Test ban: Policy of the journal of alternative and complementary medicine with regard to an increasingly common statistical error

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1093-1094

  Aickin, Mikel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CONSENSUS; EDITORIAL; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NULL HYPOTHESIS; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STUDENT T TEST;

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; EDITORIAL POLICIES; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 83655192874     PISSN: 10755535     EISSN: 15577708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/acm.2011.0878     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Nieuwenhuis S, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers E-J. Erroneous analysis of interactions: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience 2011;14:1105-1107.
2. Gelman A, Stern H. The difference between "significant" and "not significant" is not itself statistically significant. Am Statistician 2006;60:328-331. (Pubitemid 44727242)