Dynamic spectrum sharing in femtocells: A comparison of selfish versus altruistic strategies

IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Costa, Gustavo W O ^a   Garcia, Luis G U ^a   Cattoni, Andrea F ^a   Pedersen, Klaus I ^b   Mogensen, Preben E ^a,b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carrier Aggregation; Femtocells; Self organizing; Spectrum Sharing

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC SPECTRUM; DYNAMIC SPECTRUM SHARING; FEMTOCELLS; GAINING MOMENTUM; GAME-THEORETIC MODEL; PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS; SELF ORGANIZING; SPECTRUM SHARING; SYSTEM LEVEL SIMULATION;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

GAME THEORY;

EID: 83755171744     PISSN: 15502252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VETECF.2011.6093055     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. L. Garcia, G. Costa, A. Cattoni, K. Pedersen, and P. Mogensen, "Selforganizing coalitions for conflict evaluation and resolution in femtocells," in GLOBECOM 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2010, pp. 1-6.
2. J. Ellenbeck, C. Hartmann, and L. Berlemann, "Decentralized inter-cell interference coordination by autonomous spectral reuse decisions," in Wireless Conference, 2008. EW 2008. 14th European, 2008, pp. 1-7.
3. G. da Costa, A. Cattoni, I. Kovacs, and P. Mogensen, "A scalable spectrum-sharing mechanism for local area network deployment," Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1630-1645, May 2010.
4. Z. Khan, J. Lehtomaki, M. Latva-aho, and L. DaSilva, "On selfish and altruistic coalition formation in cognitive radio networks," in Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks Communications (CROWNCOM), 2010 Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on, 2010, pp. 1-5.
5. R. M. Nelissen, D. S. van Someren, and M. Zeelenberg, "Take it or leave it for something better? responses to fair offers in ultimatum bargaining," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1227-1231, 2009.
6. C. Stephens, "Modelling reciprocal altruism," The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 533-551, 1996.
7. Z. Ho and D. Gesbert, "Balancing egoism and altruism on interference channel: The mimo case," in Communications (ICC), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, May 2010, pp. 1-5.
8. V. Chandrasekhar, J. Andrews, and A. Gatherer, "Femtocell networks: a survey," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 59-67, 2008.
9. S. Parkvall, A. Furuskar, and E. Dahlman, "Evolution of lte toward imtadvanced," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 84-91, 2011.
10. D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory. MIT Press, 1991.
11. M. O. Jackson, "A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency," EconWPA, Game Theory and Information 0303011, Mar. 2003.
12. P. Kysti, et al. "IST-WINNER D1.1.2, "WINNER II Channel Models", ver 1.1," Winner II, Tech. Rep., 2007. [Online]. Available: https://www.ist-winner.org/WINNER2-Deliverables/D1.1.2v1.1.pdf
13. P. E. Mogensen et al., "LTE Capacity Compared to the Shannon Bound," in VTC Spring, April 2007.