Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 1037-1042

  Kawase, Tetsuaki ^a,b   Maki, Atsuko ^b   Kanno, Akitake ^a,c   Nakasato, Nobukazu ^a,b   Sato, Mika ^b   Kobayashi, Toshimitsu ^b  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c KOHNAN HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

40Hz; Auditory steady state response; Contralateral noise; Magnetoencephalography; Masking

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY EVOKED FIELD; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STEADY STATE FIELD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MONAURAL HEARING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; WHITE NOISE;

ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE NET; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 83055188043     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.108     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aoyagi M., Suzuki Y., Yokota M., Furuse H., Watanabe T., Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiol. Neurootol. 1999, 4:28-37.
2. Bertoli S., Smurzynski J., Probst R. Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2005, 6:207-222.
3. Burkard R.F., Sims D. The human auditory brainstem response to high click rates: aging effects. Am. J. Audiol. 2001, 10:53-61.
4. Dallos P., Cheatham M.A. Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 59:591-597.
5. Delgutte B. Physiological models for basic auditory percepts. Auditory computation 1996, 157-220. Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg. H.L. Hawkins, T.A. McMullen, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
6. Engelien A., Schulz M., Ross B., Arolt V., Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear. Res. 2000, 148:153-160.
7. Fujiki N., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: a new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:RC205.
8. Galambos R., Makeig S. Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-Hz steady-state response. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 92:2683-2690.
9. Galambos R., Makeig S. Physiological studies of central masking in man. II: Tonepip SSRs and the masking level difference. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 92:2691-2697.
10. Hari R., Mäkelä J.P. Modification of neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex by masking sounds. Exp. Brain Res. 1988, 71:87-92.
11. Hari R., Aittoniemi K., Jarvinen M.J., Katila T., Varpula T. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain: Localization of neural generators. Exp. Brain Res. 1980, 40:237-240.
12. Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., Picton T.W. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 2002, 15:69-86.
13. Ishida I.M., Stapells D.R. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?. Ear Hear. 2009, 30:713-715.
14. John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear. 2002, 23:106-117.
15. Johnsrude I.S., Penhune V.B., Zatorre R.J. Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. Brain 2000, 123:155-163.
16. Kaneko K., Fujiki N., Hari R. Binaural interaction in the human auditory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic frequency tagging: no effect of stimulus intensity. Hear. Res. 2003, 183:1-6.
17. Kanno A., Nakasato N., Fujita S., Seki K., Kawamura T., Ohtomo S., Fujiwara S., Yoshimoto T. Right hemispheric dominance in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 1996, 47:129-132.
18. Kanno A., Nakasato N., Murayama N., Yoshimoto T. Middle and long latency peak sources in auditory evoked magnetic fields for tone bursts in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 293:187-190.
19. Kuwada S., Batra R., Maher V.L. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear. Res. 1986, 21:179-192.
20. Mäkelä J.P., Hari R. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1987, 66:539-546.
21. Maki A., Kawase T., Kobayashi T. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear. 2009, 30:584-589.
22. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24:375-425.
23. Nakasato N., Fujita S., Seki K., Kawamura T., Matani A., Tamura I., Fujiwara S., Yoshimoto T. Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 94:183-190.
24. Nakasato N., Kumabe T., Kanno A., Ohtomo S., Mizoi K., Yoshimoto T. Neuromagnetic evaluation of cortical auditory function in patients with temporal lobe tumors. J. Neurosurg. 1997, 86:610-618.
25. Okamoto H., Kakigi R., Gunji A., Kubo T., Pantev C. The dependence of the auditory evoked N1m decrement on the bandwidth of preceding notch-filtered noise. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 21:1957-1961.
26. Okamoto H., Stracke H., Ross B., Kakigi R., Pantev C. Left hemispheric dominance during auditory processing in a noisy environment. BMC Biol. 2007, 5:52.
27. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
28. Pantev C., Lutkenhoner B., Hoke M., Lehnertz K. Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology 1986, 25:54-61.
29. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lutkenhoner B., Fahrendorf G., Stober U. Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 75:173-184.
30. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Elbert T., Ross B., Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear. Res. 1996, 101:62-74.
31. Pastor M.A., Artieda J., Arbizu J., Marti-Climent J.M., Peñuelas I., Masdeu J.C. Activation of human cerebral and cerebellar cortex by auditory stimulation at 40Hz. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:10501-10506.
32. Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42:177-219.
33. Reite M., Adams M., Simon J., Teale P., Sheeder J., Richardoson D., Grabbe R. Auditory M100 component 1: relationship to Heschl's gyri. Cogn. Brain Res. 1994, 2:13-20.
34. Ross B., Borgmann C., Draganova R., Roberts L.E., Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:679-691.
35. Ross B., Herdman A.T., Pantev C. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:4082-4093.
36. Ross B., Herdman A.T., Pantev C. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:2029-2039.
37. Samson S., Zatorre R.J. Contribution of the right temporal lobe to musical timbre discrimination. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:231-240.
38. Sasaki T., Kawase T., Nakasato N., Kanno A., Ogura M., Tominaga T., Kobayashi T. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking. Neuroimage 2005, 25:684-689.
39. Schönwiesner M., Krumbholz K., Rübsamen R., Fink G.R., von Cramon D.Y. Hemispheric asymmetry for auditory processing in the human auditory brain stem, thalamus, and cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:492-499.
40. Wong W.Y.S., Stapells D.R. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study. Ear Hear. 2004, 25:57-67.
41. Zatorre R.J. Pitch perception of complex tones and human temporal-lobe function. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 84:566-572.
42. Zwislocki J.J. A theory of central auditory masking and its partial validation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1972, 52:644-659.
43. Zwislocki J.J. Masking: Experimental and theoretical aspects of simultaneous, forward, backward, and central masking. Handbook of perception, volume IV, hearing 1978, 283-336. Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London. E.C. Carterette, M.P. Friedman (Eds.).