Computers and Composition 20/20: A Conversation Piece, or What Some Very Smart People Have to Say about the Future

Computers and Composition

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 327-346

  Walker, Janice R ^a   Blair, Kristine L ^b   Eyman, Douglas ^c   Hart Davidson, Bill ^d   McLeod, Mike ^d   Grabill, Jeff ^d   Kemp, Fred ^e   Palmquist, Mike ^f   Purdy, James P ^g   Sorapure, Madeleine ^h   Tulley, Christine ⁱ   Vitanza, Victor J ^j  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d The WIDE Research Center   (United States)

^e TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^g DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY   (United States)

^j CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Writing, teaching writing, writing assessment, publishing, robots, mobility, literacy, Web 3.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 83155180223     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2011.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson Daniel The low bridge to high benefits: Entry-level multimedia, literacies, and motivation. Computers and Composition 2008, 25(1):40-60.
2. Anderson Daniel, Atkins Anthony, Ball Cheryl, Millar Krista Homicz, Selfe Cynthia, Selfe Richard Integrating multimodality into composition curricula: Survey methodology and results from a CCCC Research Grant. Composition Studies 2006, 34(2):59-84.
3. Arola Kristen L. The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition 2010, 27(1):4-14.
4. Ball, Cheryl E. (2010). Goldilocks and the three (or four) digital scholarship books; or, reconceptualizing a role for digital media scholarship in an age of digital scholarship: A review webtext. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 15(1). Retrieved from http://technorhetoric.com/15.1/reviews/ball/index.html.
5. Ball, Cheryl E., & Moeller, Ryan M. (2008). Converging the ASS[umptions] between U and ME; or how new media can bridge a scholarly/creative split in English studies. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/convergence/media/convergence-FINAL.pdf.
6. Barbarella: Queen of the Galaxy. (1968). Director, Roger Vadim. Dino de Laurentiis Cinematografica. Paramount. DVD.
7. Baudrillard Jean Revenge of the crystal 1990, Pluto Press, London.
8. Berners-Lee Tim Information management: A proposal 1989, CERN, Geneva, Retrieved from http://info.cern.ch/Proposal.html.
9. Blair Kristine, Monske Elizabeth Cui bono? Revisiting the promises and perils of online learning. Computers and Composition 2003, 20(4):441-453.
10. Blair Kristine, Hoy Cheryl Paying attention to adult learners online. Computers and Composition 2006, 23(1):32-48.
11. Blum Susan D. My word! Plagiarism and college culture 2009, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
12. Buzzetto-More Nicole, Sweat-Guy Robert Digital natives: Exploring the technology experiences and uses of the millennium generation. Journal of Global Information Technology 2007, 1(12):78-87.
13. Day, Michael, McClure, Randall, & Palmquist, Michael (2009). Composition in the freeware age: Assessing the impact and value of the Web 2.0 Movement in the teaching of writing. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/Ed_Welcome_Fall_09/compinfreewareintroduction.htm.
14. Desmet Christy, Church Miller Deborah, Griffin June, Balthazor Ron, Cummings Robert E. Reflection, revision, and assessment in first-year composition e-portfolios. Journal of General Education 2008, 57(1):15-30.
15. DeVoss Dánielle Nicole, Eideman-Aadahl Elyse, Hicks G Troy Because digital writing matters: Improving student writing in online and multimedia environments 2010, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
16. DiNucci, Darcy (1999, April). Fragmented future. Design & New Media, 53(4), 221-222. Retrieved from http://www.tothepoint.com/index.html.
17. Dourish Paul Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Eisenstein Elizabeth L. The printing press as an agent of social change 1980, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Eng, Joseph (2006). Embracing the exit: Assessment, trust, and the teaching of writing. Composition Forum, 16. Retrieved 30 Aug. 2009 from http://compositionforum.com/issue/16/embracing-exit.php.
20. Feller, Joseph (n.d.) The Web as platform: What does it mean? Retrieved from http://www.cutter.com/content-and-analysis/resource-centers/business-technology-trends/sample-our-research/bttu0902.html.
21. Freud Sigmund Beyond the pleasure principle. The standard edition 1955, Volume XVIII. The Hogarth Press, London, pp. 7-66.
22. Grabill Jeff, Pigg Stacey, et al. The writing lives of college students 2010, Writing in Digital Environments Research Center, East Lansing, MI, Retrieved from http://compositionawebb.pbworks.com/f/whitepaper.pdf.
23. Hall Gary Digitize this book!: The politics of new media, or why we need open access now 2008, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
24. Hargittai Eszter, Fullerton Lindsay, Menchen-Trevino Ericka, Thomas Kristin Yates Trust online: Young adults' evaluation of Web content. International Journal of Communication 2010, 4:468-494.
25. Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s 1991, NCTE, Urbana. G.E. Hawisher, C.L. Selfe (Eds.).
26. Head Alison J. Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research?. First Monday 2007, 12(8). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/head/index.html.
27. Johnson Glenn, DiBiase David Keeping the cart before the horse: Penn State's E-Portfolio Initiative. Educause Quarterly 2004, 4:18-26.
28. Johnson-Eilola Johndan Little Machines: Understanding users understanding interfaces. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation 2001, 25(4):119-127.
29. Kelly, Kevin (2010, September 16). Achieving techno-literacy. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19FOB-WWLN-Kelly-t.html.
30. Koehler Matthew.J., Mishra Punya Art from randomness: How Inverso uses chance to create haiku. Interactive Multimedia Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning 2002, 4(1). Retrieved from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2002/1/03/index.asp.
31. Kress Gunther Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic age 1998, 53-79. Routledge, London. I. Snyder (Ed.).
32. Lanham Richard A. The economics of attention: Style and Substance in the age of information 2006, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
33. Lenhart, Amanda, Purcell, Kristen, Smith, Aaron, & Zickuhr, Kathryn (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf.
34. Lenhart, Amanda, Arafeh, Sousan, Smith, Aaron, & Magill, Alexandra Rankin (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.
35. Lyotard, Jean-François. (1991). Can thought go on without a body? The Inhuman (pp. 8-23). Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
36. Miller Carolyn Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 1984, 70:151-176.
37. Nancy Jean-Luc. Corpus 2006, éditions Métailié, Paris.
38. Negroponte Nicholas Being Digital 1996, Vingate Books, New York.
39. Palmquist, Mike (2003, March 19). New venues for academic publishing: From cooperative publishing ventures to collaborative Web sites. Plenary Presentation, Research Network Forum. Presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New York.
40. Palmquist, Mike, Kiefer, Kate, & Salahub, Jill (2009). Sustaining (and growing) a pedagogical writing environment: An activity theory analysis. In Dànielle Nicole DeVoss, Heidi A. McKee, & Richard (Dickie) Selfe (Eds.), Technological ecologies and sustainability. Logan, Utah: Computers and Composition Digital Press. Available at http://ccdigitalpress.org/tes/13_palmquist_kiefer_salahub.pdf.
41. Palmquist Mike, Mullin Joan, Blalock Glenn The role of activity analysis in writing research: Case studies of emerging scholarly communities. Pragmatics, problematics, and possibilities: Reflections on contemporary writing research 2011, Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah. L. Nickoson, M.P. Sheridan-Rabideau (Eds.).
42. Pike Kenneth Linguistic concepts 1982, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
43. Prensky Marc Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 2001, 9(5):1-6.
44. Prensky Marc Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning 2010, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
45. Purdy, James P. (under review). Scholarliness as other: How students explain their research-writing behaviors. Millennials and the academy: Exploring and enriching the research and writing practices of NextGen students.
46. Purdy, James P., & Walker, Joyce R. (forthcoming). Scholarship on the move: A rhetorical analysis of scholarly activity in digital spaces. In Debra Journet, Cheryl E. Ball, & Ryan Trauman (Eds.), The new work of composing. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press and Utah State University Press.
47. Purdy James P., Walker Joyce R. Valuing digital scholarship: Exploring the changing realities of intellectual work. Profession 2010, 177-195.
48. Ronell Avital Finitude's score: Essays for the end of the millennium 1994, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
49. Schryer Catherine Records as genre. Written Communication 1993, 10:200-234.
50. Selber Stuart Institutional dimensions of academic computing. College Composition and Communication 2009, 61(1):10-34.
51. Selfe Cynthia Students who teach us. Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition 2004, 43-66. Utah State University Press, Logan, UT. A. Wysocki, J. Johnson-Eilola, C.L. Selfe, G. Sirc (Eds.).
52. Shirky Clay Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age 2010, Penguin Press, New York.
53. Slatin John M. The art of ALT: Toward a more accessible Web. Computers and Composition 2001, 18:73-81.
54. Tenopir, Carol, & King, Donald W. (2008). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. D-Lib, 14(11/12). doi:10.1045/november2008-tenopir. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/tenopir/11tenopir.html.
55. Terminator III. Rise of the Machines. (2003). Director, Jonathan Mostow. Warner Brothers. DVD.
56. West, Richard E., Waddoups, Greg, & Graham, Charles Rise of the Machines. (2003). Direct (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Education Technology, Research & Development, 55(1), 1-26.
57. Zdenek, Sean (2009). Accessible podcasting: College students on the margins in the new media classroom. Computers and Composition Online. Special issue on Composition in the freeware age: Assessing the impact and value of the Web 2.0 movement in the teaching of writing. Retrieved from http://seanzdenek.com/?page_id=22.