Mixture screening and mixture-amount designs to determine plant growth regulator effects on shoot regeneration from grapefruit (Citrus paradisi macf.) epicotyls

In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 682-694

  Niedz, Randall P ^a   Evens, Terence J ^a  

^a U S HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adventitious shoots; Auxins; Citrus; Cytokinins; Experimental design; Mixture amount; Organogenesis; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

AGROBACTERIUM; CITRUS; CITRUS X PARADISI; RHIZOBIUM;

EID: 83855160921     PISSN: 10545476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9381-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, M. J.; Whitcomb, P. J. RSM simplified: optimizing processes using response surface methods for design of experiments. Productivity Press, New York, pp 120-121, 226-228; 2005.
2. Belsley D. A.; Kuh E.; Welsch R. E. Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley, Hoboken; 1980.
3. Box G. E. P.; Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. J Royal Stat Soc Series B 26: 211; 1964.
4. Burger D. W.; Hackett W. P. Gradients of adventitious bud formation on excised epicotyl and root sections of citrus. Plant Science 43: 229-232; 1986.
5. Cook R. D.; Weisberg S. Residuals and influence in regression. Chapman and Hall, New York; 1982.
6. Cornell J. A. Experiments with mixtures: designs, models and the analysis of mixture data, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York; 2002.
7. Costa M. G. C.; Alves V. S.; Lani E. R. G.; Mosquima P. R.; Carvalho C. R.; Otoni W. C. Morphogenic gradients of adventitious bud and shoot regeneration in epicotyl explants of citrus. Scientia Horticulturae 100: 63-74; 2004.
8. Cox D. R. A note on polynomial response functions for mixtures. Biometrika 58: 155-159; 1971.
9. Derringer G. C.; Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several variables. J. Qual. Tech 12: 214-219; 1980.
10. Duran-Vila N.; Ortega V.; Navarro L. Morphogenesis and tissue cultures of three citrus species. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 16: 123-133; 1989.
11. Evens, T. J.; Niedz, R. P. Are Hofmeister series relevant to modern ion-specific effects research? Scholarly Research Exchange, vol. 2008, Article ID 818461; 2008. doi: 10. 3814/2008/818461.
12. Evens T. J.; Niedz R. P. Optimal N: P ratios of growth media: quantification of nutrient-replete growth rates in five ion hyperspace for Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyceae) and Peridinium cinctum (Dinophyceae). Eur J Phycol 45: 247-257; 2010.
13. Grinblat U. Differentiation of citrus stem in vitro. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 97: 599-603; 1972.
14. Kobayashi A. K.; Bespalhok J. C.; Pereira L. F. P.; Vieira L. G. E. Plant regeneration of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) from thin sections of mature stem segments. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 74: 99-102; 2003.
15. Murashige T.; Tucker D. P. H. Growth factor requirements of citrus tissue culture. Proc 1st Int Citrus Symp 3: 1155-1161; 1962.
16. Myers R. H. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd ed. PWS-KENT Publishing, Boston; 1990.
17. Myers R. H.; Montgomery D. C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York; 2002.
18. Niedz R. P.; Evens T. J. Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. In Vitro Cell & Dev Biol Plant 43: 370-381; 2007.
19. Niedz R. P.; Evens T. J. The effects of nitrogen and potassium nutrition on the growth of nonembryogenic and embryogenic tissue of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). BMC Plant Biology 8: 126; 2008. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2229-8-126.
20. Niedz R. P.; Hyndman S. E.; Evens T. J. Using a gestalt to measure the quality of in vitro responses. Scientia Horticulturae 112: 349-359; 2007.
21. Paudyal K. P.; Haq N. In vitro propagation of pummelo (Citrus grandis L. Osbeck). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 36: 511-516; 2000.
22. Perez-Molphe-Balch E.; Ochoa-Alejo N. In vitro plant regeneration of Mexican lime and mandarin by direct organogenesis. HortScience 32: 931-934; 1997.
23. Skoog F.; Miller C. O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exper. Biol. 11: 118-131; 1957.
24. Smith, W. F. Experimental design for formulation. ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability, SIAM, Alexandria, VA, USA; 2005.
25. Weisberg S. Applied linear regression. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York; 1985.
26. Zou X.; Li D.; Luo X.; Luo K.; Pei Y. An improved procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) via indirect organogenesis. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant 44: 169-177; 2008.