Nonstationary multistate Coulomb and multistate exponential models for nonadiabatic transitions

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2003, Pages

  Ostrovsky, V N ^a  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM THEORY;

LANDAU-ZENER-TYPE TRANSITIONS; MULTISTATE COULOMB; MULTISTATE EXPONENTIAL MODELS; NONADIABATIC TRANSITIONS; SCHRODINGER EQUATION;

ELECTRON TRANSITIONS;

EID: 8344224811     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Yu.N. Demkov and V.I. Osherov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1589 (1967) [Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 916 (1968)].
2. V.I. Osherov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 1157 (1965).
3. Yu.N. Demkov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 166, 1076 (1966).
4. Yu.N. Demkov, Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. Fiz. Khim. 4, 7 (1966).
5. V.I. Osherov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 10, 30 (1968).
6. Recently Demkov-Osherov model was reassessed by J.H. Macek and M.J. Cavagneor, Phys. Rev. A 58, 348 (1994)
7. V.A. Yurovsky and A. Ben-Reuven, J. Phys. B 31, 1 (1998) scrutinized the case of level degeneracy in stationary Demkov-Osherov model.
8. L.D. Landau, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 2, 46 (1932).
9. C. Zener, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 137, 696 (1932).
10. E. Majorana, Nuovo Cimento 9, 43 (1932).
11. For recent advances in the analysis of the stationary Landau-Zener model, see papers by Nakamura and Zhu: C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Math. Phys. 33, 2697 (1992)
12. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1892 (1992)
13. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 8497 (1992)
14. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 6208 (1993)
15. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4855 (1994)
16. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 7448 (1995)
17. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 4689 (1998)
18. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10630 (1994)
19. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 7501 (1998)
20. C. Zhu and H. Nakamura, Adv. Chem. Phys. 117, 127 (2001)
21. H. Nakamura and C. Zhu, Comments At. Mol. Phys. 32, 249 (1996)
22. H. Nakamura, in Dynamics of Molecules and Chemical Reactions, edited by R.E. Wyatt and J.Z.H. Zhang (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996), Chap. 12.
23. V.N. Ostrovsky and H. Nakamura, J. Phys. A 30, 6939 (1997).
24. Yu.N. Demkov and V.N. Ostrovsky, Phys. Rev. A 61, 32705 (2000).
25. Yu.N. Demkov and V.N. Ostrovsky, J. Phys. B 34, 2419 (2001).
26. V.I. Osherov and V.G. Ushakov, Phys. Rev. A 53, 3157 (1996).
27. R.S. Tantawi, A.S. Sabbah, J.H. Macek, and S.Yu. Ovchinnikov, Phys. Rev. A 62, 042710 (2000).
28. I.M. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York 1980).
29. M.S. Child, Mol. Phys. 24, 171 (1971).
30. A.D. Bandrauk, Mol. Phys. 24, 661 (1972).
31. Similar difficulties were encountered in the stationary model considered by D.S.F. Crothers, B.S. Nesbitt, and S.F.C. O'Rourke, J. Phys. B 34, 1967 (2001)
32. the related issue of penetrability of the one-dimensional Coulomb potential received some attention in the literature: M. Moshinsky, J. Phys. A 26, 2445 (1993)
33. M. Moshinsky, J. Phys. A 27, 4719 (1994)
34. R.G. Newton, ibid. 27, 4717 (1994)
35. P.B. Kurasov, ibid. 29, 1767 (1996)
36. M. Moshinsky, J. Phys. A 30, 5583 (1997)
37. W. Fischer, H. Leschke, and P. Müller, ibid. 30, 5579 (1997).
38. E.E. Nikitin, Adv. Chem. Phys. 5, 135 (1970)
39. E.E. Nikitin and S.Ya. Umanskii, Theory of Slow Atomic Collisions (Springer, Berlin, 1984).