Accuracy of blind versus ultrasound-guided suprapatellar bursal injection

Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 20-25

  Bum Park, Yong ^a   Ah Choi, Won ^b   Kim, Yong Kyun ^c   Chul Lee, Sang ^c   Hae Lee, Ji ^a  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seonam University of Medicine Myongji Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Injection; Knee; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

HYALURONIC ACID; VISCOSUPPLEMENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAARTICULAR DRUG ADMINISTRATION; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SYNOVIAL BURSA; VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION;

AGED; BURSA, SYNOVIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VISCOSUPPLEMENTATION; VISCOSUPPLEMENTS;

EID: 83255193967     PISSN: 00912751     EISSN: 10970096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20890     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 1905.
2. Balazs EA, Denlinger JL. Viscosupplementation: a new concept in the treatment of osteoarthritis. JRheumatol Suppl 1993; 39: 3.
3. Lussier A, Cividino AA, McFarlane CA, et al. Viscosupplementation with hylan for the treatment of osteoarthritis: findings from clinical practice in Canada. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 1579.
4. Jackson DW, Evans NA, Thomas BM. Accuracy of needle placement into the intra-articular space of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1522.
5. Luc M, Pham T, Chagnaud C, et al. Placement of intraarticular injection verified by the backflow technique. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 714.
6. Bliddal H. Placement of intra-articular injections verified by mini-air arthrography. Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58: 641.
7. Jones A, Regan M, Ledingham J, et al. Importance of placement of intra-articular steroid injections. BMJ 1993; 307: 1329.
8. Waddell D, Estey D, Bricker DC, et al. Viscosupplementation under fluoroscopic control. Am J Med Sports 2001; 3: 237.
9. Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Terslev L, et al. Guidance by ultrasound of intra-articular injections in the knee and hip joints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9: 512.
10. Ceulemans RY, van Holsbeeck MT. Sonography of the knee. In: Van Holsbeeck MT, Introcaso JH, editors. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2001, p 587.
11. Zuber TJ. Knee joint aspiration and injection. Am Fam Physician 2002; 66: 1497.
12. Wind WM, Smolinski RJ. Reliability of common knee injection sites with low-volume injections. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 858.
13. Sambrook PN, Champion GD, Browne CD, et al. Corticosteroid injection for osteoarthritis of the knee: peripatellar compared to intra-articular route. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1989; 7: 609.
14. Bianchi S, Zamorani MP. US-guided interventional procedures. In: Bianchi S, Martinoli C, editors. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007, p 891.
15. Im SH, Lee SC, Park YB, et al. Feasibility of sonography for intra-articular injections in the knee through a medial patellar portal. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1465.