Macroecological drivers of alien conifer naturalizations worldwide

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1076-1084

  Essl, Franz ^a,b   Mang, Thomas ^c,d   Dullinger, Stefan ^c   Moser, Dietmar ^b   Hulme, Philip E ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b ENVIRONMENT AGENCY AUSTRIA   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d Vienna Inst for Nature Conservation and Analyses   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; CONIFEROUS TREE; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTRY MODELING; INVASIVE SPECIES; MACROECOLOGY; NATURAL ENEMY; NATURALIZATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT; TROPICAL REGION;

CONIFEROPHYTA; CUPRESSACEAE; PINACEAE;

EID: 83055179748     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06943.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Bates, D. et al. 2011. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes .
2. Blackburn, T. M. and Duncan, R. P. 2001. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414: 195-197.
3. Bolker, B. M. et al. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 127-135.
4. Breckle, S. 1999. Walter's vegetation of the earth. E. Ulmer.
5. CABI Publishing. 2002. Pines of silvicultural importance. Compiled from the Forestry compendium. CAB International.
6. Carillo-Gavilan, M. A. and Vilà, M. 2010. Little evidence of invasion by alien conifers in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 16: 203-213.
7. Cassey, P. et al. 2004. Global patterns of introduction effort and establishment success in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 217: 405-408.
8. CIA. 2009. The world factbook 2009. Central Intelligence Agency, WA.
9. DAISIE. 2009. Delivering alien invasive species inventories for Europe .
10. Dalmazzone, S. 2000. Economic factors affecting vulnerability to biological invasions. - In: Perrings, C. et al (eds), The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar, pp. 17-30.
11. Dawson, W. et al. 2009. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J. Ecol. 97: 657-665.
12. Dickie, I. A. et al. 2010. Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 187: 475-484.
13. Diez, J. M. et al. 2008. Darwin's naturalisation conundrum: dissecting phylogenetic patterns of species invasion. Ecol. Lett. 11: 674-681.
14. Diez, J. M. et al. 2009. Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. Ecol. Lett. 12: 174-1183.
15. Essl, F. et al. 2010. Selection for commercial forestry determines global patterns of alien conifer invasions. Divers. Distrib. 16: 911-921.
16. Essl, F. et al. 2011. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 203-207.
17. Evans, J. 2009. Planted forests: uses, impacts and sustainability. CABI.
18. Faraway, J. J. 2006. Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman and Hall.
19. FNA Editorial Committee. 1993. Flora of North America. North of Mexico. Volume 2: Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms. Oxford Univ. Press.
20. Frodin, D. 2001. Guide to standard floras of the world. Cambridge Univ. Press.
21. Gordon, D. R. et al. 2008. Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Divers. Distrib. 14: 234-232.
22. Gravuer, K. et al. 2008. Strong human association with plant invasion success for Trifolium introductions to New Zealand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 6344-6349.
23. Grotkopp, E. et al. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species. Am. Nat. 159: 396-419.
24. Hijmans, R. J. et al. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim. 25: 1965-1978.
25. Hulme, P. E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalisation. J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 10-18.
26. Hulme, P. E. 2011. Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 168-174.
27. Hulme, P. E. et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 303-341.
28. Jeschke, J. M. 2008. Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds. Divers. Distrib. 14: 913-916.
29. Jeschke, J. M. and Strayer, D. L. 2005. Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102: 7198-7202.
30. Křivánek, M. et al. 2006. Planting history and propagule pressure as predictors of invasion by woody species in a temperate region. Conserv. Biol. 20: 1487-1498.
31. Kueffer, C. et al. 2010. A global comparison of plant invasions on oceanic islands. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 12: 145-161.
32. Lambdon, P. W. et al. 2008. How do introduction characteristics influence the invasion success of Mediterranean alien plants?. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 10: 143-159.
33. Levine, J. M. and D'Antonio, C. M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversiy and invisibility. Oikos 87: 15-26.
34. Lockwood, J. L. et al. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 223-228.
35. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522-1536.
36. Mack, R. N. 2003. Phylogenetic constraints, absent life forms, and preadapted alien plants: a prescription for biological invasions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 185-196.
37. McGeoch, M. A. et al. 2010. Global indicators of biological invasion: species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 16: 95-108.
38. Montgomery, D. C. et al. 2001. Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd ed. Wiley.
39. Mortensen, S. G. and Mack, R. N. 2006. The fate of alien conifers in long-term plantings in the USA. Divers. Distrib. 12: 456-466.
40. Nuñez, M. A. et al. 2009. Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology 90: 2352-2359.
41. Perrings, C. et al. 2010. Bioinvasions and globalization: ecology, economics, management, and policy. Oxford Univ. Press.
42. Price, R. A. et al. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. - In: Richardson, D. M. (ed.), Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 49-68.
43. Pyšek, P. et al. 2009. Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90: 2734-2744.
44. Pyšek, P. et al. 2010. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 12157-12162.
45. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria .
46. Rejmanek, M. and Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive?. Ecology 77: 1655-1661.
47. Richardson, D. M. 1997. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv. Biol. 12: 18-26.
48. Richardson, D. M. (ed.), Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge Univ. Press 1998a.
49. Richardson, D. M. 1998b. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv. Biol. 12: 18-26.
50. Richardson, D. M. and Higgins, S. I. 1998. Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. - In: Richardson, D. M. (ed.), Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 450-473.
51. Richardson, D. M. and Rejmánek, M. 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Divers. Distrib. 10: 321-331.
52. Richardson, D. M. et al. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6: 93-107.
53. Rouget, M. et al. 2002. Commercially important trees as invasive aliens - towards spatially explicit risk assessment at a national scale. Biol. Invasions 4: 397-412.
54. Ruesink, J. L. 2005. Global analysis of factors affecting the outcome of freshwater fish introductions. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1883-1893.
55. Sax, D. F. and Gaines, S. D. 2008. Species invasions and extinction: the future of native biodiversity on islands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 11490-11497.
56. Schwartz, M. W. et al. 2006. The promise and the potential consequences of the global transport of mycorrhizal fungal inoculum. Ecol. Lett. 9: 501-515.
57. Shea, K. and Chesson, P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 170-176.
58. Simberloff, D. et al. 2009. Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other Southern Hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol. 35: 489-504.
59. Stohlgren, T. J. et al. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 25-46.
60. Taylor, B. W. and Irwin, R. E. 2004. Linking economic activities to the distribution of exotic plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 17725-17730.
61. The Gymnosperm database. 2009. , accessed 3 April 2009.
62. Thuiller, W. et al. 2005. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting risk of alien plant invasion at a global scale. Global Change Biol. 11: 2234-2250.
63. Thuiller, W. et al. 2010. Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16: 461-474.
64. Tutin, T. G. et al. 1964. Flora Europaea. Vol. I. Cambridge Univ. Press.
65. USDA Forest Service. 1965. Silvics of North America: conifers , accessed 15 March 2009.
66. USDA. 2009. USDA plants database , accessed 3 March 2009.
67. Walter, H. and Breckle, S.-W. 1991. Ökologie der Erde. Band 1: Ökologische Grundlagen in globaler Sicht. G. Fischer.
68. Wardle, P. 1985. New Zealand timberlines. 3. A synthesis. N. Z. J. Bot. 23: 263-271.
69. Weber, E. et al. 2008. Invasive alien plants in China: diversity and ecological insights. Biol. Invasions 10: 1411-1429.
70. Wilson, J. R. U. et al. 2007. Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Divers. Distrib. 13: 11-22.
71. Wu, S. H. et al. 2010. Patterns of plant invasion in China: biogeographic, climatic approaches and anthropogenic effects. Biol. Invasions 12: 2179-2206.