Risk determination after an acute myocardial infarction: Review of 3 clinical risk prediction tools

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-41

  Scruth, Elizabeth Ann ^a   Page, Karen ^a   Cheng, Eugene ^b   Campbell, Michelle ^a   Worrall Carter, Linda ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

CADILLAC; GRACE; myocardial infarction; TIMI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; EDUCATION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NURSE; NURSING; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83155189008     PISSN: 08876274     EISSN: 15389782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e31823bfafc     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Clinton MacKinney A, Mueller KJ, McBride TD. The march to accountable care organizationsVhow will rural fare? J Rural Health. 2011;27(1):131-137.
2. Krumholtz HM, Brindis RG, Brush JE, et al. Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council, Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113:456-462. (Pubitemid 43803208)
3. Resnic FS, Welt FG. The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention. J AmColl Cardiol. 2009;53:825-830.
4. Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation: results from an international trial of 9461 patients. Circulation. 2000;101:2557-2567. (Pubitemid 30350632)
5. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, et al. A simple risk index for rapid initial triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an InTIME II sub study. Lancet. 2001;358:1571-1575. (Pubitemid 33101905)
6. Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction: results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. Circulation. 1995;91:1659-1668.
7. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284:835-842. (Pubitemid 30643610)
8. Rathore SS, Weinfurt KP, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Validity of a simple ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction risk index: are randomized trial prognostic estimates generalizable to elderly patients? Circulation. 2003;107:811-816. (Pubitemid 36241037)
9. The GRACE Investigators. Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2001;141:190-199.
10. Eagle KA, Goodman SG, Avezum A, et al. Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Lancet. 2002;359:373-377. (Pubitemid 34158943)
11. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at Presentation. An nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium 11 trial sub study. Circulation. 2000;102:2031-2037.
12. Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore J, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:358-363.
13. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2345-2353. (Pubitemid 37310196)
14. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. GRACE Investigators. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndromes in an international registry. JAMA. 2004;291:2727-2733. (Pubitemid 38725422)
15. Halkin A, Singh M, Nikolsky, et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. The CADILLAC risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1397-1405. (Pubitemid 40615609)
16. Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:957-966. (Pubitemid 34983245)
17. Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. For the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1949-1956. (Pubitemid 30010402)
18. LaSala CA, Connors PA, Taylor Pedro J, Phipps M. The role of the clinical nurse specialist in promoting evidence based practice and effecting positive patient outcomes. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007;38(6):262-270.
19. Yan AT, Yan KS, Tan M, et al. Risk scores for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: useful but simpler is not necessarily better. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(9):1072-1078. (Pubitemid 47343862)
20. Nickolsky E, Aymong ED, Haikin A, et al. Impact of anemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial. J AmColl Cardiol. 2004;44:547-553. (Pubitemid 39078177)
21. Sadeghi HM, Stone GW, Grines CL, et al. Impact of renal insufficiency in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;108:2769-2775. (Pubitemid 37498979)
22. Lev EI, Kornowski R, Vaknin-Asaa H, et al. Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:6-11.
23. Filipiak KJ, Koltowski L, Grabowski M, et al. Prospective comparison of the 5 most popular risk scores in clinical use for unselected patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ J. 2011;75:167-173.
24. Eagle KA, Ginsburg SG, Musunuru K, et al. Identifying patients at high risk of a cardiovascular event in the near future: current status and future directions: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. Circulation. 2010;121(12):1447-1454.
25. Fox AK, Dabbous HO, Goldberg RJ. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observation study (GRACE). BMJ. 2006;25(333):1091-1094. (Pubitemid 44863647)