The evidence base

Addressing Offending Behaviour: Context, Practice and Values

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 39-57

  Goodman, Anthony ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755226067     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843925705     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Appleyard, G. (1971) ‘Prison welfare?’, Howard Journal of Penology, XIII (2): 106–13.
2. Audit Commission (1989) The Probation Service: Promoting Value for Money. London: HMSO.
3. Barkley, D. and Collett, S. (2000) ‘Back to the future: housing and support for offenders’, Probation Journal, 47 (4): 235–42.
4. Biestek, F. (1963) The Casework Relationship. London: George Allen & Unwin.
5. Bochel, B. (1976) Probation and After-Care: Its Development in England and Wales. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
6. Bottoms, A. and McWilliams, W. (1979) ‘A non-treatment paradigm for probation practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 9 (2): 159–202.
7. Burnett, R. (2004) ‘One-to-one ways of promoting desistence: in search of an evidence base’, in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Developing Evidence Based Practice. Cullompton: Willan.
8. Carlisle Committee (1988) The Parole System of England and Wales: Report of the Review Committee, Cm 532. London: HMSO.
9. Chapman, T. and Hough, M. (1998) Evidence-Based Practice: A Guide to Effective Practice. London: HM Inspectorate of Probation.
10. Denney, D. (1998) Social Policy and Social Work. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Ellis, T. and Winstone, J. (2002) ‘The policy impact of a survey of programme evaluations in England and Wales’, in J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment. Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-offending. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.
13. Fitzgibbon, W. and Green, R. (2006) ‘Mentally disordered offenders: challenges in using the OASys risk assessment tool’, British Journal of Community Justice, 4 (2): 35–45.
14. Folkard, M., Smith, D. and Smith, D. (1974) Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment (IMPACT), Vol. 1, Home Office Research Study 24. London: HMSO.
15. Foren, R. and Bailey, R. (1968) Authority in Social Casework. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Garland, D. (2000) ‘The culture of high crime societies: some preconditions of recent “law and order” policies’, British Journal of Criminology, 40 (3): 347–75.
17. Goodman, A. and Loumansky, A (2006) ‘Report on Hate Crime for a Probation Area’. Unpublished.
18. Hammond, W. and Chayen, E. (1963) Persistent Criminals, Home Office Research Unit Report No. 5. London: HMSO.
19. Harper, G. and Chitty, C. (2005) The Impact of Corrections on Reoffending: A Review of What Works, Home Office Research Study 291. London: Home Office.
20. Haxby, D. (1978) Probation: A Changing Service. London: Constable.
21. Holmes, T. (1900) Pictures and Problems from London Police Courts. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
22. Home Office (1959, reprinted 1966) Penal Practice in a Changing Society, Cmnd 645. London: HMSO.
23. Home Office (March 1962) Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation Service, Cmnd 1650. London: HMSO.
24. Home Office (December 1965) The Adult Offender, Cmnd 2852. London: HMSO.
25. Home Office (1966) Residential Provision for Homeless Discharged Offenders: Report of the Working Party on the Place of Voluntary Service in After-Care. London: HMSO.
26. Home Office (1984) Probation Service in England and Wales. Statement of National Objectives and Priorities. London: HMSO.
27. Home Office (1990a) Crime, Justice and Protecting the Public, Cm 965. London: Home Office.
28. Home Office (1990b) Supervision and Punishment in the Community: A Framework for Action, Cm 966. London: Home Office.
29. Home Office (1992, 2002, 2005) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London: Home Office.
30. Home Office (May 2006) The NOMS Offender Management Model, version 2. London: Home Office.
31. Jarvis, F.V. (1972) Advise, Assist and Befriend. A History of the Probation and After-Care Service. London: National Association of Probation Officers.
32. King, J. (1969) The Probation and After-Care Service. London: Butterworths.
33. Lloyd, C. (1986) Response to SNOP. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology.
34. McGuire, J. (1995) What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
35. McGuire, J. (2000) Cognitive-Behavioural Approaches. An Introduction to Theory and Research. London: Home Office, HM Inspectorate of Probation.
36. McWilliams, B. (1983) ‘The Mission to the English Police Courts 1876–1936’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 22: 129–47.
37. McWilliams, B. (1985) ‘The Mission transformed: professionalization of probation between the wars’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24 (4): 257–74.
38. McWilliams, B. (1986) ‘The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 25 (4): 241–60.
39. McWilliams, B. (1987) ‘Probation, pragmatism and policy’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 26 (2): 97–121.
40. Mair, G. (2004) ‘The origins of what works in England and Wales: a house built on sand?, in G. Mair (ed.), What Matters in Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
41. Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? – Questions and answers about prison reform’, The Public Interest, 35: 22–54.
42. Martinson, R. (1979) ‘New findings, new views: a note of caution regarding sentencing reform’, Hofstra Law Review, (7) 2: 243–58.
43. Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44. May, T. (1991) Probation: Politics, Policy and Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
45. May, T. (1995) ‘Probation and community sanctions’, in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook in Criminology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Merrington, S. and Stanley, S. (2000) ‘Reflections: doubts about the What Works initiative’, Probation Journal, 47 (4): 272–5.
47. National Audit Office (17 May 1989) Home Office: Control and Management of Probation Services in England and Wales. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: HMSO.
48. Palmer, E. (2003) Offending Behaviour: Moral Reasoning, Criminal Conduct and the Rehabilitation of Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.
49. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
50. Radzinowicz, L. (1958) The Results of Probation. A Report of the Cambridge Department of Criminal Science. London: Macmillan.
51. Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (2001) ‘“Straight thinking on probation”: evidence-based practice and the culture of curiosity’, in G. Bernfield, D. Farrington and A. Leschied (eds), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
52. Rex, S. (2001) ‘Beyond cognitive-behaviouralism? reflections on the effectiveness literature’, in A. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds), Community Penalties: Challenges and Changes. Cullompton: Willan.
53. Rutherford, A. (1993) Criminal Justice and the Pursuit of Decency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Ryan, M. and Ward, T. (1989) Privatisation and the Penal System. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
55. Travis, A. (2007) ‘Increase in serious crime by offenders on parole’, The Guardian, 23 October.
56. Underdown, A. (1998) Strategies for Effective Offender Supervision. HM Inspectorate of Probation. London: Home Office.
57. Wilkinson, J. (2005) ‘Evaluating evidence for the effectiveness of the reasoning and rehabilitation programme’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44 (1): 70–85.