Cancer survivorship: The impact on primary care

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 61, Issue 592, 2011, Pages

  Watson, Eila K ^a   Rose, Peter W ^b   Loftus, Rosie ^c   Devane, Ciaran ^c  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c MACMILLAN CANCER SUPPORT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOSERELIN; TAMOXIFEN;

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CANCER SURVIVOR; CANCER THERAPY; COMORBIDITY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT;

FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HOLISTIC HEALTH; HUMANS; LONG-TERM CARE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVORS;

EID: 83355163454     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X606771     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Maddams J, Brewster D, Gavin A, et al. Cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom: estimates for 2008. Br J Cancer 2009; 101(3): 541-547.
2. Lewis RA, Neal RD, Hendry M, et al. Patients'and health care professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 59(564): 533-540.
3. Frew G, Smith A, Zutshi B, et al. Results of a quantitative survey to explore both perceptions of the purposes of follow-up and preferences formethods of follow-up delivery among service users, primary care practitioners and specialist clinicians after cancer treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010; 22(10): 874-884.
4. Corner J. Addressing the needs of cancer survivors: issues and challenges. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2008; 8(5): 443-451.
5. Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (1): CD002200.
6. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2002; 324(7341): 813.
7. Renehan AG, O'Dwyer ST, Whynes DK. Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer. BMJ 2004; 328(7431): 81.
8. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, et al. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (4): CD001768.
9. O'Brien R, Rose PW, Campbell C, et al. Experiences of follow-up after treatment in patients with prostate cancer: a qualitative study. BJU Int 2010; 106(7): 998-1003.
10. Adams E, Boulton M, Rose P, et al. Views of cancer care reviews in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2011; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567108.
11. Khan NF, Watson E, Rose PW. Primary care consultation behaviours of long-term, adult survivors of cancer in the UK. Br J Gen Pract 2011; DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X561195.
12. NHS Improvement. Effective follow up: testing risk stratified pathways. Leicester: NHS Improvement, 2011. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ RiskStratifiedPathways-May-2011.pdf (accessed 22 Sep 2011).
13. Khan NF, Mant D, Rose PW. Quality of care for chronic diseases in a British cohort of long-term cancer survivors. Ann Fam Med 2010; 8(5): 418-424.
14. Khan NF, Carpenter L, Watson E, Rose PW. Cancer screening and preventative care among long-term cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 2010; 102(7): 1085-1090.
15. Torjesen I. Forward planning. HSJ: Cancer survivorship. HSJ Supplement 14 April 2011; 1-14. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/HSJ-survivorship- supplement.pdf (accessed 22 Sep 2011).
16. Gilbert SM, Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, et al. Cancer survivorship: challenges and changing paradigms. J Urol 2008; 179(2): 431-438.
17. National Cancer Survivorship Initiative. Test communities. London: MacMillan Cancer Support, 2011. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/test-communities (accessed 22 Sep 2011).
18. National Cancer Survivorship Initiative. Treatment summary. London: MacMillan Cancer Support, 2011. http://www.ncsi.org.uk/what-we-are-doing/ assessment-care-planning/treatment-summary/ (accessed 22 Sep 2011).