Evaluation of the statistical cloud scheme in the ECHAM5 model using satellite data

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Volumn 137, Issue 661, 2011, Pages 2079-2091

  Weber, T ^a,c   Quaas, J ^a,d   Raisanen P ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR METEOROLOGY   (Germany)

^b FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cloud processes; Horizontal cloud variations; Large scale general circulation model; Probability density function; Subgrid scale variability; Total water mixing ratio

Indexed keywords

CLOUD PROCESS; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; HORIZONTAL CLOUD VARIATIONS; PROBABILITY DENSITIES; SUBGRID SCALE; TOTAL WATER MIXING RATIO;

FUNCTION EVALUATION; RADIOMETERS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TROPICS;

PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

ATMOSPHERIC CONVECTION; CLOUD COVER; CLOUD WATER; CONDENSATE; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; MIXING RATIO; MODIS; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SATELLITE DATA; WATER VAPOR;

EID: 83255187277     PISSN: 00359009     EISSN: 1477870X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qj.887     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bechtold P, Cuijpers JWM, Mascart P, Trouilhet P. 1995. Modelling of trade wind cumuli with a low-order turbulence model: Toward a unified description of Cu and Sc clouds in meteorological models. J. Atmos. Sci. 52: 455-463.
2. Bony S, Emanuel KA. 2001. A parametrization of the cloudiness associated with cumulus convection; Evaluation using TOGA COARE data. J. Atmos. Sci. 58: 3158-3183.
3. Bougeault P. 1981. Modeling the trade-wind cumulus boundary layer. Part II: A high-order one-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci. 38: 2429-2439.
4. Chen CT, Roeckner E, Soden BJ. 1996. A comparison of satellite observations and model simulations of column-integrated moisture and upper-tropospheric humidity. J. Climate 9: 1561-1585.
5. Davis A, Marshak A, Wiscombe W, Cahalan R. 1996. Scale invariance of liquid water distributions in marine stratocumulus. Part I: Spectral properties and stationary issues. J. Atmos. Sci. 53: 1538-1558.
6. Gates WL, Boyle JS, Covey C, Dease CG, Doutriaux CM, Drach RS, Fiorino M, Gleckler PJ, Hnilo JJ, Marlais SM, Phillips TJ, Potter GL, Santer BD, Sperber KR, Taylor KE, Williams DN. 1999. An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80: 29-55.
7. Golaz JC, Larson VE, Cotton WR. 2002. A PDF-based model for boundary-layer clouds. Part I: Method and model description. J. Atmos. Sci. 59: 3540-3551.
8. Holz RE, Ackermann SA, Nagle FW, Frey R, Dutcher S, Kuehn RE, Vaughan M, Baum B. 2008. Global moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) cloud detection and height evaluation using (CALIOP). J. Geophys. Res. 113: 1-17. DOI:10.1029/2008JD 009837.
9. King MD, Tsay SC, Platnick SE, Wang M, Liou KN. 1997. 'Cloud retrieval algorithms for MODIS: Optical thickness, effective particle radius and thermodynamic phase', MODIS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document No. ATBD-MOD-05: 1-79..
10. King MD, Menzel WP, Kaufman YJ, Tanré D, Gao BC, Platnick S, Ackerman SA, Remer LA, Pincus R, Hubanks PA. 2003. Cloud and aerosol properties, precipitable water, and profiles of temperature and water vapour from MODIS. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41: 442-458.
11. Kotarba A. 2010. Estimation of fractional cloud cover for Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer/Terra cloud mask classes with high-resolution over ocean ASTER observations. J. Geophys. Res. 115: 1-11. DOI:10.1029/2009JD013520.
12. Kuwano-Yoshida A, Enomoto T, Ohfuchi W. 2010. An improved PDF cloud scheme for climate simulations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136: 1583-1597.
13. LeTreut H, Li ZX. 1991. Sensitivity of an atmospheric general circulation model to prescribed SST changes: Feedback effects associated with the simulation of cloud optical properties. Clim. Dyn. 5: 175-187.
14. Lohmann U, Roeckner E. 1996. Design and performance of a new cloud microphysics scheme developed for the ECHAM general circulation model. Clim. Dyn. 12: 557-572.
15. Mellor GL. 1977. The Gaussian cloud relations. J. Atmos. Sci. 34: 356-358.
16. Nishizawa K. 2000. Parametrization of nonconvective condensation for low-resolution climate models: Comparison of diagnostic schemes for fractional cloud cover and cloud water content. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn 78: 1-12.
17. Pincus R, Klein SA. 2000. Unresolved spatial variability and microphysical process rates in large-scale models. J. Geophys. Res. 105: 27059-27065.
18. Pincus R, Hemler R, Klein SA. 2006. Using stochastically generated subcolumns to represent cloud structure in a large-scale model. Mon. Weather Rev. 134: 3644-3656.
19. Platnick S, King MD, Ackerman SA, Menzel WP, Baum BA, Riédi JC, Frey RA. 2003. The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41: 459-473.
20. Price JD. 2001. A study of probability distributions of boundary-layer humidity and associated errors in parametrized cloud-fraction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 127: 739-758.
21. Räisänen P, Barker HW, Khairoutdinov MF, Li J, Randall DA. 2004. Stochastic generation of subgrid-scale cloudy columns for large-scale models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130: 2047-2067. DOI:10.1256/ qj.03.99.
22. Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A. 2003. 'The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 part I: Model description', Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Report No. 349. Available from MPI for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
23. Rotstayn LD. 1997. A physically based scheme for the treatment of stratiform clouds and precipitation in large-scale models. I: Description and evaluation of the microphysical processes. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 123: 1227-1282.
24. Seemann SW, Borbas EE, Li J, Menzel WP, Gumley LE. 2006. MODIS atmospheric profile retrieval algorithm theoretical basis document, Version 6: 1-37. Available at.
25. Seethala C, Horváth A. 2010. Global assessment of AMSR-E and MODIS cloud liquid water path retrievals in warm oceanic clouds. J. Geophys. Res. 115: 1-19. DOI:10.1029/2009JD012662.
26. Smith RNB. 1990. A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 116: 435-460.
27. Sommeria G, Deardorff JW. 1977. Subgrid-scale condensation in models of nonprecipitating clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 34: 344-355.
28. Sundqvist H, Berge E, Kristjánsson JE. 1989. Condensation and cloud parametrization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather predicition model. Mon. Weather Rev. 117: 1641-1657.
29. Tompkins AM. 2002. A prognostic parametrization for the subgrid-scale variability of water vapour and clouds in large-scale models and its use to diagnose cloud cover. J. Atmos. Sci. 59: 1917-1942.
30. Tompkins AM. 2003. Impact of temperature and humidity variability on cloud cover assessed using aircraft data. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129: 2151-2170. DOI:10.1256/qj.02.190.
31. Tompkins AM. 2008. 'Cloud Parametrization'. In Proceedings of Workshop on Parametrization of Subgrid Physics Processes, Reading, UK, 1-4, September 2008. ECMWF: Reading, UK..
32. Watanabe M, Emori S, Satoh M, Miura H. 2009. A PDF-based hybrid prognostic cloud scheme for general circulation models. Clim. Dyn. 33: 795-816. DOI:10.1007/s00382-008-0489-0.
33. Wood R, Field PR. 2000. Relationships between total water, condensed water, and cloud fraction in stratiform clouds examined using aircraft data. J. Atmos. Sci. 57: 1888-1905.
34. Zhu P, Zuidema P. 2009. On the use of PDF schemes to parametrize sub-grid clouds. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36: 1-5. DOI:10.1029/2008GL03 6817.