How demonstrations connect with referential intentions

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 190-200

  Roberts, Lawrence D ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8344289948     PISSN: 00048402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00048409712347791     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. K. Bach, Thought and Reference (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1987).
2. K. Bach, 'Paving the Road to Reference', Philosophical Studies 67 (1992) pp. 295-300.
3. K. Bach, 'Intentions and Demonstrations', Analysis 52 (1992) pp. 140-146.
4. K. Bach, 'Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and on Litman and Allen' in P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990) pp. 389-400.
5. K. Bach and R.M. Harnish, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979).
6. K. Bach and R.M. Harnish, 'How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle', Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1992) pp. 93-110.
7. J.S. Bruner, 'Afterword' in D.R. Olson (ed.), The Social Foundations of Language and Thought (New York: Norton, 1980) pp. 376-386.
8. K. Donnellan, 'Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again', The Philosophical Review 11 (1968) pp. 203-215.
9. D. Kaplan, 'Dthat' in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979) pp. 383-400.
10. D. Kaplan, 'Demonstratives' in J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (eds.),Themes from Kaplan (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989) pp. 481-563.
11. D. Kaplan, 'Afterthoughts' in [10, pp. 565-614].
12. G. Nunberg. 'Indexicality and Deixis', Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1993) pp. 1-43.
13. H. Putnam, 'The Meaning of "Meaning"' in his Philosophical Papers, vol. 2: Mind, Language, and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975) pp. 215-271.
14. M. Reimer, 'Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata', Philosophical Studies 63 (1991) pp. 187-202.
15. M. Reimer, 'Do Demonstrations Have Semantic Significance?', Analysis 51 (1991) pp. 177-183.
16. M. Reimer, 'Demonstrating with Descriptions', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992) pp. 877-893.
17. L.D. Roberts, 'The Figure-Ground Model for the Explanation of the Determination of Indexical Reference', Synthese 68 (1986) pp. 441-486.
18. L.D. Roberts, How Reference Works (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).
19. L.D. Roberts, "The Foundations of Kaplan's Direct Reference Theory', Philosophia 23 (1994) pp. 91-116.
20. L.D. Roberts, 'Are Lexical Meaning and Context Sufficient for Determining Indexical Reference?' Time, Space and Identity, Second International Colloquium on Deixis (Centre de Recherche en Informatique de Nancy: Nancy, France, 1996) pp. 201-213.
21. L.D. Roberts, 'A Development of Putnam's Indexical Account of Natural Kind Terms', in progress.
22. L.D. Roberts, 'Reimer on Demonstrating with Descriptions: Escaping the Russellian Paradigm', in progress.
23. M. Tomasello, 'Joint Attention as Social Cognition', Emory Cognition Project, report # 25 (Atlanta: Emory University, 1993) to appear in Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development (eds.) C. Moore and P. Dunham (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, forthcoming).
24. H.K. Wettstein, 'How To Bridge the Gap Between Meaning and Reference', Synthese 58 (1984) pp. 63-84.