Do integrated record systems lead to integrated services? An observational study of a multi-professional system in a diabetes service

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-52

  Featherstone, Imogen ^a   Keen, Justin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Electronic health records; Medical record systems, computerized; Observation; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEMS; OBSERVATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

INTEGRATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PATIENT TREATMENT; RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

HEALTH;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

DIABETES MELLITUS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 83555177320     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ludwick D.A., Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. IJMI 2009, 78(1):22-31.
2. Goldzweig C.L., Towfigh A., Maglione M., Shekelle P.G. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff. 2009, 28(2):282-293.
3. Goroll A.H., Simon S.R., Tripathi M., Ascenzo C., Bates D.W. Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts e-health collaborative experience. JAMIA 2009, 16:132-139.
4. Chen C., Garrido T., Chock D., Okawa G., Liang L. The Kaiser Permanente electronic health record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff. 2009, 28(2):323-333.
5. Mäenpää T., Suominen T., Asikainen P., Maass M., Rostila I. The outcomes of regional healthcare information systems in health care: a review of the research literature. IJMI 2009, 78(11):757-771.
6. Christensen M.C. Information and communications technology in U.S. health care: why is adoption so slow and is slower better?. J. Health Polit. Policy Law 2009, 34(6):1011-1034.
7. Tjora A.H., Scambler G. Square pegs in round holes: information systems, hospitals and the significance of contextual awareness. Soc. Sci. Med. 2009, 68(3):519-525.
8. Vedvik E., Tjora A.H., Faxvaag A. Beyond the EPR: complementary roles of the hospital-wide electronic health record and clinical departmental systems. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. June 2009, 9:29. (Internet). 10.1186/1472-6947-9-29.
9. Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S., Maglione M., Mojica W., Roth E., Morton S.C., Shekelle P.G. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144:E12-E22.
10. Blumenthal D., Glaser J. Information technology comes to medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356:2527-2534.
11. Crosson J.C., Stroebel C., Scott J.G., Stello B., Crabtree B.F. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making and conflict. Ann. Fam. Med. 2005, 3(4):307-311.
12. Ventres W., Kooienga S., Vuckovic N., Marlin R., Nygren P., Stewart V. Physicians, patients and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann. Fam. Med. 2006, 4(2):124-131.
13. Crabtree B.F., Miller W.L., Stange K.C. Understanding practice from the ground up. J. Fam. Pract. 2001, 50(10):881-887.
14. Moore L., Savage J. Participant observation, informed consent and ethical approval. Nurse Res. 2002, 9(4):58-69.
15. George A., Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3(2):77-101.
17. Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.A. Naturalistic Inquiry 1985, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
18. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 1991, 45(3):214-222.
19. Osborne S. The New Public Governance? 2010, Routledge, Oxford.