Assessment of software development tools for safety-critical real-time systems

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-6

  Kornecki, Andrew ^a   Zalewski, Janusz ^b  

^a EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Real time systems; Safety related systems; Software safety; Software tools

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE TESTING; TAXONOMIES;

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATIONS; DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT; EVALUATING SOFTWARE; MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES; SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLES; SOFTWARE SAFETY;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 83755198996     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)33705-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Abel D. E., T. P. Rout (1993), Defining and Specifying the Quality Attributes of Software Products, The Australian Computer Journal, Vol. 25, pp. 105-112.
2. Barbacci M. R., M. H. Klein, T. A. Longstaff, C. B. Weinstock (1995), Quality Attributes, Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-021, Software Engineering institute, Pittsburgh, Penn., USA.
3. FAA (1991), Software Quality Metrics, Report DOT/FAA/CT-91/1, FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ, USA.
4. Firth R. et al. (1987), A Guide to the Classification and Assessment of Software Engineering Tools, Technical Report CMU/SEI-87-TR-I0, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, Penn., USA.
5. IEEE Std. 982.1(1988), Standard Dictionary of Measures to Produce Reliable Software, IEEE, New York, USA.
6. IEEE Std 1175 (1992a), Trial-use Standard Reference Model for Computing System Tool Interconnections, IEEE, New York, USA.
7. IEEE Std 1209 (1992b), Recommended Practice for the Evaluation and Selection of CASE Tools, IEEE, New York, USA.
8. IEEE Std, 1061(1998), Software Quality Metrics Methodology, IEEE, New York, USA.
9. Ihme T. et al. (1998a), CASE Tool Evaluation, Proc. DASIA Conf. On Data Systems in Aerospace, Athens, Greece, pp. 121-126.
10. Ihme T. et al. (1998b), Developing Application Frameworks for Mission-Critical Software: Using Space Application, Research Notes 1933, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
11. ISO/IEC 9126(1991), Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation - Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. ISO/IEC 14102(1995), Information Technology Guideline for the Evaluation and Selection of CASE Toots, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. Locke CD, at el. (1990). Generic Avionics Software Specification, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-8, Pittsburgh, Penn., USA.
14. RTCA (1992), Software Considerations in Aiborne Systems and Equipment Certification, Report RTCA/DO-178B, Washington, DC, USA.
15. Sherry L., A. Suarez, P. Wolfe (1998), Application of CASE Tools in the Development of Commercial Avionics Software. Proc. SMC'98 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, pp. 875-880.
16. Wichmann B. (1999), Guidance for the Adoption of Toots for Use in Safety Related Software Development, Draft Report, British Computer Society, London, UK.