Performance of different configurations of hybrid growth membrane bioreactor (HG-MBR) for treatment of mixed wastewater

Desalination

Volumn 284, Issue , 2012, Pages 261-268

  Yang, Fei ^a   Wang, Ying ^a   Bick, Amos ^b,c   Gilron, Jack ^a   Brenner, Asher ^a   Gillerman, Leonid ^a   Herzberg, Moshe ^a   Oron, Gideon ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c SHENKAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND DESIGN   (Israel)

Author keywords

Biofilm carriers; Biomass fraction; Fouling; Hybrid growth membrane bioreactor (HG MBR); Pollutants removal

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOFILM CARRIERS; BIOFILM PROCESS; BIOMASS FRACTION; CHICKEN MANURE; DESERT CONDITIONS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; DOMESTIC WASTEWATER; DRAFT TUBES; FIXED-BED; HOLLOW FIBER; HYBRID GROWTH MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR (HG-MBR); MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; POLLUTANTS REMOVAL; RECIRCULATIONS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; UF MEMBRANES;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOFILMS; ECOLOGY; FOULING; HYDRAULIC TURBINES; MANURES; TUBES (COMPONENTS); WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTORS;

BIOFILM; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; GROWTH RESPONSE; HYBRID; MANURE; MEMBRANE; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER;

EID: 83255194005     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bick A., Oron G., Gillerman L., Manor Y. Data envelopment analysis for assessing optimal operation of ultra-filtration systems for effluent polishing. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2003, 3:379-384.
2. Oron G., Bick A., Gillerman L., Manor Y. Hybrid membrane systems for secondary effluent polishing for unrestricted reuse for agricultural irrigation. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50:305-312.
3. Wintgens T., Melin T., Schafer A., Khan S., Muston M., Bixio D., Thoeye C. The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse. Desalination 2005, 178(1-3):1-11.
4. Shannon M.A., Bohn P.W., Elimelech M., Georgiadis J.G., Mariñas B.J., Mayes A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452:301-310.
5. Lesjean B., Leiknes T. AMEDEUS and EUROMBRA projects: boosting the development of MBR technologies in Europe. Desalination 2006, 200:710-711.
6. Koros W.J., Ma Y.H., Shimidzu T. Terminology for membranes and membrane processes. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68:1479-1489.
7. Chang I.S., Clech P.L., Jefferson P.B., Judd S. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 11:1018-1029.
8. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284(1-2):17-53.
9. Yang F., Bick A., Shandalov S., Brenner A., Oron G. Yield stress and rheological characteristics of activated sludge in an airlift membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 334:83-90.
10. Nicolella C., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. J. Biotechnol. 2000, 80:1-33.
11. Lee W.-N., Kang I.-J., Lee C.-H. Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane coupled moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Res. 2006, 40:1827-1835.
12. Leiknes T., Ødegaard H. The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2007, 202:135-143.
13. Canziani R., Emondi V., Garavaglia M., Malpei F., Pasinetti E., Buttiglieri G. Effect of oxygen concentration on biological nitrification and microbial kinetics in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) treating old landfill leachate. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:202-212.
14. Melin E., Leiknes T., Helness H., Rasmussen V., Ødegaard H. Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51:421-430.
15. Sombatsompop K., Visvanathan C., Ben Aim R. Evaluation of biofouling phenomenon in suspended and attached growth membrane bioreactor systems. Desalination 2006, 201(1-3):138-149.
16. Nogueira R., Melo L.F., Purkhold U., Wuertz S., Wagner M. Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Res. 2002, 36(2):469-481.
17. Metcalf I., Eddy, Tchobanoglous G., Burton F.L., Stencel H.D. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse 2003, 1408. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New York, New York, (ISBN 0-07-112250-8). 4th ed.
18. Herzberg M., Dosoretz C.G., Green M. Increased biofilm activity in BGAC reactors. AICHE J. 2005, 51:1042-1047.
19. Yang Q., Chen J., Zhang F. Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers. Desalination 2006, 189:292-302.
20. Ivanovic I., Leiknes T. Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination 2008, 231:182-190.
21. Sofia A., Ng W.J., Ong S.L. Engineering design approaches for minimum fouling in submerged MBR. Desalination 2004, 160:67-74.
22. Yang F., Bick A., Shandalov S., Oron G. Optimal performance of an immersed membrane bioreactor equipped with a draft tube for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54:155-162.
23. APHA Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 2005, 1368. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C. 21th ed.
24. Ferree M.A., Shannon R.D. Evaluation of a second derivative UV/visible spectroscopy technique for nitrate and total nitrogen analysis of wastewater samples. Water Res. 2001, 35:327-332.
25. Chang I.S., Lee C.H. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system - the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 1998, 120(3):221-233.
26. Rosenberger S., Kraume M. Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002, 146(1-3):373-379.
27. Judd S.E. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment 2006, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
28. Lee J.M., Ahn W.-Y., Lee C.H. Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2001, 35:2435-2445.
29. Lee W., Jeon J.-H., Cho Y., Chung K.Y., Min B.-R. Behavior of TMP according to membrane pore size. Proceedings of International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes (ICOM), 25-28 August 2005, Seoul, Korea 2005, Published by the Department of Chemical Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
30. Principal manifolds for data visualisation and dimension reduction. LNCSE 58 2007, Springer. A. Gorban, B. Kegl, D. Wunsch, A. Zinovyev (Eds.).
31. Everitt B.S., Landau S., Leese M. Cluster Analysis 2001, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York. 4th Edition.
32. Huang X., Wei C.H., Yu K.C. Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309:7-16.