Interrogative suggestibility: Cross-cultural stability of psychometric and correlational properties of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 177-186

  Polczyk, Romuald ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Absorption; Anxiety; Big Five; Cross cultural differences; Dissociation; Imagery ability; Interrogative suggestibility; Social desirability

Indexed keywords

EID: 8344226830     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bernstein E.M. Putnam F.W. Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 174 1986 727-735
2. Carlson E.B. Putnam M.D. An update on the dissociative experiences scale Dissociation 6 1993 16-27
3. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEP-FFI). Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Inventories
4. Crowne D.P. Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology Journal of Consulting Psychology 24 1960 349-354
5. Dobson M. Markham R. Imagery ability and source monitoring: Implications for eyewitness memory British Journal of Psychology 32 1993 111-118
6. Eisen M.L. Carlson E.B. Individual differences in suggestibility: examining the influence of dissociation, absorption, and a history of childhood abuse Applied Cognitive Psychology 12 1998 S47-S61
7. Garry M. Manning Ch.G. Loftus E. Sherman S.J. Imagination inflation: imagining a childhood even inflates confidence that it occurred Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 1996 208-214
8. Gheorghiu, V. A. (unpublished material). Vividness of imagery test
9. Gudjonsson G.H. A new scale of interrogative suggestibility Personality and Individual Differences 5 1984 303-314
10. Gudjonsson G.H. A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale British Journal of Clinical Psychology 26 1987 215-221
11. Gudjonsson G.H. Interrogative suggestibility: Its relationship with assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, state anxiety and method of coping British Journal of Clinical Psychology 27 1988 159-166
12. Gudjonsson G.H. Theoretical and empirical aspects of interrogative suggestibility. In: Gheorghiu V.A. Netter P. Eysenck H.J. Rosenthal R. (Eds.). Suggestion and suggestibility. Theory and research 1989 135-143 Springer Verlag Berlin
13. Gudjonsson G.H. The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony 1992 John Wiley and Sons New York
14. Gudjonsson G.H. The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Manual 1997 Psychology Press Hove, UK
15. Gudjonsson G.H. Clark N. Suggestibility in police interrogation: a social psychological model Social Behaviour 1 1986 83-104
16. Gudjonsson G.H. Lister S. Interrogative suggestibility and its relationship with perceptions of self-concept and control Journal of the Forensic Science Society 24 1984 99-110
17. Gudjonsson G.H. Rutter S.C. Clare I.C. The relationship between suggestibility and anxiety among suspects detained at police stations Psychological Medicine 25 1995 875-878
18. Hansdottir I.T. Thorsteinsson H.S. Kristinsdottir H. Ragnarsson R.S. The effects of instructions and anxiety on interrogative suggestibility Personality and Individual Differences 11 1990 85-87
19. Heaps Ch. Nash M. Individual differences in imagination inflation Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6 1999 313-318
20. Leary M.R. A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9 1983 371-375
21. Liebman J.I. McKinley-Pace M.J. Leonard A.M. Sheesley L.A. Gallant C.L. Renkey M.E. Lehman E.B. Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of adults' eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility Personality and Individual Differences 33 2002 49-66
22. Merckelbach H. Muris P. Rassin E. Horselenberg R. Dissociative experiences and interrogative suggestibility in college students Personality and Individual Differences 29 2000 1133-1140
23. Merckelbach H. Muris P. Wessel I. van Koppen P.J. The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS): Further data on its reliability, validity, and metacognition correlates Social Behavior and Personality 26 1998 203-210
24. Ost J. Fellows B. Bull R. Individual differences and the suggestibility of human memory Contemporary Hypnosis 14 1997 132-137
25. Polczyk, R. (2000). Wpływ społecznya różnice indywidulne: Skale Sugestybilności Interrogatywnej Gudjonssona [Social influence and individual differences: Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales]. Kolokwia Psychologiczne nr 8: Wpływspołeczny:BAdania i praktyka. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii PAN
26. Raven J.C. Court J.H. Raven J. Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales (Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices) 1983 H.K. Lewis London
27. Rotter J.B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement Psychological Monographs 80 1966
28. Smith P. Gudjonsson G.H. Confabulation among forensic inpatients and its relationship with memory, suggestibility, compliance, anxiety, and self-esteem Personality and Individual Differences 19 1995 517-523
29. Tellegen A. Atkinson G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("Absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility Journal of Abnormal Psychology 83 1974 268-277
30. Watson D. Friend R. Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 33 1969 448-457
31. Wilson S.C. Barber T.X. The inventory of childhood memories and imaginings 1983 Cushing Hospital Framingham, MA
32. Wolfradt, U. (2003, July). Personality and suggestibility. Theoretical assumptions and empirical findings. Paper presented at the Fourth international symposium on suggestion and suggestibility, Kraków, Poland
33. Wolfradt U. Meyer T. Interrogative suggestibility, anxiety and dissociation among anxious patients and normal controls Personality and Individual Differences 25 1998 425-432
34. Wright D.B. Loftus E.F. Measuring dissociation: Comparison of alternative forms of the dissociative experiences scale American Journal of Psychology 112 1999 497-519