Simulating nonresidential water demand with a stochastic end-use model

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 137, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 511-520

  Blokker, E J M ^a   Pieterse Quirijns, E J ^a   Vreeburg, J H G ^a   van Dijk, J C ^b  

^a KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Simulation; Stochastic models; Water demand

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE ROOMS; DESIGN STAGE; DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; DIVERSE RANGE; END-USES; INPUT PARAMETER; MODULAR APPROACH; NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; NURSING HOMES; PEAK FLOWS; RESIDENTIAL WATER DEMAND; SIMULATION; SPATIAL SCALE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; TIME-SCALES; WATER DEMAND; WATER USE;

FLOW MEASUREMENT; OFFICE BUILDINGS; STATISTICS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; WATER SUPPLY;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMAND ANALYSIS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY; WATER DEMAND;

EID: 83755224894     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000146     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baggelaar P.K. Geudens P.J. J. G. Prognoses landelijke drinkwatervraag tot 2025. 2008, and 2008/85/6222, Vewin, Rijswijk, Netherlands.
2. Blokker E.J. M. Stochastic water demand modelling for better understanding of hydraulics in water distribution networks. 2010, Ph.D. thesis, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
3. Blokker E.J. M. Beverloo H. Vogelaar A.J. Vreeburg J.H. G. van Dijk J.C. A bottom-up approach of stochastic demand allocation in a hydraulic network model: A sensitivity study of model parameters. J. Hydroinf. 2011, 13(4):714-728. 1464-7141, 10.2166/hydro.2011.067
4. Blokker E.J. M. Buchberger S.G. Vreeburg J.H. G. van Dijk J.C. Comparison of water demand models: PRP and SIMDEUM applied to Milford, Ohio, data. Proc., Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2008 2008, 182-195. J. E. van Zyl, A. A. Ilemobade, H. E. Jacobs, and (a). and eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
5. Blokker E.J. M. Buchberger S.G. Vreeburg J.H. G. van Dijk J.C. Importance of demand modelling in network water quality models: A review. Drinking Water Eng. Sci. 2008, 1(1):27-38. DWESAP, 1996-9465, 10.5194/dwes-1-27-2008
6. Blokker E.J. M. Vreeburg J.H. G. Beverloo H. Klein Arfman M. van Dijk J.C. A bottom-up approach of stochastic demand allocation in water quality modelling. Drinking Water Eng. Sci. 2010, 3(1):43-51. DWESAP, 1996-9465, 10.5194/dwes-3-43-2010
7. Blokker E.J. M. Vreeburg J.H. G. Schaap P.G. van Dijk J.C. The self-cleaning velocity in practice. Proc., Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2010 2010, and (b). ASCE, Reston, VA.
8. Blokker E.J. M. Vreeburg J.H. G. van Dijk J.C. Simulating residential water demand with a stochastic end-use model. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2010, 136(1):19-26. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000002, JWRMD5, 0733-9496
9. Bosch N. Deelen A. Euwals R. Is part-time employment here to stay? Working hours of Dutch women over successive generations. Labour 2010, 24(1):35-54. 1467-9914, 10.1111/j.1467-9914.2010.00470.x
10. Buchberger S.G. Carter J.T. Lee Y.H. Schade T.G. Random demands, travel times, and water quality in dead ends. 2003, and AWWARF Rep. 90963F, American Water Works Association Research Foundation (AWWARF), Denver.
11. Geudens P.J. J. G. Water supply statistics 2007. 2008, 2008/83/6259, Vewin, Rijswijk, Netherlands.
12. Pieterse-Quirijns E.J. Blokker E.J. M. Van der Blom E. Vreeburg J.H. G. Modelling characteristic values for non-residential water use. Proc., Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2010 2010, and ASCE, Reston, VA.
13. Pieterse-Quirijns E.J. Blokker E.J. M. Vogelaar A.J. Modelleren van niet-huishoudelijk waterverbruik; waterverbruik van kantoren, hotels, zorginstellingen en veehouderij. 2009, and BTO 2009.013, KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
14. Vreeburg J. Discolouration in drinking water systems; the role of particles clarified 2010, IWA Publishing, London.