Extracting connected concepts from biomedical texts using fog index

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue , 2011, Pages 70-76

  Shams, Rushdi ^a   Mercer, Robert E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computational Linguistics; Connected Concepts; Fog Index; Text mining; Text Readability

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755169055     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.584     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Yuan F, Wang R, Guan M, He G. A Novel Computational Method for Predicting Disease Genes Based on Functional Similarity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010; 6216:42-51.
2. Zhao S. Named Entity Recognition in Biomedical Texts using an HMM Model. International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and Its Applications 2004, Geneva, Switzerland; 84-87.
3. Kazama J, Makino T, Ohta Y, Tsujii J. Tuning Support Vector Machines for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition. ACL-02 Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain 2002, Philadelphia, USA; 3:1-8.
4. Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Andrade M. Literature and Genome Data Mining for Prioritizing Disease-Associated Genes. Discover-ing Bimolecular Mechanisms with Computational Biology (Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit II) 2006; 74-81.
5. Dai H, Chang Y, Tsai RT, Hsu W. New Challenges for Biological Text-Mining in the Next Decade, Journal of Computer Science and Technology 2010; 25:1:169-179.
6. Lindsay R, Gordon M. Literature-Based Discovery by Lexical Statistics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999; 50:7:574-587.
7. Agarwal S, Yu H. Automatically Classifying Sentences in Full-text Biomedical Articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:23:3174-3180.
8. Frunza O, Inkpen D. Extraction of Disease-Treatment Semantic Relations from Biomedical Sentences. 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, ACL 2010 2010, Uppsala, Sweden; 91-98.
9. Leroy G, Chen H, Martinez JD. A Shallow Parser based on Closed-class Words to Capture Relations in Biomedical Text. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2003; 36:145-158. (Pubitemid 37393344)
10. Sherman AL. Analytics of literature: A Manual for the Objective Study of English Prose and Poetry. Boston: Ginn and Co; 1893.
11. Gunning R. Fog Index after Twenty Years. Journal of Business Communication 1969; 6:3:3-13.
12. Goh OS, Fung CC, Depickere A, Wong KW. Using Gunning-Fog Index to Assess Instant Message Readability from ECAs. 3rd International Conference on Natural Computation (ICNC 2007) 2007, Hainan, China; 480-486.
13. Swanson DR. Fish Oil, Raynauds Syndrome, and Undiscovered Public Knowledge. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1986; 30:7-18.
14. Swanson DR. A Second Example of Mutually Isolated Medical Literatures related by Implicit, Unnoticed Connections. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1989; 40:432-435.
15. Rosario B, Hearst MA. Classifying Semantic Relations in Bioscience Texts. 42nd Annual Meeting of Association for Computational Linguistics 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
16. Smith L et al. Overview of BioCreative II Gene Mention Recognition, Genome Biology 2008; 9:2.
17. Krallinger M et al. Overview of the Protein-Protein Interaction Annotation Extraction Task of BioCreative II, Genome Biology 2008; 9:2.
18. Du y TM, Kabance P. Testing a Readable Writing Approach to Text Revision. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982; 74:733-748.
19. Tsuruoka Y et al. Developing a Robust Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text. Lecture Notes on Computer Science 2005; 3746:382-392.
20. Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). UMLS Terminology Services (UTS); Available at: https://uts.nlm.nih.gov/home.html [August 3, 2011].