Utility-based multicriteria model for evaluating BOT projects

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 207-218

  Yan, Min Ren ^a   Pong, Cheng Sheng ^b   Lo, Wei ^b  

^a CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

AHP; BOT; Decision support; Evaluation; Multicriteria analysis; Utility

Indexed keywords

EID: 83055179359     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2011.580585     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abdel Aziz, A. M. 2007. Successful delivery of public-private partnerships for a infrastructure development, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 133(12): 918-931.
2. Augenblic, M.; Cluster, B. S. 1990. The build, operate, and transfer (BOT) approach to infrastructure project in developing country. WPS498, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
3. Chao, L. C.; Skibniewski, M. J. 1992. Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 118 (3): 577-593.
4. Cheung, S-O.; Seun, H. C. H.; Ng, S. T. 2002. A Multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection, Construction Management and Economics 20(7): 557-568. doi:10.1080/01446190210157568
5. Construction and Planning Agency of Ministry of Interior (CPAMI). 2007. A Study on Priority Evaluation of Sewerage Rehabilitation. Taipei, Taiwan: Hwang.
6. Construction and Planning Agency of Ministry of Interior (CPAMI). 2003. The Third Phase of Sewerage System Construction, Construction and Planning Agency of Ministry of Interior. (Chinese Version). Taiwan.
7. CRANA Corporation. 2002. Privatization in Egypt. Privatization Coordination Support Unit (PSCU).
8. Dozzi, S. P.; AbouRizk, S. M.; Schroeder, S. L. 1996. Utility-theory model for bid markup decisions, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 122(2): 119-124. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(119)
9. Federal Highway Administration (FHA). 2005. Manual for using public-private partnerships on highway projects. Washington, D. C.: Department of Transportation.
10. Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Evaluating the Changes in Economic and Social Development of Lithuanian Counties by Multiple Criteria Methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 418-436. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436
11. International Development Institute (IDI). 2002. Guidelines for Management of Sewerage Facilities in Developing Countries. Tokyo, Japan.
12. Kumaraswamy, M. M.; Morris, D. A. 2002. Build-operate-transfer-type procurement in Asian Maga projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 128(2): 93-102. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:2(93)
13. Lo, W.; Yan, M. R. 2009. Evaluating qualification-based selection system: a simulation approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management ASCE 135(6): 458-465. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000013
14. Shen, Q.; Lo, K-K.; Wang, Q. 1998. Priority setting in maintenance management: A modified multiatribute approach using analytic hierarchy process, Construction Management and Economics 16(6): 693-702. doi:10.1080/014461998371980
15. Sliogeriene, J.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Bivainis, J.; Seniut, M. 2009. Environment Factors of Energy Companies and their Effect on Value: Analysis Model and Applied Method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 490-521. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.490-521
16. Shevchenko, G.; Ustinovichius, L.; Andruskevicius, A. 2008. Multi-attribute Analysis of Investments Risk Alternatives in Construction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(3): 428-443. doi:10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.428-443
17. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. Guidance on the privatization of federally funded wastewater treatment works. Washington D.C. USA.