Biotreatment of Cr(VI) contaminated waters by sulphate reducing bacteria fed with ethanol

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 199-200, Issue , 2012, Pages 186-192

  Pagnanelli, F ^a   Cruz Viggi, C ^a   Cibati, A ^a   Uccelletti, D ^a   Toro, L ^a   Palleschi, C ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biomonitoring; Bioprecipitation; Caenorhabditis elegans; Hexavalent chromium; Sulphate reducing bacteria

Indexed keywords

BIO-PRECIPITATION; BIOMONITORING; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM; SULPHATE REDUCING BACTERIA;

BACTERIA; BIOSORPTION; CHEMICAL REACTORS; CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS; EFFLUENTS; ETHANOL; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

CHROMIUM;

ALCOHOL; CHROMIUM; LACTIC ACID;

BIOACTIVITY; BIOMONITORING; BIOREACTOR; CHROMIUM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EFFLUENT; ETHANOL; GROWTH RATE; INOCULATION; NEMATODE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SORPTION; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; SULFATE; SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIOSORPTION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EFFLUENT; FIXED BED REACTOR; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; INOCULATION; NONHUMAN; PRECIPITATION; STEADY STATE; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIUM; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CHROMIUM; SULFATES; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; NEMATODA;

EID: 83955161136     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.082     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Postgate J.R. The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria 1984, Cambridge University Press.
2. Neculita C.M., Zagury G.J., Bussière B. Passive treatment of AMD in bioreactors using SRB. J. Environ. Qual. 2007, 36:1-16.
3. Johnson D.B., Hallberg K.B. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 338:3-14.
4. Foucher S., Battaglia-Brunet F., Ignatiadis I., Morinet D. Treatment by sulfate-reducing bacteria of Chessy acid-mine drainage and metals recovery. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56:1639-1645.
5. Costa M.C., Santos E.S., Barros R.J., Piras C., Martins M. Wine wastes as carbon source for biological treatment of acid mine drainage. Chemosphere 2009, 75:831-836.
6. Liamleam W., Annachhatre A.P. Electron donors for biological sulphate reduction. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25:452-463.
7. Kaksonen A.H., Franzmann P.D., Puhakka J.A. Performance and ethanol oxidation kinetics of a sulfate-reducing fluidized-bed reactor treating acidic metal-containing wastewater. Biodegradation 2003, 14:207-217.
8. Nagpal S., Chuichulcherm S., Livingston A., Peeva L. Ethanol utilization by SRB: an experimental and modelling study. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 70:533-543.
9. Cruz Viggi C., Pagnanelli F., Cibati A., Uccelletti D., Palleschi C., Toro L. Biotreatment and bioassessment of heavy metal removal by sulphate reducing bacteria in fixed bed reactors. Water Res. 2010, 44:151-158.
10. Pagnanelli F., Cruz Viggi C., Mainelli S., Toro L. Assessment of solid reactive mixtures for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:998-1005.
11. Costa M.C., Martins M., Jesus C., Duarte J.C. Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using low cost matrices. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008, 189:149-162.
12. Gonçalves M.M.M., da Costa A.C.A., Leite S.G.F., Sant'Anna G.L. Heavy metal removal from synthetic wastewaters in an anaerobic bioreactor using stillage from ethanol distilleries as a carbon source. Chemosphere 2007, 69:1815-1820.
13. Zagury G.J., Kulnieks V., Neculita C.M. Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment. Chemosphere 2006, 64:944-954.
14. de Smul A., Dries J., Goethals L., Grootaerd H., Verstraete W. High rates of microbial sulphate reduction in a mesophilic ethanol-fed expanded-granular-sludge-blanket reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48:297-303.
15. Kalyuzhnyi S.V., de Leon Fragoso C., Rodriguez Martines J. Biological sulfate reduction in a UASB reactor fed with ethanol as the electron donor. Microbiology 1997, 66:562-567.
16. Martins M., Faleiro M.L., Barros R.J., Veríssimo A.R., Barreiros M.A., Costa M.C. Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166:706-713.
17. Chang I.S., Kim B.H. Effect of sulfate reduction activity on biological treatment of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] contaminated electroplating wastewater under sulfate-rich condition. Chemosphere 2007, 68:218-226.
18. Smith W.L., Gadd G.M. Reduction and precipitation of chromate by mixed culture sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88:983-991.
19. Pagnanelli F., De Michelis I., Di Muzio S., Ferella F., Vegliò F. Bioassessment of a combined chemical-biological treatment for synthetic acid mine drainage. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159(2-3):567-573.
20. Sohlenius B. Abundance, biomass and contribution to energy flow by soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. J. Nematol. 1980, 11:186-194.
21. The C.elegans Sequencing Consortium Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 1998, 282:2012-2018.
22. Peredney C.L., Williams P.L. Utility of Caenorhabditis elegans for assessing heavy metal contamination in artificial soil. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 39:113-118.
23. Freeman M.N., Peredney C.L., Williams P.L. A soil bioassay using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, vol. eighth, vol. ASTM STP 1364 1999, 305-318. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. D.S. Henshel, M.C. Black, M.C. Harrass (Eds.).
24. Ura T., Kai S., Sakata T., Iguchi K., Arizono K. Aquatic acute toxicity testing using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Health Sci. 2002, 48:583-586.
25. Freeman M.N., Marse T.J., Williams P.L. Establishment of quality assurance procedures for aquatic toxicity testing with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment, vol. seventh, vol. ASTM STP 1333 1998, 45-59. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. E.E. Little, A.J. Delonay, B.M. Greenberg (Eds.).
26. Groudev S.N., Spasova I.I., Georgiev P.S. In situ bioremediation of soils contaminated with radioactive elements and toxic heavy metals. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2001, 62:301-308.
27. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 2001, John Wiley and Sons.
28. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1958, 53:457-548.
29. Cruz Viggi C., Pagnanelli F., Toro L. Sulphate bioreduction for the treatment of polluted waters: solid versus liquid organic substrates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:859-863.
30. Singh R., Kumar A., Kirrolia A., Kumar R., Yadav N., Bishnoi N.R., Lohchab R.K. Removal of sulphate, COD and Cr(VI) in simulated and real wastewater by sulphate reducing bacteria enrichment in small bioreactor and FTIR study. Biores. Technol. 2011, 102(2):677-682.
31. Medusa Program by ©Ignasi Puigdomenech, 2001.
32. Waybrant K.R., Blowes D.W., Ptacek C.J. Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32:1972-1979.
33. Mayer K.U., Benner S.G., Blowes D.W. Process-based reactive transport modeling of a permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of mine drainage. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2006, 85:195-211.