The effects of rose bengal- and erythrosine-mediated photodynamic therapy on Candida albicans

Mycoses

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 56-63

  Costa, Anna Carolina Borges Pereira ^a   Rasteiro, Vanessa Maria Campos ^a   Pereira, Cristiane Aparecida ^a   Rossoni, Rodnei Dennis ^a   Junqueira, Juliana Campos ^a   Jorge, Antonio Olavo Cardoso ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biofilm; Candida albicans; Erythrosine; Light emitting diode; Photodynamic therapy; Rose bengal

Indexed keywords

AGAR; ERYTHROSINE; GLUCOSE; ROSE BENGAL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CANDIDIASIS; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONIDIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS CULTURE; FUNGUS HYPHAE; HUMAN; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE; NONHUMAN; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PLANKTON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; BIOFILMS; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CANDIDIASIS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; ERYTHROSINE; HYPHAE; LIGHT; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHOTOCHEMOTHERAPY; ROSE BENGAL; SPORES, FUNGAL;

CANDIDA ALBICANS;

EID: 83655163917     PISSN: 09337407     EISSN: 14390507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02042.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Naglik JR, Fidel PL Jr, Odds FC. Animal models of mucosal Candida infection. FEMS Yeast Res 2008; 283: 129-39.
2. Seneviratne CJ, Jin L, Samaranayake LP. Biofilm lifestyle of Candida: a mini review. Oral Dis 2008; 14: 582-90.
3. Lamfon H, Porter SR, McCullough M, Pratten J. Susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms grown in a constant depth film fermentor to chlorhexidine, fluconazole and miconazole: a longitudinal study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 53: 383-5.
4. Ramage G, Bachmann S, Patterson TF, Wickes BL, Lopez-Ribot JL. Investigation of multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemotherapy 2002; 49: 973-80.
5. Samaranayake YH, Ye J, Yau JYY, Cheung BPK, Samaranayake LP. In vitro method to study antifungal perfusion in Candida biofilms. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 818-25.
6. Chabrier-Roselló Y, Foster TH, Pérez-Nazario N, Mitra S, Haidaris CG. Sensitivity of Candida albicans germ tubes and biofilms to photofrin-mediated phototoxicity. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 4288-95.
7. Sant'Ana PL, Milan EP, Martinez R et al. Multicenter Brazilian study of oral Candida species isolated from AIDS patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97: 253-7.
8. Konopka K, Goslinski T. Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 694-707.
9. Zanin ICJ, Gonçalves RB, Junior AB, Hope CK, Pratten J. Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 324-30.
10. Peloi LS, Soares RRS, Biondo CEG, Souza VR, Hioka N, Kimura E. Photodynamic effect of light emitting-diode light on cell growth inhibition induced by methylene blue. J Biosci 2008; 33: 231-7.
11. Soares BM, Silva DL, Sousa GR et al. In vitro photodynamic inactivation of Candida spp. growth and adhesion to buccal epithelial cells. Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2009; 94: 65-70.
12. Paulino TP, Ribeiro KF, Thedei G Jr, Tedesco AC, Ciancaglini P. Use of hand held photopolymerizer to photoinactivate Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 2005; 50: 353-9.
13. Wood S, Metcalf D, Devine D, Robinson C. Erythrosine is a potential photosensitizer for the photodynamic therapy of oral plaque biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57: 680-4.
14. Allaker RP, Douglas CWI. Novel anti-microbial therapies for dental plaque related-diseases. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 33: 8-13.
15. Metcalf D, Robinson C, Devine D, Wood S. Enhancement of erythrosine-mediated photodynamic therapy of Streptococcus mutans biofilms by light fractionation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 190-2.
16. Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Effect of cell-photosensitizer binding and cell density on microbial photoinactivation. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2329-35.
17. Parahitiyawa NB, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP et al. Interspecies variation in Candida biofilm formation studied using the Calgary biofilm device. APMIS 2009; 114: 298-306.
18. Souza SC, Junqueira JC, Balducci I, Ito-Koga CY, Munin E, Jorge AOC. Photosensitization of different Candida species by low power laser light. Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2006; 83: 34-38.
19. Nobile CJ, Mitchell AP. Genetics and genomics of Candida albicans biofilm formation. Cell Microbiol 2006; 82: 1382-91.
20. Ramage G, Walle KV, Wickes BL, Lópes-Ribot JL. Biofilm formation by Candida dubliniensis. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 3234-40.
21. Hawser SP, Douglas LJ. Resistence of Candida albicans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 2128-31.
22. Bliss JM, Bigelow CE, Foster TH, Haidaris CG. Susceptibility of Candida species to photodynamic effects of photofrin. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 2000-6.
23. Douglas LJ. Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol 2003; 11: 30-36.
24. Blankenship JR, Mitchell AP. How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective. Curr Opin Microbiol 2006; 9: 588-94.
25. Lambrechts SAG, Aalders MCG, Marle JV. Mechanistic study of the photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans by a cationic porphyrin. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2026-34.
26. Cormick MP, Alvarez MG, Rovera M, Durantini EN. Photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans sensitized by tri- and tetra- cationic porphyrin derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 2009; 44: 1592-9.
27. Giroldo LM, Felipe MP, Oliveira MA, Munin E, Alves LP, Costa MS. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) with methylene blue increases membrane permeability in Candida albicans. Lasers Med Sci 2009; 24: 109-12.
28. Munin E, Giroldo LM, Alves LP, Costa MS. Study of germ tube formation by Candida albicans after photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2007; 88: 16-20.