Development and validation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) angiographic scoring tool (FAST) to improve the angiographic grading and selection of intermediate lesions that require FFR assessment

Coronary Artery Disease

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-50

  Hoole, Stephen P ^a   Seddon, Michael D ^a   Poulter, Rohan S ^a   Starovoytov, Andrew ^a   Wood, David A ^a   Saw, Jacqueline ^a  

^a VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

coronary stenosis; fractional flow reserve; fractional flow reserve angiographic scoring tool; quantitative coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; COST CONTROL; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE ANGIOGRAPHIC SCORING TOOL; HUMAN; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 83655184678     PISSN: 09546928     EISSN: 14735830     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834e4f71     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503-1516. (Pubitemid 46588415)
2. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008; 117:1283-1291. (Pubitemid 351365675)
3. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, de Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2816-2821.
4. Pijls NH, de Bruyne B, Peels K, van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJJ, Koolen JJ. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:1703-1708. (Pubitemid 26193622)
5. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2105-2111. (Pubitemid 46771047)
6. Bech GJ, de Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001; 103:2928-2934. (Pubitemid 32578130)
7. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224.
8. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:177-184.
9. Nair P, Gruberg L, Beyar R. The eccentric lumenology. Acute Card Care 2006; 8:87-94. (Pubitemid 44034759)
10. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB 3rd, Loop FD, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 1988; 78:486-502.
11. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005; 1:219-227.
12. Ganz W. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med 1985; 313:1018. (Pubitemid 15250225)
13. Mahmarian JJ, Pratt CM, Boyce TM, Verani MS. The variable extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients with single vessel coronary artery disease: quantification by thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17:355-362.
14. Alderman EL, Stadius M. The angiographic definitions of the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation. Coron Artery Dis 1992; 3: 1189-1207.
15. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 587-592. (Pubitemid 15141963)
16. Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, de Soyza N. Coronary angiogram interpretation. Interobserver variability. JAMA 1978; 240:2053-2056. (Pubitemid 9080917)
17. Steigen TK, Claudio C, Abbott D, Schulzer M, Burton J, Tymchak W, et al. Angiographic core laboratory reproducibility analyses: implications for planning clinical trials using coronary angiography and left ventriculography end-points. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 24: 453-462.
18. Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:450-456. (Pubitemid 46215544)
19. Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:636-643.
20. Piek JJ, van Liebergen RA, Koch KT, Peters RJ, David GK. Clinical, angiographic and hemodynamic predictors of recruitable collateral flow assessed during balloon angioplasty coronary occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:275-282. (Pubitemid 27059955)
21. Melikian N, Cuisset T, Hamilos M, de Bruyne B. Fractional flow reserve: the influence of the collateral circulation. Int J Cardiol 2009; 132: e109-e110.
22. Iqbal MB, Shah N, Khan M, Wallis W. Reduction in myocardial perfusion territory and its effect on the physiological severity of a coronary stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3:89-90.
23. Ilegbusi OJ, Hu Z, Nesto R, Waxman S, Cyganski D, Kilian J, et al. Determination of blood flow and endothelial shear stress in human coronary artery in vivo. J Invasive Cardiol 1999; 11:667-674.
24. Dinerman JL, Mehta JL. Endothelial, platelet and leukocyte interactions in ischemic heart disease: insights into potential mechanisms and their clinical relevance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:207-222. (Pubitemid 20217066)