English law for the surgeon II: Clinical negligence

Head and Neck Oncology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Jerjes, Waseem ^a,b   Mahil, Jaspal ^c   Upile, Tahwinder ^c,d  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOLAM PRINCIPLE; BOLITHO PRINCIPLE; CIVIL LAW; CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LAW; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEGLIGENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGEON; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; EUROPEAN UNION; GENERAL SURGERY; LEGAL ASPECT; MALPRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; UNITED KINGDOM;

EUROPEAN UNION; GENERAL SURGERY; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALPRACTICE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 83755184425     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17583284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-52     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Medicine, Patients and the Law. Brazier M, Cave E, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 4 2007 155 184
2. Maynard v. West Midlands Regional Health Authority, 1984 1 WLR 634 at 638, HL
3. Medical Negligence. Jones MA, Sweet & Maxwell 3 2003
4. General Medical Council, Good Medical Practice, 2006 para 11
5. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee, 1957 1 WLR 582, 587
6. Hunter v Hanley, 1955 SC 200 at 206
7. Donoghue v Stevenson, 1932 AC 562
8. Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v Heller & Partners Ltd, 1964 AC 465
9. Akenzua v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2002 EWCA Civ 1470, (2003) 1 WLR 741
10. Palmer v Tees Health Authority, 1998 All ER 180; (1999) Lloyd's Medical Reports 151 (CA)
11. Phillips v William Whiteley Ltd, 1938 1 All ER 566
12. Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority, 1985 1 All ER 635
13. Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital, 1968 1 All ER 1068
14. Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital, 1969 1 QB 428
15. Knight v Home Office, 1990 3 All ER 237
16. Brooks v Home Office, 1999 48 BMLR 109
17. Whitehouse v Jordan, 1981 1 All ER 267
18. Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors, 1985 AC 871
19. Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority, 1987 2 All ER 909
20. Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority, 1988 AC 1074
21. Jones v Manchester Corporation, 1952 2 All ER 125
22. Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital, The Times, 1953
23. Albrighton v RPA Hospital, 1980 2 NSWLR 542
24. De Freitas v O'Brian, 1995 25 BMLR 51, [1995] 6 Med LR108, CA
25. Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority, 1997 4 All ER 771
26. McGhee v National Coal Board, 1972 3 All ER 1008, 1 WLR 1
27. Penney v East Kent Health Authority, 2000 55 BMLR 63, [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 41
28. Hatcher v Black, The Times, 1954
29. Are the Courts Excessively Differential to the Medical Profession? Woolf Lord, 9 Medical Review 1 2001
30. A v Burne, 2006 EWCA Civ 24 at para 10
31. Hunter v Hanley, 1955 SLT 213
32. The Compensation Act 2006, Section 1.
33. The role of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: a shift from the Bolam standard? Samanta A, Mello MM, Foster C, Tingle J, Samanta J, Med Law Rev 2006 14 3 321 66 Autumn 10.1093/medlaw/fwl010 16901977 (Pubitemid 44659306)
34. The CPR came into effect on 26 April 1999.
35. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland, 1993 1 All ER 821
36. Burke v General Medical Council (defendant) and Disability Rights Commission (interested party) and the Official Solicitor (intervenor), 2005 EWCA 103
37. "How does medical evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence?". Hurwitz B, British Medical Journal 2004 329 7473 1024 8 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1024 15514351 (Pubitemid 39486261)
38. Mason & McCall Smith's; Law and Medical Ethics. 7317