AQUATIC FAUNA; AQUATIC PLANTS; BENTHIC DIATOMS; BIOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS; CHEMICAL THRESHOLDS; DATA SETS; ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; ECOLOGICAL STUDIES; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD; FRESH WATER; LAND COVER; LONG TERM MONITORING; MACROINVERTEBRATES; MIXEDWOOD; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS; NUTRIENT CRITERIA; WATER CHEMISTRY;

EUTROPHICATION; HYDROCHEMISTRY; PHOSPHORUS;

NUTRIENTS;

FRESH WATER; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS;

ALGA; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIATOM; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EUTROPHICATION; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; MICROINVERTEBRATE; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; AGRICULTURE; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; RIVER; STANDARD; WATER POLLUTANT;

ALGAE; BACILLARIOPHYTA;

AGRICULTURE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUTROPHICATION; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; RIVERS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84055173489     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: 15372537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0273     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alberta Environment. 1999. Surface water quality guidelines for use in Alberta. Alberta Environment, Edmonton, Canada.
2. APHA. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Am. Public Health Assoc., Am. Water Works Assoc., and Water Pollution and Control Federation, Washington, DC.
3. ANZECC and ARMCANZ. 2000. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Volume 1: The guidelines (Chapters 1-7). Aust. N.Z. Environ. Conserv. Counc., Agric. Resour. Manage. Counc. Austr., N.Z, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
4. Arbuckle, K.E., and J.A. Downing. 2001. The influence of watershed land use on lake N:P in a predominantly agricultural landscape. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46:970-975.
5. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. 2nd ed. EPA 841-B-99-002. USEPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
6. Basu, B.K., and F.R. Pick. 1996. Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41:1572- 1577. doi:10.4319/lo.1996.41.7.1572
7. Bechmann, M., J. Deelstra, P. Stålnacke, H.O. Eggestad, L. Øygarden, and A. Pengerud. 2008. Monitoring catchment scale agricultural pollution in Norway: Policy instruments, implementation of mitigation methods and trends in nutrient and sediment losses. Environ. Sci. Policy 11:102-114. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.10.005
8. Benoy, G.A., A.B. Sutherland, J.M. Culp, and R.B. Brua. 2011. Physical and ecological thresholds for deposited sediments in streams in agricultural landscapes. J. Environ. Qual. 41:31-40 (this issue). doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0251
9. Biggs, B.J.F. 2000. New Zealand periphyton guideline: Detecting, monitoring and managing enrichment of streams. New Zealand Ministry for the Environ., Wellington, New Zealand.
10. Boesch, D.F. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems. Estuaries 25:886-900. doi:10.1007/BF02804914
11. Bothwell, M.L. 1989. Phosphorus-limited growth dynamics of lotic periphytic diatom communities: Areal biomass and cellular growth rate responses. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:1293-1301. doi:10.1139/f89-166
12. Bourassa, N., and A. Cattaneo. 1998. Control of periphyton biomass in Laurentian streams (Québec). J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 17:420-429. doi:10.2307/1468363
13. Bowes, M.J., J.T. Smith, J. Hilton, M.M. Sturt, and P.D. Armitage. 2007. Periphyton biomass response to changing phosphorus concentrations in a nutrient impacted river: A new methodology for phosphorus target setting. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64:227-238. doi:10.1139/F06-180
14. Breiman, L., J.H. Freidman, R.A. Olshen, and C.J. Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
15. Broussard, W., and R.E. Turner. 2009. A century of changing land-use and water-quality relationships in the continental US. Front. Ecol. Environ 7:302-307. doi:10.1890/080085
16. Camargo, J.A., and A. Alonso. 2006. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment. Environ. Int. 32:831-849. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002
17. Carleton, J.N., R.A. Park, and J.S. Clough. 2009. Ecosystem modeling applied to nutrient criteria development in rivers. Environ. Manage. 44:485- 492. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9344-2
18. Carpenter, S.R., N.F. Caraco, D.L. Correll, R.W. Howarth, A.N. Sharpley, and V.H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 8:559-568. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2
19. CCME. 2004. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Phosphorus, Canadian guidance framework for the management of freshwater systems. In Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (ed.) Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 2004. Can. Counc. of Ministers of the Environ., Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
20. Chambers, P.A., C. Vis, R.B. Brua, M. Guy, J.M. Culp, and G.A. Benoy. 2008. Eutrophication of agricultural streams: Defining nutrient concentrations to protect ecological condition. Water Sci. Technol. 58:2203-2210. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.815
21. Chételat, J., F.R. Pick, A. Morin, and P.B. Hamilton. 1999. Periphyton biomass and community composition in rivers of different nutrient status. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:560-569. doi:10.1139/cjfas-56-4-560
22. Cormier, S.M., J.F. Paul, R.L. Spehar, P. Shaw-Allen, W.J. Berry, and G.W. Suterx II. 2008. Using field data and weight of evidence to develop water quality criteria. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 4:490-504. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2008-018.1
23. D'Elia, D.F., W.R. Boynton, and J.G. Sanders. 2003. A watershed perspective on nutrient enrichment, science, and policy in the Patuxent River, Maryland: 1960-2000. Estuaries 26:171-185. doi:10.1007/BF02695960
24. Dodds, W.K., W.W. Bouska, J.L. Eitzmann, T.J. Pilger, K.L. Pitts, A.J. Riley, J.T. Schloesser, and D.J. Thornbrugh. 2009. Eutrophication of U.S. freshwaters: Analysis of potential economic damages. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:12-19. doi:10.1021/es801217q
25. Dodds, W.K., K. Gido, M.R. Whiles, K.M. Fritz, and W.J. Matthews. 2004. Life on the edge: The ecology of Great Plains prairie streams. BioScience 54:205- 281. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0205:LOTETE]2.0.CO;2
26. Dodds, W.K., J.R. Jones, and E.B. Welch. 1998. Suggested classification of stream trophic state: Distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorus. Water Res. 32:1455-1462. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9
27. Dodds, W.K., and R.M. Oakes. 2004. A technique for establishing reference nutrient concentrations across watersheds affected by humans. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 2:333-341.
28. Dodds, W.K., V.H. Smith, and K. Lohman. 2002. Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59:865-874. doi:10.1139/f02-063
29. Dodds, W.K., V.H. Smith, and K. Lohman. 2006. Erratum: Nitrogen and phosphorus relationships to benthic algal biomass in temperate streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63:1190-1191. doi:10.1139/F06-040
30. Dodds, W.K., V.H. Smith, and B. Zander. 1997. Developing nutrient targets to control benthic chlorophyll levels in streams: A case study of the Clark Fork River. Water Res. 31:1738-1750. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00389-2
31. Dodds, W.K., and E.B. Welch. 2000. Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 19:186-196. doi:10.2307/1468291
32. El-Shaarawi, A.H., and J. Lin. 2007. Interval estimation for log-normal mean with applications to water quality. Environmetrics 18:1-10. doi:10.1002/env.798
33. Fitzpatrick, F.A., B.C. Scudder, B.N. Lenz, and D.J. Sullivan. 2001. Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37:1489-1507. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03655.x
34. Forsberg, C., and S.-O. Ryding. 1980. Eutrophication parameters and trophic state indices in 30 Swedish waste-receiving lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 89:189-207.
35. Green, M.B., and J.C. Finlay. 2010. Patterns of hydrologic control over stream water total nitrogen to total phosphorus ratios. Biogeochemistry 99:15- 30. doi:10.1007/s10533-009-9394-9
36. Grimvall, A., P. Stålnacke, and A. Tonderski. 2000. Time scales of nutrient losses from land to sea: A European perspective. Ecol. Eng. 14:363-371. doi:10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00061-0
37. Hart, B.T., B. Maher, and I. Lawrence. 1999. New generation water quality guidelines for ecosystem protection. Freshw. Biol. 41:347-359. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00435.x
38. Heiskary, S., and H. Markus. 2001. Establishing relationships among nutrient concentrations, phytoplankton abundance, and biochemical oxygen demand in Minnesota, USA, rivers. J. Lake Reserv. Manage. 17:251-262. doi:10.1080/07438140109354134
39. Hill, W.R., S.E. Fanta, and B.J. Roberts. 2009. Quantifying phosphorus and light effects in stream algae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54:368-380. doi:10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0368
40. Holling, C.S. (ed.) 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
41. Jones, J.R., and M.F. Knowlton. 1993. Limnology of Missouri reservoirs: An analysis of regional patterns. Lake Reservoir Manage. 8:17-30. doi:10.1080/07438149309354455
42. Jones, J.R., M.M. Smart, and J.N. Burroughs. 1984. Factors related to algal biomass in Missouri Ozark streams. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 22:1867-1875.
43. Joye, S.B., V.H. Smith, and R.W. Howarth (ed.) 2006. Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51:351-355. doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0351
44. Kelly, M.G. 1998. Use of the Trophic Diatom Index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Res. 32:236-242. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00157-7
45. Kelly, M.G., and B.A. Whitton. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: A new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 7:433-444. doi:10.1007/BF00003802
46. Lavoie, I., S. Campeau, M. Grenier, and P.J. Dillon. 2006. A diatom-based index for the biological assessment of eastern Canadian rivers: An application of correspondence analysis (CA). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63:1793-1811. doi:10.1139/F06-084
47. Lewis, W.M., Jr., J.M. Melack, W.H. McDowell, M. McClain, and J.E. Richey. 1999. Nitrogen yields from undisturbed watersheds in the Americas. Biogeochemistry 46:149-162. doi:10.1007/BF01007577
48. Lohman, K., and J.R. Jones. 1999. Nutrient-sestonic chlorophyll relationships in northern Ozark streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56:124-130. doi:10.1139/cjfas-56-1-124
49. Lohman, K., J.R. Jones, and B.D. Perkins. 1992. Effects of nutrient enrichment and flood frequency on periphyton biomass in northern Ozark streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:1198-1205. doi:10.1139/f92-135
50. Marchant, R. 1989. A subsampler for samples of benthic invertebrates. Bull. Aust. Soc. Limnol. 12:49-52.
51. Miltner, R.J. 2010. A method and rationale for deriving nutrient criteria for small rivers and streams in Ohio. Environ. Manage. 45:842-855. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9439-9
52. Natural Resources Canada. 2006. National Topographic Data Base [machine readable data files]. Nat. Resour. Can., Cent. for Topogr. Inf., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
53. Nordin, R.N. 1985. Water quality criteria for nutrients and algae, technical appendix. British Columbia Ministry of Environ., Victoria, Canada.
54. Nürnberg, G. 1996. Trophic state of clear and colored, soft- and hardwater lakes with special consideration of nutrients, anoxia, phytoplankton and fish. Lake Reservoir Manage. 12:432-447. doi:10.1080/07438149609354283
55. Nusch, E.A. 1980. Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 14:14-36.
56. OMEE. 1994. Water management policies, guidelines, and provincial water quality objectives. Ontario Ministry of Environ. and Energy, Toronto, Canada.
57. Passy, S.I. 2008. Continental diatom biodiversity in stream benthos declines as more nutrients become limiting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:9663- 9667. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802542105
58. Potapova, M., and D.F. Charles. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecol. Indic. 7:48-70. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.10.001
59. Pretty, J.N., C.F. Mason, D.B. Nedwell, R.E. Hine, S. Leaf, and R. Dils. 2003. Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:201-208. doi:10.1021/es020793k
60. Reynoldson, T.B., C. Logan, T. Pascoe, and S.P. Thompson. 2006. CABIN (Canadian Aquatic Biomonitoring Network) invertebrate biomonitoring field and laboratory manual for running water habitats. Natl. Water Res. Inst., Environ. Can., Burlington, ON, Canada.
61. Reynoldson, T.B., R.H. Norris, V.H. Resh, and D.M. Rosenberg. 1997. The reference condition: A comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 16:833-852. doi:10.2307/1468175
62. Richardson, C.J., R.S. King, S.S. Qian, P. Vaithiyanathan, R.G. Qualls, and C.A Stow. 2008. Estimating ecological thresholds for phosphorus in the Everglades. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:8084-8091. doi:10.1021/es062624w
63. Rier, S.T., and R.J. Stevenson. 2006. Response of periphytic algae to gradients in nitrogen and phosphorus in streamside mesocosms. Hydrobiologia 561:131-147. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1610-6
64. Rohm, C.M., J.M Omernik, A.J. Woods, and J.L Stoddard. 2002. Regional characteristics of nutrient concentrations in streams and their application to nutrient criteria development. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38:213-239.
65. Royer, T.V., M.B. David, L.E. Gentry, C.A. Mitchell, K.M. Starks, T. Heatherly II, and M.R. Whiles. 2008. Assessment of chlorophyll-a as a criterion for establishing nutrient standards in the streams and rivers of Illinois. J. Environ. Qual. 37:437-447. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0344
66. Smith, R.A., R.B. Alexander, and G. Schwarz. 2003. Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:3039-3047. doi:10.1021/es020663b
67. Smith, V.H. 2003. Eutrophication of freshwater and marine ecosystems: A global problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 10:126-139. doi:10.1065/espr2002.12.142
68. Soranno, P.A., K.S. Cheruvelil, R.J. Stevenson, S.L. Rollins, S.W. Holden, S. Heaton, and E.K. Torng. 2008. A framework for developing ecosystem-specific nutrient criteria: Integrating biological thresholds with predictive modeling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53:773-787. doi:10.4319/lo.2008.53.2.0773
69. Stevenson, R.J. 1984. Epilithic and epipelic diatoms in the Sandusky River, with emphasis on species diversity and water quality. Hydrobiologia 114:161-175. doi:10.1007/BF00031868
70. Stevenson, R.J., B.H. Hill, A.T. Herlihy, L.L. Yuan, and S.B. Norton. 2008. Algae-P relationships, thresholds, and frequency distributions guide nutrient criterion development. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 27:783-799. doi:10.1899/07-077.1
71. Stoddard, J.L., D.P. Larsen, C.P. Hawkins, R.K. Johnson, and R.H. Norris. 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: The concept of reference condition. Ecol. Appl. 16:1267-1276. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:SEFTEC]2.0.CO;2
72. Suplee, M.W., V. Watson, M. Teply, and H. McKee. 2009. How green is too green? Public opinion of what constitutes undesirable algae levels in streams. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 45:123-140. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00265.x
73. Taranu, Z.E., and I. Gregory-Eaves. 2008. Quantifying relationships among phosphorus, agriculture, and lake depth at an inter-regional scale. Ecosystems 11:715-725. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9153-0
74. USEPA. 2000a. Ambient water quality criteria recommendations: Information supporting the development of state and tribal nutrient criteria for rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion I-XIV. USEPA, Office of Water, Office of Sci. and Technol., Health and Ecol. Criteria Div., Washington, DC.
75. USEPA. 2000b. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual: Rivers and streams. Rep. EPA-822-B-00-002. USEPA, Washington, DC.
76. Van Nieuwenhuyse, E.E., and J.R. Jones. 1996. Phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in temperate streams and its variation with stream catchment area. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53:99-105. doi:10.1139/cjfas-53-1-99
77. Wang, L., D.M. Robertson, and P.J. Garrison. 2007. Linkages between nutrients and assemblages of macroinvertebrates and fish in wadeable streams: Implication to nutrient criteria development. Environ. Manage. 39:194- 212. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0135-8
78. Weigel, B., and D. Robertson. 2007. Identifying biotic integrity and water chemistry relations in nonwadeable rivers of Wisconsin: Toward the development of nutrient criteria. Environ. Manage. 40:691-708. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0452-y
79. Weigel, B.M., L. Wang, P.W. Rasmussen, J.T. Butcher, P.M. Stewart, T.P. Simon, and M.J. Wiley. 2003. Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the northern lakes and forest ecoregion, USA. Freshw. Biol. 48:1440-1461. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01076.x
80. Welch, E.B., J.M. Jacoby, R.R. Horner, and M.R. Seeley. 1988. Nuisance biomass levels of periphytic algae in streams. Hydrobiologia 157:161-168. doi:10.1007/BF00006968