Patent query reduction using pseudo relevance feedback

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1953-1956

  Ganguly, Debasis ^a   Leveling, Johannes ^a   Magdy, Walid ^a   Jones, Gareth J F ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

patent search; pseudo relevance feedback; query reduction

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE MODELING; OPTIMAL QUERY; PATENT APPLICATIONS; PATENT SEARCH; PRIOR ART SEARCH; PSEUDO RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; PSEUDO-RELEVANCE FEEDBACKS; REDUCTION ALGORITHMS; REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; TEXT SEGMENTS; WEB SEARCHES;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FEEDBACK; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; STANDARDS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 83055186798     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2063576.2063863     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Cronen-Townsend, Y. Zhou, and W. B. Croft. A framework for selective query expansion. In CIKM 2004, pages 236-237. ACM, 2004.
2. A. Fujii. Enhancing patent retrieval by citation analysis. In SIGIR, pages 793-794. ACM, 2007.
3. D. Hiemstra. Using Language Models for Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Center of Telematics and Information Technology, AE Enschede, 2000.
4. H. Itoh, H. Mano, and Y. Ogawa. Term distillation in patent retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACL-2003 workshop on Patent corpus processing - Volume 20, pages 41-45, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2003.
5. K. Kishida. Experiment on pseudo relevance feedback method using taylor formula at NTCIR-3 patent retrieval task. In NTCIR-3, 2003.
6. V. Lavrenko and B. W. Croft. Relevance based language models. In SIGIR 2001, pages 120-127. ACM, 2001.
7. W. Magdy and G. J. Jones. PRES: a score metric for evaluating recall-oriented information retrieval applications. In SIGIR 2010, pages 611-618, 2010.
8. W. Magdy, J. Leveling, and G. J. F. Jones. Exploring structured documents and query formulation techniques for patent retrieval. In CLEF-2009, pages 410-417, 2010.
9. W. Magdy, P. Lopez, and G. J. F. Jones. Simple vs. sophisticated approaches for patent prior-art search. In ECIR, pages 725-728, 2011.
10. M. F. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3):130-137, 1980.
11. T. Takaki. Query terms extraction from patent document for invalidity search. In NTCIR-5, 2005.
12. H. Takuechi, N. Uramoto, and K. Takeda. Experiments on patent retrieval at NTCIR-5 workshop. In NTCIR-5, 2005.
13. E. L. Terra and R. Warren. Poison pills: harmful relevant documents in feedback. In CIKM 2005, pages 319-320. ACM, 2005.
14. M. Z. Wanagiri and M. Adriani. Prior art retrieval using various patent document fields contents. In CLEF-2010 (Notebook Papers/LABs/Workshops), 2010.
15. R. H. Warren and T. Liu. A review of relevance feedback experiments at the 2003 Reliable Information Access (RIA) workshop. In SIGIR 2004, pages 570-571. ACM, 2004.
16. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the effectiveness of informational retrieval with Local Context Analysis. ACM Transactions on information systems, 18:79-112, 2000.
17. X. Xue and W. B. Croft. Transforming patents into prior-art queries. In SIGIR, pages 808-809, 2009.