On performance bounds for the integration of elastic and adaptive streaming flows

Performance Evaluation Review

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 235-245

  Bonald, Thomas ^a   Proutière, Alexandre ^a  

^a ORANGE LABS   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive streaming traffic; Elastic traffic; Flow level analysis; Insensitive bounds; Multi service network

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; INTERNET; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY OF SERVICE; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; TELECOMMUNICATION TRAFFIC;

ADAPTIVE STREAMING TRAFFIC; ELASTIC TRAFFIC; FLOW-LEVEL ANALYSIS; INSENSITIVE BOUNDS; MULTI-SERVICE NETWORKS;

PACKET NETWORKS;

EID: 8344286433     PISSN: 01635999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1012888.1005716     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. N. Argiriou, L. Georgiadis, Channel Sharing by Rate-Adaptive Streaming Applications, in: Proc. of IEEE Infocom, 2002.
2. D. Bansal, H. Balakrishnan, S. Floyd and S. Shenker, Dynamic Behaviour of Slowly-Responsive Congestion Control Algorithms, in: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, 2001.
3. S. Ben Predj, T. Bonald, A. Proutière, G. Régnié and J. Roberts, Statistical bandwidth sharing: A study of congestion at flow level, in: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, 2001.
4. T. Bonald and L. Massoulié, Impact of Fairness on Internet Performance, in: Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics, 2001.
5. T. Bonald and A. Proutière, Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks, Performance Evaluation 49 (2002) 193-209.
6. T. Bonald and A. Proutière, Insensitive bandwidth sharing in data networks, Queueing Systems 44 (2003) 69-100.
7. T. Bonald and A. Proutière, On stochastic bounds for monotonic processor sharing networks, to appear in Queueing Systems, 2004.
8. T. Bonald and J. Roberts, Congestion at flow level and the impact of user behaviour, Computer Networks 42 (2003) 521-536.
9. T. Bonald, J. Virtamo, Calculating flow level performance under balanced fairness, to appear in Performance Evaluation, 2004.
10. F. Delcoigne, A. Proutière and G. Régnié, Modeling integration of streaming and data traffic, Performance Evaluation 55 (2004) 185-209.
11. R. Doshi, P. Cao, Streaming Traffic Fairness Over Low Bandwidth WAN Links, in: Proc. of the third IEEE Workshop on Internet Applications, San Jose, 2003.
12. S. Floyd and K. Fall, Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 7 (1999) 458-472.
13. F. Guillemin, P. Robert and B. Zwart, Heavy tailed M/G/1-PS queues with impatience and admission control in packet networks, in: Proc. of IEEE Infocom, 2003.
14. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss and J. Wroclawski, Assured Forwarding PHB, IETF RFC 2597, 1999.
15. V. Jacobson, K. Nichols and K. Poduri, An Expedited Forwarding PHB, IETF RFC 2598, 1999.
16. F. Kelly, R. Williams, Fluid model for a network operating under a fair bandwidth-sharing policy, to appear in Annals of Applied Probability, 2003.
17. P. Key, L. Massoulié, A. Bain and F. Kelly, A network flow model for mixtures of file transfers and streaming traffic, in: Proc. of ITC 18, 2003.
18. A.A. Kherani and A. Kumar, Stochastic Models for Throughput Analysis of Randomly Arriving Elastic Flows in the Internet, in: Proc. of IEEE Infocom, 2002.
19. L. Massoulieé and J.W. Roberts, Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic, Telecommunication Systems 15 (2000) 185-201.
20. R. Núñez Queija, Sojourn times in a processor sharing queue with service interruptions, Queueing Systems 34 (1-4) (2000) 351-386.
21. R.F. Serfozo, Introduction to Stochastic Networks, Springer Verlag, 1999.
22. V. Timonen, Simulation studies on performance of balanced fairness, Research Report 6/2003, Helsinki University of Technology, Networking Laboratory, 2003.