Quantitative descriptive analysis of Italian polenta produced with different corn cultivars

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 412-417

  Zeppa, Giuseppe ^a   Bertolino, Marta ^a   Rolle, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Corn; Polenta; Principal component analysis; Quantitative descriptive analysis; Sensory analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONSUMER; COOKING; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; HUMAN; ITALY; MAIZE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SENSATION;

ADULT; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COOKING; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; SENSATION; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 83255187313     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4593     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Crops Production (2009). [Online].). Available: [20 April 2011].
2. Pellati R, Cibi e bevande dalla 'A' alla 'Z'. Mondadori, Milan (1997).
3. McGee H, On Food and Cooking. Scribner, New York (2004).
4. Bejosano FP, Joseph S, Miranda Lopez R, Kelekci NN and Waniska RD, Rheological and sensory evaluation of wheat flour tortillas during storage. Cereal Chem 82: 256-263 (2005).
5. Park DK and Maga JA, Identification of key volatiles responsible for odor quality differences in popped popcorn of selected hybrids. Food Chem 99: 538-545 (2006).
6. de Oliveira GPR and Rodriguez-Amaya DB, Processed and prepared corn products as sources of lutein and zeaxanthin: compositional variation in the food chain. J Food Sci 72: S79-S85 (2007).
7. Anton AA, Improving the nutritional and textural properties of wheat flour tortillas. Cereal Res Commun 36: 301-311 (2008).
8. Alviola JN and Awika JM, Relationship between objective and subjective wheat flour tortilla quality evaluation methods. Cereal Chem 87: 481-485 (2010).
9. Barros F, Alviola JN, Tilley M, Chen YR, Pierucci VRM and Rooney LW, Predicting hot-press wheat tortilla quality using flour, dough and gluten properties. J Cereal Sci 52: 288-294 (2010).
10. Dinon AZ, Bosco KT and Arisi ACM, Monitoring of Bt11 and Bt176 genetically modified maize in food sold commercially in Brazil from 2005 to 2007. J Sci Food Agric 90: 1566-1569 (2010).
11. Mery D, Chanona-Pérez JJ, Soto A, Aguilera JM, Cipriano A, Veléz-Rivera N, et al, Quality classification of corn tortillas using computer vision. J Food Eng 101: 357-364 (2010).
12. Venturelli MB, Purin B and Pirola M, Maize for the production of polenta flour. Inf Agrario 46: 70-71, 128-129 (1990).
13. Pagliarini E, Monteleone E and Ratti S, Sensory profile of eight tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum) and its relationship to consumer preference. Ital J Food Sci 13: 285-296 (2001).
14. Carbonell I, Izquierdo L and Costell E, Sensory profiling of coke gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): sensory evaluation procedures and panel training. Food Sci Technol Int 8: 169-177 (2002).
15. Brückner B, Schonhof I, Kornelson C and Schrödter R, Multivariate sensory profile of broccoli and cauliflower and consumer preference. Ital J Food Sci 17: 17-32 (2005).
16. Hersleth M, Ilseng MA, Martens M and Naes T, Perception of cheese: a comparison of quality scoring, descriptive analysis and consumer responses. J Food Qual 28: 333-349 (2005).
17. Vilanova M, Zamuz S, Tardàguila J and Masa A, Descriptive analysis of wines from Vitis vinifera cv. Albariño. J Sci Food Agric 88: 819-823 (2008).
18. Hayakawa F, Ukai N, Nishida J, Kazami Y and Kohyama K, Lexicon for the sensory description of French bread in Japan. J Sens Stud 25: 76-93 (2010).
19. Leighton CS, Schonfeldt HC and Kruger R, Quantitative descriptive sensory analysis of five different cultivars of sweet potato to determine sensory and textural profiles. J Sens Stud 25: 2-18 (2010).
20. Tesfaye W, Morales ML, Callejon RM, Cerezo AB, Gonzalez AG, Garcia-Parrilla MC, et al, Descriptive sensory analysis of wine vinegar: tasting procedure and reliability of new attributes. J Sens Stud 25: 216-230 (2010).
21. Lanza CM, Mazzaglia A and Pagliarini E, Sensory profile of a specialty Sicilian chocolate. Ital J Food Sci 23: 36-44 (2011).
22. Pagliarini E, Metodi analitici: Profilo sensoriale, in Valutazioni sensoriali: aspetti teorici, pratici e metodologici. Hoepli, Milan (2002).
23. Meilgaard MC, Civille GV and Carr BT, Sensory Evaluation Techniques (4th edn). CRC Press, New York (2007).
24. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-Methodology-Method of investigating sensitivity of taste. ISO 3972:1991 (1991).
25. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors-Part 1: Selected assessors. ISO 8586/1:1993 (1993).
26. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-Methodology-Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours. ISO 5496:2006 (2006).
27. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors-Part 2: Expert sensory assessors. ISO 8586/2:2008 (2008).
28. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-General guidance for the design of test rooms. ISO 8589:2007 (2007).
29. International Organization for Standardization, Sensory analysis-Identification and selection of descriptors for establishing a sensory profile by a multidimensional approach. ISO 11035:1994 (1994).
30. Gonzàlez RJ, Torres R, de Greef D, Bonaldo A, Robutti J and Borras F, Influence of maize kernel hardness on flour hydration and cooking properties. Arch Latinoam Nutr 55: 354-360 (2005).