Water distribution network pressure-driven analysis using the enhanced global gradient algorithm (EGGA)

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 137, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 498-510

  Giustolisi, Orazio ^a   Laucelli, Daniele ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Leakage; Network analysis; Pipe networks; Simulation; Water distribution system; Water pipelines

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY FEATURES; DEMAND PATTERN; DEMAND-DRIVEN ANALYSIS; GRADIENT ALGORITHM; HUMAN CONTROL; HYDRAULIC SYSTEM; NODAL PRESSURES; PIPE NETWORKS; PRESSURE-DRIVEN; SIMULATION; TEST NETWORK; TOPOLOGICAL SIMPLIFICATION; WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; WATER DISTRIBUTIONS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT; LEAKAGE (FLUID); WATER PIPELINES;

WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCHARGE; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; LEAKAGE; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OUTFLOW; PIPE; TOPOLOGY; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 83755225643     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000140     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackley J.R. L. Tanyimboh T.T. Tahar B. Templeman A.B. Head-driven analysis of water distribution systems. Proc. of Computer and Control in Water Industry, Water Software Systems: Theory and Applications 2001, 183-192. B. Ulanicki, Research Studies, Leicester, UK.
2. Ang W.K. Jowitt P.W. Solution for water distribution systems under pressure-deficient conditions. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2006, 132(3):175-182. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:3(175)
3. Berardi L. Giustolisi O. Todini E. Accounting for uniformly distributed pipe demand in WDN analysis: Enhanced GGA. Urban Water J. 2010, 7(4):243-255. UWJRAU, 1573-062X, 10.1080/1573062X.2010.491550
4. Bhave P.R. Node flow analysis of water distribution systems. J. Transp. Eng. 1981, 107(4):457-467. JTPEDI, 0733-947X
5. Carpentier P. Cohen G. Hamam Y. Water network equilibrium, variational formulation and comparison of numerical algorithms. Computer application in water supply 1987, I. and Vol. Wiley, New York.
6. Chandapillai J. Realistic simulation of water distribution system. J. Transp. Eng. 1991, 117(2):258-263. JTPEDI, 0733-947X, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1991)117:2(258)
7. Collins M. Cooper L. Helgason R. Kenningston J. LeBlanc L. Solving the pipe network analysis problem using optimization techniques. Manage. Sci. 1978, 24(7):747-760. MSCIAM, 0025-1909, 10.1287/mnsc.24.7.747
8. Cross H. Analysis of flow in networks of conduits or conductors. 1936, 1-29. Bulletin No. 286, Univ. of Illinois Engineering Experimental Station, Urbana, IL.
9. Crous P.A. Van Zyl J.E. Nel A. Using stream processing to improve the speed of hydraulic network solvers. Proc., 10th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conf. 2008, 1-8. J. E. Van Zyl, A. A. Ilemobade, H. E. Jacobs, ASCE, Reston, VA.
10. Epp R. Fowler A.G. Efficient code for steady-state flows in networks. J. Hydraul. Div. 1970, 96(11):43-56. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
11. Farmani R. Savic D.A. Walters G.A. Benchmark problems for design and optimisation of water distribution systems. Proc., Advances in Water Supply Management 2000, 249-256. C. Maksimovic, D. Butler, F. A. Memon, A.A. Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands.
12. Germanopoulos G. technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models. Civil Eng. Syst. 1985, 2(3):171-179. CESYEE, 0263-0257, 10.1080/02630258508970401
13. Giustolisi O. Considering actual pipe connections in WDN analysis. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2010, 136(11):889-900. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000266
14. Giustolisi O. Kapelan Z. Savic D.A. An algorithm for automatic detection of topological changes in water distribution networks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134(4):435-446. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:4(435), and (a)
15. Giustolisi O. Kapelan Z. Savic D.A. Extended period simulation analysis considering valve shutdowns. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2008, 134(6):527-537. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:6(527)
16. Giustolisi O. Savic D.A. Kapelan Z. Pressure-driven demand and leakage simulation for water distribution networks. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134(5):626-635. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:5(626)
17. Giustolisi O. Todini E. Pipe hydraulic resistance correction in WDN analysis. Urban Water J. 2009, 6(1):39-52. UWJRAU, 1573-062X, 10.1080/15730620802541623
18. Gupta R. Bhave P.R. Comparison of methods for predicting deficient network performance. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 1996, 122(3):214-217. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:3(214)
19. Hamam Y.M. Brammeller A. Hybrid method for the solution of piping networks. Proc. IEEE 1971, 118(11):1607-1612. IEEPAD, 0018-9219
20. Isaacs L.T. Mills K.G. Linear theory method for pipe network analysis. J. Hydraul. Div. 1980, 106(7):1191-1201. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
21. Kesavan H.K. Chandrashekar M. Graph-theoretic models for pipe network analysis. J. Hydraul. Div. 1972, 98(2):345-364. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
22. Lambert A.O. Accounting for losses: The bursts and background concept (BABE). J. Inst. Water Environ. Manage. 1994, 8(2):205-214. JIWMEZ, 0951-7359, 10.1111/j.1747-6593.1994.tb00913.x
23. Martin D.W. Peters G. The application of Newton's method to network analysis by digital computers. J. Inst. Water Eng. 1963, 17:115-129. JIWEA7, 0020-3556
24. McKay M.D. Conover W.J. Beckman R.J. comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21(2):239-245. TCMTA2, 0040-1706, 10.2307/1268522
25. Osiadacz A.J. Simulation and analysis of gas networks 1987, E. & F.N. Spon, London.
26. Piller O. Modeling the behavior of network-Hydraulic analysis and sampling procedure for estimating the parameters. 1995, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Bordeaux I, Bordeaux, France.
27. Piller O. Van Zyl J.E. unified framework for pressure-driven network analysis. Proc. of Computer and Control in Water Industry, Water Management Challenges in Global Changes, Supplementary Proceedings, 2007, 25-30. B. Ulaniki, and eds., Taylor & Francis, London.
28. Piller O. Van Zyl J.E. Pressure-driven analysis of network sections via high-lying nodes. Proc. of Computer and Control in Water Industry 2009, 257-262. J. Boxal, C. Maksimovic, Taylor & Francis, London.
29. Reddy L.S. Elango K. Analysis of water distribution networks with head dependant outlets. Civil Eng. Syst. 1989, 6(3):102-110. CESYEE, 0263-0257, 10.1080/02630258908970550
30. Rossman L.A. 2000, Epanet2 users manual, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati.
31. Shamir U. Howard C.D. D. Water distribution network analysis. J. Hydraul. Div. 1968, 94(1):219-234. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
32. Tanyimboh T.T. Tabesh M. Burrows R. Appraisal of source head methods for calculating reliability of water distribution networks. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2001, 127(4):206-213. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:4(206)
33. Tanyimboh T.T. Templeman A.B. new nodal outflow function for water distribution networks. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Engineering Computation Technology (CD-ROM) 2004, and Civil-Comp, Stirling, UK.
34. Todini E. more realistic approach to the 'extended period simulation' of water distribution networks. Advances in water supply management 2003, 173-184. C. Maksimovic, D. Butler, F. A. Memon, and eds., A.A. Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands.
35. Todini E. Pilati S. gradient method for the solution of looped pipe networks. Proc., Computer Applications in Water Supply 1988, 1:1-20. Wiley, New York.
36. Tucciarelli T. Criminisi A. Termini D. Leak analysis in pipeline systems by means of optimal valve regulation. J. Hydraul. Eng. 1999, 125(3):277-285. JHEND8, 0733-9429, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:3(277)
37. Wagner J.M. Shamir U. Marks D.H. Water distribution reliability: Simulation methods. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 1988, 114(3):276-294. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1988)114:3(276)
38. Windows 7. [Computer software]. Microsoft, Inc. Seattle.
39. Wood D.J. Charles C.O. A. Hydraulic network analysis using linear theory. J. Hydraul. Div. 1972, 98(7):1157-1170. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
40. Wood D.J. Rayes A.G. Reliability of algorithms for pipe network analysis. J. Hydraul. Div. 1981, 107(10):1145-1161. JYCEAJ, 0044-796X
41. Wu Z.Y. Wang R.H. Walski T.M. Yang S.Y. Bowdler D. Baggett C.C. Efficient pressure dependent demand model for large water distribution system analysis. Proc., Eighth Water Distribution System Analysis Symp. 2006, and (CD-ROM), ASCE, Reston, VA.
42. Wu Z.Y. Wang R.H. Walski T.M. Yang S.Y. Bowdler D. Baggett C.C. Extended global-gradient algorithm for pressure-dependent water distribution analysis. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2009, 135(1):13-22. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:1(13)