Influence and critique of the EVAR 1 trial

Seminars in Vascular Surgery

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 146-148

  Starnes, Benjamin W ^a   Kwolek, Christopher J ^b,c   Parodi, Juan C ^d   Veith, Frank J ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFRARENAL AORTA ANEURYSM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROTOMY; LONG TERM CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 83455225667     PISSN: 08957967     EISSN: 15584518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2011.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Parodi J.C., Palmaz J.C., Barone H.D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991, 5:491-499.
2. Greenhalgh R.M., Brown L.C., Powell J.T., et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1863-1871.
3. De Bruin J.L., Baas A.F., Buth J., et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1881-1889.
4. Wyss T.R., Brown L.C., Powell J.T., et al. Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: data from the EVAR Trials. Ann Surg 2010, 252:805-812.
5. Tonnessen B.H., Sternbergh W.C., Money S.R. Mid- and long-term device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a comparison of AneuRx and Zenith endografts. J Vasc Surg 2005, 42:392-400.
6. Abbruzzese T.A., Kwolek C.J., Brewster D.C., et al. Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis. J Vasc Surg 2008, 48:19-28.
7. Kelso R.L., Lyden S.P., Butler B., et al. Late conversion of aortic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg 2009, 49:589-595.
8. Greenberg R.K., Chuter T.A., Cambria R.P., et al. Zenith abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular graft. J Vasc Surg 2008, 48:1-9.
9. Peterson B.G., Matsumura J.S., Brewster D.C., et al. Five-year report of a multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2007, 45:885-890.
10. Chaikof E.L., Blankensteijn J.D., Harris P.L., et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002, 35:1048-1060.
11. Schermerhorn M.L., O'Malley A.J., Jhaveri A., et al. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:464-474.
12. Lederle F.A., Freischlag J.A., Kyriakides T.C., et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009, 302:1535-1542.
13. Chaikof E.L. Caring for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: data, knowledge, and wisdom. J Vasc Surg 2009, 50(suppl):S1.
14. Chaer R.A., Gushchin A., Rhee R., et al. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009, 49:845-849.
15. Schmieder G.C., Stout C.L., Stokes G.K., et al. Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: duplex ultrasound imaging is better than computed tomography at determining the need for intervention. J Vasc Surg 2009, 50:1012-1017.