A comparison among several P300 brain-computer interface speller paradigms

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 209-213

  Fazel Rezai, Reza ^a   Gavett, Scott ^a   Ahmad, Waqas ^a   Rabbi, Ahmed ^a   Schneider, Eric ^a  

^a University of North Dakota   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface; Electroencephalography; P300 based speller; Paradigm design

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPELLING;

EID: 83355169784     PISSN: 15500594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155005941104200404     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wolpaw J, Mcfarland D, Neat G, Forneris C. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 78: 252-259.
2. Farwell L, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 70: 510-523.
3. Wolpaw J, Birbaumer N, Heetderks W, Mcfarland D, Peckham P, Schalk G, et al. Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 2000; 8: 164-173. (Pubitemid 30437005)
4. Salvaris M, Sepulveda F. Visual modifications on the P300 speller BCI paradigm. J Neural Eng 2009, 6: 046011.
5. Allison B, Pineda J. ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehab Engineer 2003; 11: 111.
6. Sellers E, Krusienski D, Mcfarland D, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J. A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol Psychology 2006; 73: 242-252. (Pubitemid 46053656)
7. Guger C, Daban S, Sellers E, Holzner C, Krausz G, Carabalona R, Gramatica F, Edlinger G. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci Lett 2009; 462: 94-98.
8. Fazel-Rezai R. Human error in P300 speller paradigm for brain-computer interface. In: the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France 2007, 2516-2519.
9. Townsend G, Lapallo B, Boulay C, Krusienski D, Frye G, Hauser C, Schwartz N, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J, Sellers E. A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1109-1120.
10. Treder M, Blankertz B. (C) overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain computer interface. Behav Brain Functions 2010; 6: 28.
11. Brouwer A, Van Erp J. A tactile P300 brain-computer interface. Frontiers Neurosci 2010; 4: 19.
12. Nijboer F, Furdea A, Gunst I, Mellinger J, Mcfarland D, Birbaumer N, Kübler A. An auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). J Neurosci Methods 2008; 167: 43-50. (Pubitemid 350186060)
13. Fazel-Rezai R, Abhari K. A region-based P300 speller for brain-computer interface. Canad J Elect Comput Eng 2009; 34: 81-85.
14. Polich J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 63: 251-259. (Pubitemid 16035611)
15. Polich J. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol/EP Section 1987, 68: 311-320.
16. Duncan-Johnson C, Donchin E. The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biol Psychology 1982; 14: 1-52. (Pubitemid 12080791)
17. Zim H. Codes and secret wnting. New York: Morrow; 1948.