Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot

Gut

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 101-107

  Moss, S M ^a   Campbell, C ^b   Melia, J ^a   Coleman, D ^a   Smith, S ^c   Parker, R ^d   Ramsell, P ^d   Patnick, J ^e   Weller, D P ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d Ryde Ward   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCULT BLOOD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CODING; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ISOLATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PILOT PROJECTS; POVERTY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 83555179239     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: 14683288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.236430     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group. Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ 2004;329:133.
2. Steele RJC, McClements PL, Libby G, et al. Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBt screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 2009;58:530-5.
3. Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer 2007;97:1601-5. (Pubitemid 350249359)
4. Weller D, Alexander F, Orbell S, et al. Evaluation of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot. A Report for the UK Department of Health, 2003. http://www. cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/pilot.html.
5. Weller D, Moss S, Butler P, et al. English Pilot of Bowel Cancer Screening: an Evaluation of the Second Round 2006. http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/bowel/pilot.html.
6. Weller D, Moss S, Melia J, et al. Evaluation of the 3rd Round of the English Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot. Report to the NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. 2009. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/pilot.html (to go online at time of paper publication).
7. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Indices of Deprivation 2004, 2006. http:// www.odpm.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1128440. 23-2-2006. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
8. Census Dissemination Unit Website Homepage. http://census.ac.uk/cdu. 2006. (accessed 23 Feb 2006). Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
9. Day NE. Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test. J Epidemiol Community Health 1985;39:364-6. (Pubitemid 16211334)
10. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-7. (Pubitemid 26400242)
11. Steele RJ, Kostourou I, McClements P, et al. Effect of gender, age and deprivation on key performance indicators in a FOBT-based colorectal screening programme. J Med Screen 2010;17:68-74.
12. Steele RJ, Kostourou I, McClements P, et al. Effect of repeated invitations on uptake of colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: analysis of prevalence and incidence screening. BMJ 2010;341:c5531.
13. Malila N, Oivanen T, Malminiemi O, et al. Test, episode, and programme sensitivities of screening for colorectal cancer as a public health policy in Finland: experimental design. BMJ 2008;337:a2261.
14. Szczepura A, Price C, Gumber A. Breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns over 15 years for UK south Asian ethnic minority populations, corrected for differences in socio-demographic characteristics. BMC Public Health 2008;8:346.
15. Price CL, Szczepura AK, Gumber AK, et al. Comparison of breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns in a common cohort of South Asian women in England. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:103.
16. van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2008;135:82-90. (Pubitemid 351899018)
17. Hol L, Wilschut JA, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. Br J Cancer 2009;100:1103-10.
18. Federici A, Giorgi Rossi P, Borgia P, et al. The immunochemical faecal occult blood test leads to higher compliance than the guaiac for colorectal cancer screening programmes: a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen 2005;12:83-8. (Pubitemid 40835139)
19. Hol L, van Leerdam ME, van Ballegooijen M, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: randomised trial comparing quaiac-based and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gut 2010;59:62-8.
20. Hoffman RM, Steel S, Yee EF, et al. Colorectal cancer screening adherence is higher with fecal immunochemical tests than guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests: a randomized, controlled trial. Prev Med 2010;50:297-9.
21. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375:1624-33.
22. Lejeune C, Sassi F, Ellis L, et al. Socio-economic disparities in access to treatment and their impact on colorectal cancer survival. Int J Epidemiol 2010;39:710-17.
23. Ellul P, Fogden E, Simpson CL, et al. Downstaging of colorectal cancer by the National Bowel Cancer Screening programme in England: first round data from the first centre. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:420-2.
24. von Wagner C, Good A, Wright D, et al. Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England. Br J Cancer 2009;101(Suppl 2):S60-3.
25. Norwood MG, Mann CD, Hemingway D, et al. Colorectal cancer: presentation and outcome in British South Asians. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:745-9.
26. Weller DP, Campbell C. Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control. Br J Cancer 2009;101(Suppl 2):S55-9.
27. Power E, Miles A, von Wagner C, et al. Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation. Future Oncol 2009;5:1371-88.
28. Damery S, Clifford S, Wilson S. Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11:20.
29. Taskila T, Wilson S, Damery S, et al. Factors affecting attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening in the primary care population. Br J Cancer 2009;101:250-5.
30. Quarini C, Gosney M. Review of the evidence for a colorectal cancer screening programme in elderly people. Age Ageing 2009;38:503-8.
31. Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Int J Cancer 2008;122:1357-67. (Pubitemid 351287237)
32. Hoff G, Dominitz JA. Contrasting US and European approaches to colorectal cancer screening: which is best? Gut 2010;59:407-14.
33. Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, et al. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;30:38-57.
34. Weller DP, Patnick J, McIntosh HM, et al. Uptake in cancer screening programmes. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:693-9.