An abstract monadic semantics for value recursion

RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 375-400

  Moggi, Eugenio ^a   Sabry, Amr ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ERROR ANALYSIS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY;

HASKEL METHODS; MONADIC SEMANTICS; VALUE RECURSION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 8344261649     PISSN: 09883754     EISSN: 28047346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1051/ita:2004018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. D. Ancona, Modular Formal Frameworks for Module Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. di Pisa (1998).
2. D. Ancona, S. Fagorzi, E. Moggi and E. Zucca, Mixin modules and computational effects, in Proc. 30th Int'l Coll. Automata, Languages, and Programming, Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2719 (2003).
3. D. Ancona and E. Zucca, A primitive calculus for module systems, in Proc. Int'l Conf. Principles & Practice Declarative Programming. Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1702 (1999) 62-79.
4. D. Ancona and E. Zucca, A calculus of module systems. J. Funct. Programming 12 (2002) 91-132. Extended version of [3].
5. Z.M. Ariola and M. Felleisen, The call-by-need lambda calculus. J. Funct. Programming 7 (1997) 265-301.
6. Z.M. Ariola, J. Maraist, M. Odersky, M. Felleisen and P. Wadler, A call-by-need lambda calculus in Conference record of POPL '95, 22nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, papers presented at the Symposium: San Francisco, California, January 22-25, 1995, New York, USA, ACM Press (1995) 233-246.
7. H.P. Barendregt, The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics, revised ed. North-Holland (1984).
8. A. Bawden, Letrec and callcc implement references. Message to comp.lang.scheme (1988).
9. N. Benton and M. Hyland, Traced pre-monoidal categories, in Fixed Points in Computer Science, July 20-21, 2002, edited by Z. Ésik and A. Ingólfsdóttir. BRICS Notes Series, NS-02-2 12-19.
10. G. Boudol, The recursive record semantics of objects revisited. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2028 (2001) 269-283.
11. G. Boudol, The recursive record semantics of objects revisited. J. Funct. Programming 14 (2004) 263-315.
12. G. Boudol and P. Zimmer, Recursion in the call-by-value λ-calculus. Fixed Points in Comput. Sci., BRICS Notes Series NS-02-2 (2002).
13. G. Bracha, The Programming Language Jigsaw: Mixins, Modularity, and Multiple Inheritance. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Utah (Mar. 1992).
14. M. Carlsson, Value recursion in the continuation monad. Unpublished Note (2003).
15. W. Cook, A Denotational Semantics of Inheritance. Ph.D. Thesis, Brown University (1989).
16. W. Cook and J. Palsberg, A denotational semantics of inheritance and its correctness, in Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages and Applications, ACM (1989).
17. G. Cousineau, P.L. Curien and M. Mauny, The categorical abstract machine, in Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture, edited by J.-P. Jouannaud, Springer Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 201 (Sept. 1985) 50-64.
18. D. Dreyer, R. Harper and K. Crary, A type system for well-founded recursion. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-03-163, Carnegie Mellon University (2003).
19. L. Erkök, Value Recursion in Monadic Computations. Ph.D. Thesis, OGI School of Science and Engineering, OHSU, Portland, Oregon (2002).
20. L. Erkök and J. Launchbury, Recursive monadic bindings, in Proc. of the ACM Sigplan International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP-00), New York, 18-21 Sept. ACM Sigplan Notices 35.9 (2000) 174-185.
21. L. Erkök, J. Launchbury and A. Moran, Semantics of value recursion for monadic input/output. J. Theor. Inform. Appl. 36 (2002) 155-180.
22. A. Filinski, Representing monads, in Conf. Record of 21st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL'94, Portland, OR, USA, 17-21 Jan., ACM Press, New York (1994) 446-457.
23. D.P. Friedman and A. Sabry, Recursion is a computational effect. Tech. Rep. 546, Computer Science Department, Indiana University (2000).
24. T. GHC Team, The glasgow haskell compiler user's guide, version 4.08. Available online from http://haskell.org/ghc/. Viewed on 12/28/2000.
25. T. Hirschowitz, Mixin Modules, Modules and Extended Value Binding in a Call-By-Value Setting. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Paris 7 (2003).
26. T. Hirschowitz and X. Leroy, Mixin modules in a call-by-value setting, in 11th European Symp. Programming, Springer-Verlag. Programming Languages & Systems 2305 (2002) 6-20.
27. T. Hirschowitz, X. Leroy and J.B. Wells, Compilation of extended recursion in call-by-value functional languages, in Proc. 5th Int'l Conf. Principles & Practice Declarative Programming (2003).
28. J. Hughes, Generalising monads to arrows. Sci. Comput. Program. 37 (2000) 67-111.
29. Report on the programming language Haskell 98 (Feb. 1999).
30. M.P. Jones and J.C. Peterson, Hugs 1.4 User Manual. Research Report YALEU/DCS/RR-1123. Yale University, Department of Computer Science (1997).
31. R. Kelsey, W. Clinger and J. Ree, Revised report on the algorithmic language Scheme. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 33 (1998) 26-76.
32. P.J. Landin, The mechanical evaluation of expressions. Comput. J. 6 (1964) 308-320.
33. J. Launchbury, J.R. Lewis and B. Cook, On embedding a microarchitectural design language within Haskell, in Proc. 1999 Int'l Conf. Functional Programming, ACM Press (1999) 60-69.
34. J. Maraist, M. Odersky and P. Wadler, The call-by-need lambda calculus. J. Funct. Programming 8 (1998) 275-317.
35. E. Moggi and S. Fagorzi, A monadic multi-stage metalanguage, in Proc. FoSSaCS '03, Springer-Verlag. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2620 (2003).
36. J.H. Morris, Lambda-Calculus Method of Programming Language. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (Dec. 1968).
37. R. Paterson, A new notation for arrows, in Proc. of the sixth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, ACM Press (2001) 229-240.
38. J. Power and E. Robinson, Premonoidal categories and notions of computation. Math. Struct. Comput. Sci. 7 (1997) 453-468.
39. O. Waddell, D. Sarkar and R.K. Dybvig, Robust and effective transformation of letrec, in Scheme Workshop (Oct. 2002).
40. A. Wright and M. Felleisen, A syntactic approach to type soundness. Inform. Comput. 115 (1994) 38-94.