Things still to be done on the still-face effect

Infancy

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 475-482

  Tronick, E Z ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; EMOTIONALITY; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; SOCIAL EVOLUTION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 8344230885     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327078IN0404_02     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Adamson, L. B., & Frick, J. E. (2003). The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy, 4, 451-173.
2. Bohne, L. (2002). Adult still-face procedure. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis.
3. Brazelton, T. B. (1992). Touchpoints: Your child's emotional and behavioral development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Brazelton, T. B., & Tronick, E. (1980). Preverbal communication between mothers and infants. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 299-315). New York: Norton.
5. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Carter, A. S., Mayes, L. C., & Pajer, K. A. (1990). The role of dyadic affect in play and infant sex in predicting infant response to the still-face situation. Child Development, 61, 764-773.
7. Cohn, J. F., & Elmore, M. (1988). Effect of contingent changes in mothers' affective expression on the organization of behavior in 3-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 493-505.
8. Cohn, J. F., & Tronick, E. Z. (1983). Three-month-old infants' reaction to simulated maternal depression. Child Development, 54, 185-193.
9. Gianino, A., & Tronick, E. Z. (1988). The mutual regulation model: The infant's self and interactive regulation, coping, and defensive capacities. In T. Field, P. McCabe, & N. Schneiderman (Eds.), Stress and coping (pp. 47-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Hofer, M. A. (1984). Relationships as regulators: A psychobiologic perspective on bereavement. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 183-197.
11. Muir, D., & Lee, K. (2003). The still-face effect: Methodological issues and new applications. Infancy, 4, 483-491.
12. Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. In T. Field & N. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 177-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Rochat, P., Neisser, U., & Marian, V. (1998). Are young infants sensitive to interpersonal contingency? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 355-366.
14. Spitz, R. (1965). The first year of life. New York: International Universities Press.
15. Stack, D. M., & Muir, D. W. (1992). Adult tactile stimulation during face-to-face interactions modulates five-month-olds' affect and attention. Child Development, 63, 1509-1525.
16. Stechler, G., & Carpenter, G. (1967). A viewpoint on early affective development. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Exceptional infant: Vol. I. The normal infant (pp. 165-189). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
17. Stoller, S., & Field, T. (1982). Alteration of mother and infant behavior and heart rate during a still-face perturbation of face-to-face interaction. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and early interaction (pp. 57-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Toda, S., & Fogel, A. (1993). Infant response to the still-face situation at 3 and 6 months. Developmental Psychology, 29, 532-538.
19. Tronick, E. (1980). The primacy of social skills in infancy. In D. B. Sawin, R. C. Hawkins, L. O. Walker, & J. H. Penticuff (Eds.), Exceptional infant: Vol. 4. Psychosocial risks in infant-environment transactions (pp. 144-158). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
20. Tronick, E. Z. (2003). "Of course all relationships are unique": How co-creative processes generate unique mother-infant and patient-therapist relationships and change other relationships. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 473-491.
21. Tronick, E., Als, H., & Adamson, L. (1979). The communicative structure of face-to-face interaction. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication (pp. 349-372). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 17, 1-13.
23. Tronick, E., Als, H., & Brazelton, T. B. (1980). The infant's communicative competencies and the achievement of intersubjectivity. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 261-274). New York: Mouton.
24. Tronick, E. Z., Brushweiller-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Naham, J. P., et al. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 290-299.
25. Tronick, E. Z., & Harrison, A. (2002, October). A clinical approach to a traumatized child guided by the dyadic expansion of consciousness hypothesis. Paper presented at the Irreducible Needs of Children Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
26. Tronick, E. Z., Weinberg, M. K., & Olson, K. L. (2002, April). Stability of infant coping with the still-face. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
27. Weinberg, M. K., Beeghly, M., Olson, K. L., & Tronick, E. Z. (2002, April). Preschoolers reactions to their still-faced mother. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
28. Weinberg, M. K., & Tronick, E. Z. (1996). Infant affective reactions to the resumption of maternal interaction after the still-face. Child Development, 67, 905-914.
29. Weinberg, M. K., Tronick, E. Z., Cohn, J. F., & Olson, K. L. (1999). Gender differences in emotional expressivity and self-regulation during early infancy. Developmental Psychology, 35, 175-188.