From image-guided radiotherapy to dose-guided radiotherapy.;De la radiothérapie guidée par l'image à la radiothérapie guidée par la dose

Cancer/Radiotherapie

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 691-698

  Cazoulat, G ^a,b   Lesaunier, M ^a,b   Simon, A ^a,b   Haigron, P ^a,b   Acosta, O ^a,b   Louvel, G ^c   Lafond, C ^a,b,c   Chajon, E ^c   Leseur, J ^c   De Crevoisier, R ^a,b,c  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c CENTRE EUGÈNE MARQUIS   (France)

Author keywords

Dose guided radiotherapy; Image guided radiotherapy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER WALL; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; PAROTID GLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RECTUM;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OROPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 83155181364     PISSN: 12783218     EISSN: 17696658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kantor G., Mahé M.A., Giraud P., Alapetite C., Durdux C., Fourquet A., et al. évaluation nationale de la tomotherapie hélicoidale: description des indications, des contraintes de dose et des seuils de repositionnement. Cancer Radiother 2007, 11:331-337.
2. Lafond C., Jouyaux F., Bellec J., Henry O., Perdrieux M., Chajon E., et al. Quelle RCMI? Du step and shoot au VMAT: point de vue du physicien. Cancer Radiother 2010, 14:539-549.
3. Vieillot S., Fenoglietto P., Moscardo C.L., Aillères N., Lemanski C., Dubois J.B., et al. Quelle radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité? De la technique « step and shoot » à l'arcthérapie, point de vue de l'oncologue radiothérapeute. Cancer Radiother 2010, 14:550-553.
4. Delpon G., Llagostera C., Le Blanc M., Rio E., Supiot S., Mahé M.A., et al. Quelle radiothérapie guidée par l'image pour quels patients? Expérience concomitante de l'utilisation de trois dispositifs d'imagerie de repositionnement dans le cas du cancer de la prostate. Cancer Radiother 2009, 13:399-407.
5. Pommier P., Gassa F., Lafay F., Claude L. Radiothérapie guidée par l'image avec le Cone Beam CT kV (Elekta): expérience du centre Léon-Berard. Cancer Radiother 2009, 13:384-390.
6. Thilmann C., Nill S., Tucking T., Hoss A., Hesse B., Dietrich L., et al. Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences. Radiat Oncol 2006, 1:16.
7. Hansen E.K., Bucci M.K., Quivey J.M., Weinberg V., Xia P., Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 64:355-362.
8. Wu Q., Chi Y., Chen P.Y., Krauss D.J., Yan D., Martinez A. Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009, 75:924-932.
9. Schaly B., Kempe J.A., Bauman G.S., Battista J.J., Van Dyk J. Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:791-805.
10. Yan D., Jaffray D.A., Wong J.W. A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44:665-675.
11. Bzdusek K., Friberger H., Eriksson K., Hardemark B., Robinson D., Kaus M. Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning. Med Phys 2009, 36:2328-2339.
12. Beckendorf V., Guerif S., Le Prise E., Cosset J.M., Lefloch O., Chauvet B., et al. The GETUG 70Gy vs 80Gy randomized trial for localized prostate cancer: feasibility and acute toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60:1056-1065.
13. Zefkili S., Tomsej M., Aletti P., Bidault F., Bridier A., Marchesi V., et al. Recommandations pour un protocole d'assurance de qualité de la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité des cancers de la tête et du cou. Cancer Radiother 2004, 8:364-379.
14. Thirion J.P. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Med Image Anal 1998, 2:243-260.
15. Castadot P., Lee J.A., Parraga A., Geets X., Macq B., Grégoire V. Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol 2008, 89:1-12.
16. Siebers J.V., Zhong H. An energy transfer method for 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation. Med Phys 2008, 35:4096-4105.
17. de Crevoisier R., Chira C., Lafond C., Crouzet L., Simon A., Louvel G., et al. Benefit of IMRT in high dose prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 78:S352-S353.
18. Dijkema T., Raaijmakers C.P., Ten Haken R.K., Roesink J.M., Braam P.M., Houweling A.C., et al. Parotid gland function after radiotherapy: the combined Michigan and Utrecht experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 78:449-453.
19. Pouliot J., Megavoltage imaging megavoltage cone beam CT and dose-guided radiation therapy. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 2007, 40:132-142.
20. Pouliot J., Morin O., Aubin M., Aubry J.F., Chen J., Speight J., et al. Megavoltage cone-beam CT: récents développements et applications cliniques pour la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité. Cancer Radiother 2006, 10:258-268.
21. Keall P.J., Siebers J.V., Joshi S., Mohan R. Monte Carlo as a four-dimensional radiotherapy treatment-planning tool to account for respiratory motion. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:3639-3648.
22. Wu Q., Liang J., Yan D. Application of dose compensation in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:1405-1419.
23. Zhong H., Siebers J.V. Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy. Phys Med Biol 2009, 54:5815-5830.
24. Ahunbay E.E., Peng C., Chen G.P., Narayanan S., Yu C., Lawton C., et al. An on-line replanning scheme for interfractional variations. Med Phys 2008, 35:3607-3615.
25. Lerma F.A., Liu B., Wang Z., Yi B., Amin P., Liu S., et al. Role of image-guided patient repositioning and online planning in localized prostate cancer IMRT. Radiother Oncol 2009, 93:18-24.
26. Janssens G., de Xivry J.O., Fekkes S., Dekker A., Macq B., Lambin P., et al. Evaluation of non-rigid registration models for interfraction dose accumulation in radiotherapy. Med Phys 2009, 36:4268-4276.
27. Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit (ITK) [site Internet]. Disponible à l'adresse: (accès le 1/9/2011). http://www.itk.org/.