Optimization of SMB systems with linear adsorption isotherms by the standing wave annealing technique

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 23, 2004, Pages 7588-7599

  Cauley, Fattaneh G ^a   Xie, Yi ^b,c   Wang, Nien Hwa Linda ^b  

^a PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; GLUCOSE; INSULIN; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEPARATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SULFURIC ACID;

LINEAR ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS; SMB SYSTEMS; STANDING WAVE ANNEALING TECHNIQUE (SWAT); STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; WAVE ANNEALING;

ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS;

GLUCOSE; INSULIN; SULFURIC ACID;

STANDING WAVE;

ADSORPTION; ALGORITHM; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ISOTHERM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS;

EID: 8344247797     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie049842n     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Broughton, D.; Gerhold, C. Continuous Sorption Process Employing Fixed Bed of sorbent and Moving Inlets and Outlets. U.S. Patent 2 985 589, 1961.
2. Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. L. Standing Waving Analysis of SMB Chromatography: Linear Systems. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 2488.
3. Mazzotti, M.; Storti, G.; Morbidelli, M. Optimal Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Units for Nonlinear Chromatographic Separations. J. Chromatogr. A 1997a, 769, 3-24.
4. Storti, G.; Baciocchi, R.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Design of Optimal Operating Conditions of Simulated Moving Bed Adsorptive Separation Units. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 288-301.
5. Xie, Y.; Farrenburg, C. A.; Chim, Y. C.; Mun, S.-Y.; Wang, N.-H. L. Design of SMB for A Nonlinear Amino Acid System with Mass-transfer Effects. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 2850.
6. Wu, D.-J.; Xie, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. L. Design of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography for Amino Acid Separations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 4023.
7. Wu, D. J.; Ma, Z.; Wang, N. H. L. Optimization of Throughput and Desorbent Consumption in Simulated Moving-Bed Chromatograph for Paclitaxel Purification. J. Chromatogr. A 1939, 855, 71-89.
8. Xie, Y.; Wu, D.-J.; Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. L. Extended Standing Wave Design Method for Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography: Linear Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1993.
9. Hritzko, B.; Xie, Y.; Wooley, R.; Wang, N.-H. L. Standing-Wave Design of Tandem SMB for Linear Multicomponent Systems. AIChE J. 2002, 48, 2769.
10. Mallmann, T.; Burris, B. D.; Ma, Z.; Wang, N.-H. L. Standing Wave Design of Nonlinear SMB Systems for Fructose Purification. AIChE J. 1998, 44, 2628.
11. Biressi, G.; Ludemann-Hombourger, O.; Mazzotti, M.; Nicoud, R.-M.; Morbidelli, M. Design and Optimization of a Simulated Moving Bed Unit: Role of Deviations from Equilibrium Theory. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 876, 3-15.
12. Jupke, A.; Epping, A.; Schmidt-Traub, H. Optimal Design of Batch and Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Separation Process. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 944, 93.
13. Dunnebier, G.; Fricke, J.; Klatt, K. U. Optimal Design and Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Reactions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 2290-2304.
14. Azevedo, D. C. S.; Rodrigues, A. E. Design of a Simulated Moving Bed in the Presence of Mass-transfer Resistances. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 956.
15. Pynnonen, B. Simulated Moving Bed Processing: Escape from the High-Cost Box. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 827, 143.
16. Zhang, Z. Y.; Hidajat, K.; Ray, A. K.; Morhidelli, M. Multi-objective Optimization of SMB and Varicol Processes for Chiral separation. AIChE J. 2002, 48, 2800.
17. Mun, S.-Y.; Xie, Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Wang, N.-H. L. Optimal Design of a Size-Exclusion Tandem Simulated Moving Bed for Insulin Purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 1977.
18. Xie, Y.; Mun, S.-Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Wang, N.-H. L. Standing Wave Design and Experimental Validation of a Tandem Simulated Moving Bed Process for Insulin Purification. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18, 1332.
19. Ergun, S. Fluid Flow through Packed Column. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1952, 48, 89.
20. Biegler, L. T.; Grossmann, I. E. Retrospective on optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 1169.
21. Luenberger, D. G. Linear and Nonlinear Programming, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, 2003.
22. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications of Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, 1975.
23. Deb, K. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2002.
24. Fonseca, C. M.; Fleming, P. J. Multi-objective Optimization and Multiple Constraints Handling with Evolutionary Algorithms I: A Unified Formulation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cy. A 1998, 28, 26-37.
25. Salamon, P.; Sibani; J. P.; Frost, R. Facts, Conjectures, and Improvements for Simulated Annealing; Siam, Philadelphia, 2002.
26. Dolan, W. B.; Cummings, P. T.; LE Van, M. D. Heat Exchanger Network Design by Simulated Annealing. Peklaitis, G. V., Spriggs, H. D., Eds.; Foundations of computer Aided Process Operations; Elsevier: New York, 1987.
27. Dolan, W. B.; Cummings, P. T.; LE Van, M. D. Process Optimization via Simulated Annealing: Application to Network Design. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 5, 725.
28. Dolan, W. B.; Cummings, P. T.; LE Van, M. D. Algorithmic Efficiency of Simulated Annealing for heat Exchanger Network design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1990, 14, 1039.
29. Cardoso, M. F.; Salcedo, R. L.; de Azevedo, S. F.; Barbosa, D. Optimization of reactive distillation processes with simulated annealing. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 5059.
30. Yarovsky, I.; Hearn, T. W.; Aguilar, M. I. Molecular Simulation of Peptide interactions with an RP-HPLC Sorbent. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10962.
31. Datta, B.; Jayaraman, V. K.; Kulkarni, B. D. A comparative study of annealing methods for batch scheduling problems. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2001, 79, 73.
32. Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukosky, S. A. Numerical Recipes; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986.
33. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D., Jr.; Vecchi, M. P. Optimization By Simulated Annealing. Science 1983, 220, 671-680.
34. Cerny, V. Thermodynamical Approach To The Traveling Salesman Problem: An Efficient Simulation Algorithm. J. Opt. The. Apps. 1985, 45, 41-55.
35. Franz, A.; Hoffmann, K. H. Optimal Annealing Schedules For A Modified Tsallis Statistics. J. Compl. Phys. 2002, 176, 196-204.
36. Franz, A.; Hoffmann, K. H.; Salamon, P. Best Possible Strategy For Finding Ground States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 5219-5222.
37. Salamon, P.; Nulton, J. D.; Robinson, J.; Pedersen, J. M.; Ruppeiner, G.; Liao, L. Simulated Annealing With Constant Thermodynamic Speed. Comput. Phys. Comm. 1988, 49, 423-428.
38. Schon, J. C, Preferential Trapping On Energy Landscapes In Regions Containing Deep-Lying Minima: The Reason For The Success Of Simulated Annealing? J. Phys. A 1997, 30, pp 2367-2389.
39. Zbigniew, M.; Fogel, D. B. How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2000.
40. Jacobsen, B. H.; Mosegaard, K.; Sabani, P. Inverse Methods, Interdisciplinary Elements of Methodology, Computation, and Applications; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1996.
41. Wales, D. J.; Scheraga, H. A. Chemistry: Global Optimization of Clusters, Crystals And Biomolecules. Science 1999, 285, 1368-1372.
42. Metropolis, N.; Rosenbluth, A. W.; Rosenbluth, M. N.; Teller, A. H.; Teller, E. Equation of State Calculations By Fast Computing Machines. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 1087-1092.
43. Nourani, Y.; Andresen, B. A Comparison of Simulated Annealing Cooling Strategies. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 1998, 31, 8373.
44. Wagner, H. M. Principles Of Operations Research; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1975.
45. Binmore, K. Fun And Games; D. C. Heath: Lexington, 1992.