Probability assessment of burst limit state due to internal corrosion

International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

Volumn 89, Issue , 2012, Pages 48-58

  Hasan, Sikder ^a   Khan, Faisal ^a   Kenny, Shawn ^a  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

Author keywords

First order second moment; Internal corrosion; Limit state function etc; Monte Carlo; Probability of failure

Indexed keywords

FIRST ORDER SECOND MOMENT; INTERNAL CORROSION; LIMIT STATE FUNCTIONS; MONTE CARLO; PROBABILITY OF FAILURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORROSION RATE; DEFECTS; GAS INDUSTRY; GAS PIPELINES; PROBABILITY; RATING;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 83955164222     PISSN: 03080161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Law M., Bowie G. Prediction of failure strain and burst pressure in high yield-to-tensile strength ratio linepipe. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2007, 84:487-492.
2. Chiodo M., Ruggieri C. Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: numerical studies and verification analyses. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2009, 86:164-176.
3. Zhu X.-K., Leis B.N. Average shear stress yield criterion and its application to plastic collapse analysis of pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2006, 83:663-671.
4. Teixeria A.P., Soares C.G., Netto T.A., Estefen S.F. Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 2008, 85:228-237.
5. Lee Y.K., Kim Y.P., Moon M.W., Bang W.H., Oh K.H., Kim W.S. The prediction of failure pressure of gas pipeline with multi corroded region. Trans Tech Publication 2005, 475-479:3323-3326.
6. Lee O.S., Pyun J.S. Failure probability of corrosion pipeline with varying boundary condition. KSME International Journal 2002, 16(7):889-895.
7. CSA Z662-07 Limit state equation for burst of large leaks and rupture for corrosion defect 2007, Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Canadian Standards Association, pp. 554-555.
8. Recommended Practice DNV RP-F101 Corroded pipelines 2004.
9. ASME B31G Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines A supplement to ANSI/ASME B31 code for pressure piping 1995.
10. Netto T.A., Ferraz U.S., Estefan S.F. The effect of corrosion defect on the burst pressure of the pipeline. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2005, 61:1185-1204.
11. Bea R., Xu T. Corrosion effects on burst pressures RAM PIPE REQUAL 1999, University of California at Berkeley, Pipeline Requalification Guidelines Project Report 1. pp. 103-104.
12. Kiefner J.F., Maxey W.A., Eiber R.J., Duffy A.R. Failure stress levels of flaws in pressurized cylinders 1973, American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM STP 536, pp. 461-48 1.
13. Shannon R.W.E. The failure behaviour line pipe defects. International Journal of Pressure Vessel and Piping 1974, 2:243-255.
14. Kale A., Thacker B.H., Sridhar N., Waldhart J.C. A probabilistic model for internal corrosion of gas pipeline. International pipeline conference. Alberta, Canada 2004, IPC 04-0483.
15. Nesic S. Key issues related to modeling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipeline. Corrosion Science 2007, 49:4308-4338.
16. 2 corrosion rate calculation model, rev. 1 1998.
17. Gratland P.O., Johnsen R., Ovstetun I. Application of internal corrosion modeling in the risk assessment of pipelines. Corrosion 2003, Paper No 03179.
18. Waard C., de., Milliams D.E. Carbonic acid corrosion of steel. Corrosion 1975, 31(5):177-181.
19. 2 corrosion of carbon steel. Corrosion 1993, 93. Paper 69. Houston, TX: NACE International.
20. Amirat A., Benmoussat A., Chaoui A. Reliability assessment of underground pipelines under active corrosion defects. Damage and fracture mechanics: failure analysis of engineering materials and structures 2009, Springer Science, pp. 83-92.
21. Zimmerman T.J.E., Hopkins P., Sanderson N. Can limit states design be used to design a pipeline above 80% SMYS. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering (OMAE 1998) 1998, ASME.
22. Kiefner J.F., Vieth P.H. Evaluating pipe 1: new method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil & Gas Journal 1990, 88(32):56-59.
23. Kiefner J.F., Vieth P.H. Evaluating pipe conclusion: PC program speeds new criterion for evaluating corroded pipe. Oil & Gas Journal 1990, 88(34):91-93.
24. EN 1990 Basis of structural design 2001, Brussels.
25. Freire J.L.F., Vieira R.D., Castro J.T.P., Benjamin A.C. Part 3: burst tests of pipeline with extensive longitudinal metal loss. Experimental Techniques November 2006, 60-65.
26. Kiefner J.F., Maxey W.A., Eiber R.J., Duffy A.R. The failure stress levels of flaws in pressurised cylinders. ASTM STP 1973, vol. 536. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 461-481.
27. Cosham A., Hopkins P., Macdonal K.A. Best practice for the assessment of defect in pipelines-corrosion. Engineering Fatigue Analysis 2007, 14:1245-1265.
28. Gardner R.H., O'Neill R.V., Mankin J.B., Carney J.H. A comparison of sensitivity analysis and error analysis based on a stream ecosystem model. Ecol. Modelling. 1981, 12:173-190.