Effects of two different levels of computerized decision support on blood glucose regulation in critically ill patients

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 53-60

  Eslami, Saeid ^a   de Keizer, Nicolette F ^a   Dongelmans, Dave A ^a   de Jonge, Evert ^b   Schultz, Marcus J ^a,c   Abu Hanna, Ameen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c HERMES Critical Care Group   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computerized decision support system; Evaluation; Glucose regulation; Safety statistical process control

Indexed keywords

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL; BLOOD GLUCOSE MEASUREMENTS; COMPUTERIZED DECISION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; DECISION SUPPORTS; EVALUATION; GLUCOSE CONTROL; GLUCOSE REGULATION; IN-PHASE; OPERATING MODES; PATIENT SPECIFIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SAMPLING FREQUENCIES; SAMPLING INTERVAL; SOCIOTECHNICAL; STATISTICAL CONTROL; TIME-TO-CAPTURE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BLOOD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE SENSORS; INSULIN; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL;

QUALITY CONTROL;

GLUCOSE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AGED; APACHE; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 83555176336     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Van den Berghe G., Wilmer A., Hermans G., Meersseman W., Wouters P.J., Milants I., Van Wijngaerden E., Bobbaers H., Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354:449-461.
2. van den Berghe G., Wouters P., Weekers F., Verwaest C., Bruyninckx F., Schetz M., Vlasselaers D., Ferdinande P., Lauwers P., Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345:1359-1367.
3. Garg R., Jarry A., Pendergrass M. Delay in blood glucose monitoring during an insulin infusion protocol is associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia in intensive care units. J. Hosp. Med. 2009, 4:E5-E7.
4. Juneja R., Roudebush C.P., Nasraway S.A., Golas A.A., Jacobi J., Carroll J., Nelson D., Abad V.J., Flanders S.J. Computerized intensive insulin dosing can mitigate hypoglycemia and achieve tight glycemic control when glucose measurement is performed frequently and on time. Crit. Care 2009, 13:R163.
5. Shortliffe E.H. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. JAMA 1987, 258:61-66.
6. Eslami S., Abu-Hanna A., de Jonge E., de Keizer N.F. Tight glycemic control and computerized decision-support systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 35:1505-1517.
7. Eslami S., Keizer N.F., Abu-Hanna A. The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients-a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007.
8. S. Eslami, A. Abu-Hanna, N.F. de Keizer, R.J. Bosman, P.E. Spronk, E. de Jonge, M.J. Schultz, Implementing glucose control in intensive care: a multicenter trial using statistical process control, Intensive Care Med., 36, 1556-1565.
9. Eslami S., de Keizer N.F., de Jonge E., Schultz M.J., Abu-Hanna A. A systematic review on quality indicators for tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients: need for an unambiguous indicator reference subset. Crit. Care 2008, 12:R139.
10. Benneyan J.C., Lloyd R.C., Plsek P.E. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2003, 12:458-464.
11. Mohammed M.A., Worthington P., Woodall W.H. Plotting basic control charts: tutorial notes for healthcare practitioners. Qual. Saf. Health Care 2008, 17:137-145.
12. Carey R.G. How do you know that your chart is improving? Part I: Basic concepts in statistical thinking. J. Ambul. Care Manage. 2002, 25:80-87.
13. Rood E., Bosman R.J., van der Spoel J.I., Taylor P., Zandstra D.F. Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005, 12:172-180.
14. Carey R.G. Improving Healthcare with Control Chart: Basic and Advanced SPC Methods and Case Studies 2003, ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee.
15. Wheeler D.J. Advanced Topics in Statistical Process Control 1995, SPC Press, Knoxville, TN.
16. Goud R., Hasman A., Strijbis A.M., Peek N. A parallel guideline development and formalization strategy to improve the quality of clinical practice guidelines. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2009, 78:513-520.
17. Berg M., Aarts J., van der Lei J. ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf. Med. 2003, 42:297-301.
18. Finfer S., Chittock D.R., Su S.Y., Blair D., Foster D., Dhingra V., Bellomo R., Cook D., Dodek P., Henderson W.R., Hebert P.C., Heritier S., Heyland D.K., McArthur C., McDonald E., Mitchell I., Myburgh J.A., Norton R., Potter J., Robinson B.G., Ronco J.J. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360:1283-1297.
19. Wiener R.S., Wiener D.C., Larson R.J. Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008, 300:933-944.
20. Griesdale D.E., de Souza R.J., van Dam R.M., Heyland D.K., Cook D.J., Malhotra A., Dhaliwal R., Henderson W.R., Chittock D.R., Finfer S., Talmor D. Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data. CMAJ 2009, 180:821-827.