Adenomiosi: Dal segno alla diagnosi. Imaging, errori diagnostici e diagnostica differenziale: Pictorial review;Erratum: Adenomyosis: from the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: A pictorial review (Radiologia Medica (DOI 10.1007/s11547-011-0714-5));Adenomyosis: From the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: A pictorial review;Adenomiosi: Dal segno alla diagnosi. Imaging, errori diagnostici e diagnostica differenziale: pictorial review

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1267-1287

  Valentini, A L ^a   Speca, S ^a   Gui, B ^a   Soglia, B G ^a   Micco M ^a   Bonomo, L ^a  

^a Istituto di Radiologia di Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma   (Italy)

Author keywords

Female pelvic pain; Hysterosalpingography; Infertility; Magnetic resonance imaging; Transvaginal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; MYOMETRIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOMETRIOSIS; ENDOMETRIUM; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MYOMETRIUM; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 83655191981     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0726-1     Document Type: Erratum

References (27)

1. C.C. Bird T.W. McElin P. Manalo Estrella 1972 The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus revisited Am J Obstet Gynecol 112 583 593 5059589 1:STN:280:DyaE387htVajsg%3D%3D
2. C. Bergeron F. Amant A. Ferency 2006 A pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 511 521 16563870 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.016 (Pubitemid 44688626)
3. Silverberg S, Kurman R (1992) Tumor-like lesions. In: Rosai J (ed) Tumor of the uterine corpus and gestational trophoblastic disease. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, pp 210-212
4. P. Vercellini P. Viganò E. Somigliana, et al. 2006 Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 465 477 16563868 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.017 (Pubitemid 44688627)
5. D. Utsunomiya S. Notsute Y. Hayashida, et al. 2004 Endometrial carcinoma in adenomyosis: assessment of myometrial invasion on T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 399 404 14736670 (Pubitemid 38116582)
6. H. Peric I.S. Fraser 2006 The symptomatology of adenomyosis Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 547 555 16515888 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.006 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rkslOksw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44688621)
7. Pensa A, Favaro G (1970) Trattato di anatomia umana sistematica. Utet, Torino
8. K. Tamai K. Togashy T. Ito, et al. 2005 MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls Radiographics 25 21 40 15653584 10.1148/rg.251045060 (Pubitemid 40186937)
9. O. Wéry A. Thille U. Gaspard, et al. 2005 Adenomyosis: update on a frequent but difficult diagnosis J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 34 633 648 (Pubitemid 43274191)
10. P.M. Baker P.B. Clement D.A. Bell R.H. Young 1999 Superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a report of 20 cases of a process that may be confused with endocervical glandular dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ Int J Gynecol Pathol 18 198 205 12090586 10.1097/00004347-199907000-00002 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zkslOgtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29306974)
11. M. Dueholm 2006 Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 569 682 16545618 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.005 (Pubitemid 44688620)
12. C. Reinhold F. Tafazoli A. Mehio, et al. 1999 Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation Radiographics 19 S147 S160 10517451
13. W.L. Simpson L. Beitia J. Mester 2006 Hysterosalpingography: a re-emerging study Radiographics 26 419 443 16549607 10.1148/rg.262055109 (Pubitemid 43515315)
14. N.M. De Souza I.C. Hawley J.E. Schwieso, et al. 1994 The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical coil AJR Am J Roentgenol 163 607 612 (Pubitemid 24294369)
15. C. Faquhar I. Brosens 2006 Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 603 616 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.012 (Pubitemid 44688625)
16. L. Fedele E. Bianchi R. Raffaelli, et al. 1997 Treatment of adenomyosis associated menorrhagia with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device Fertil Steril 68 426 429 9314908 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00245-8 1:STN:280: DyaK2svmtVGhtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27412906)
17. M. Igarashi Y. Abe M. Fukuda, et al. 2000 Novel conservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with danazol-loaded intrauterine device Fertil Steril 74 412 413 10927074 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00624-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3cvht1Wgsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30604216)
18. M. Furuhashy M. Miyabe Y. Katsumata, et al. 1998 Comparison of complication of vaginal hysterectomy in patients with leiomyomas and in patients with adenomyosis Arch Gynecol Obstet 262 69 73 10.1007/s004040050230 (Pubitemid 28562846)
19. S.K. Verma C.F. Gonsalves O.H. Baltarowich, et al. 2010 Spectrum of imaging findings on MRI and CT after uterine artery embolization Abdom Imaging 35 118 128 19048334 10.1007/s00261-008-9483-6
20. J.P. Pelage D. Jacob A. Fazel, et al. 2005 Midterm results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: initial experience Radiology 234 948 953 15681687 10.1148/radiol.2343031697 (Pubitemid 40250842)
21. G.P. Siskin M.E. Tublin B.F. Stainken, et al. 2001 Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis clinical response and evaluation with MRI imaging AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 297 302 11461849 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MvhtF2gug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32660482)
22. N.T. Sanghi R.H. Hawes 1994 High-intensity focused ultrasound Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 4 383 395 (Pubitemid 24113434)
23. J. Rabinovici E.A. Stewart 2006 New interventional techniques for adenomyosis Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 20 617 636 16934530 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.02.002 (Pubitemid 44688630)
24. K. Hyninen W.R. Freund H.E. Cline, et al. 1996 A clinical non-invasive MR imaging-monitored ultrasound surgery method Radiographics 16 185 195 (Pubitemid 126448421)
25. K. Kinkel K.A. Frei C. Balleyguier C. Chapron 2006 Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review Eur Radiol 16 285 298 16155722 10.1007/s00330-005-2882-y (Pubitemid 43149627)
26. M. Katayama T. Masui S. Kpbayashy, et al. 2001 Evaluation of pelvic adhesions using multiphase and multislide MR imaging with kinematic display AJR Am J Roentgenol 177 107 110 11418407 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MznsFKlsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32578060)
27. R. Manfredi P. Mirk G. Maresca, et al. 2004 Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning Radiology 231 372 378 15031434 10.1148/radiol.2312021184 (Pubitemid 38552891)