Steady-state stiffness of utricular hair cells depends on macular location and hair bundle structure

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2950-2963

  Spoon, Corrie ^a   Moravec, W J ^b   Rowe, M H ^b   Grant, J W ^a   Peterson, E H ^b  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mechanics; Turtle; Utricle

Indexed keywords

GLASS FIBER;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAIR CELL; HEAD MOVEMENT; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; SENSORY NERVE; STEADY STATE; STEREOCILIUM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TURTLE; UTRICLE; VESTIBULAR LABYRINTH; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CHELATING AGENTS; CILIA; EGTAZIC ACID; FEMALE; HAIR CELLS, VESTIBULAR; MALE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REGRESSION (PSYCHOLOGY); SACCULE AND UTRICLE; SUBTILISIN; TURTLES;

EID: 83055179282     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00469.2011     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ashmore JF. The stiffness of the sensory hair bundle of frog saccular hair cells. J Physiol 350: 20P, 1984.
2. Assad JA, Shepherd GMG, Corey DP. Tip-link integrity and mechanical transduction in vertebrate hair cells. Neuron 7: 985-994, 1991.
3. Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Takumida M. Geometrical array of vestibular sensory hair bundle. Acta Otolaryngol 106: 393-403, 1988.
4. Baird RA. Comparative transduction mechanisms of hair cells in the bullfrog utriculus. II. Sensitivity and response dynamics to hair bundle displacement. J Neurophysiol 71: 685-705, 1994.
5. Bashtanov ME, Goodyear RJ, Richardson GP, Russell IJ. The mechanical properties of chick (Gallus domesticus) sensory hair bundles: relative contributions of structures sensitive to calcium chelation and subtilisin treatment. J Physiol 559: 287-299, 2004.
6. Beurg M, Nam JH, Crawford A, Fettiplace R. The actions of calcium on hair bundle mechanics in mammalian cochlear hair cells. Biophys J 94: 2639-2653, 2008.
7. Bishop CM. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.
8. Crawford AC, Fettiplace R. The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J Physiol 364: 359-379, 1985.
9. Davis JL, Xue J, Peterson EH, Grant JW. Layer thickness and curvature effects on utricle deformation in the red ear slider turtle: static and modal analysis. J Vestib Res 17: 145-162, 2007.
10. Denk W, Webb WW, Hudspeth AJ. Mechanical properties of sensory hair bundles are reflected in their Brownian motion measured with a laser differential interferometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 5371-5375, 1989.
11. Eatock RA, Lysakowski A. Mammalian vestibular hair cells. In: Vertebrate Hair Cells, edited by Eatock RA, Fay PR, Popper AN. New York: Springer, 2006, p. 348-442.
12. Eatock RA, Songer JE. Vestibular hair cells and afferents: two channels for head motion signals. Annu Rev Neurosci 34: 501-534, 2011.
13. Eatock RA, Corey DP, Hudspeth AJ. Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci 7: 2821-2836, 1987.
14. Fermin CD, Lychakov DV, Campos A, Hara H, Sondag E, Jones T, Jones S, Taylor M, Meza-Ruiz G, Martin DS. Otoconia biogenesis, phylogeny, composition and functional attributes. Histol Histopathol 13: 1103-1154, 1998.
15. Fettiplace R, Ricci AJ. Mechanoelectrical transduction in auditory hair cells. In: Vertebrate Hair Cells, edited by Eatock RA, Fay PR, Popper AN. New York: Springer, 2006, p. 154-203.
16. Flock A, Strelioff D. Graded and nonlinear mechanical properties of sensory hairs in the mammalian hearing organ. Nature 310: 597-599, 1984.
17. Fontilla MF, Peterson EH. Kinocilia heights on utricular hair cells. Hear Res 145: 8-16, 2000.
18. Furness DN, Hackney CM. The structure and composition of the stereociliary bundle in vertebrate hair cells. In: Vertebrate Hair Cells, edited by Eatock RA, Fay RR, Popper AN. New York: Springer, 2006, p. 95-153.
19. Furness DN, Mahendrasingam S, Ohashi M, Fettiplace R, Hackney CM. The dimensions and composition of stereociliary rootlets in mammalian cochlear hair cells: comparison between high-and low-frequency cells and evidence for a connection to the lateral membrane. J Neurosci 28: 6342-6353, 2008.
20. Géléoc GSG, Lennan GWT, Richardson GP, Kros CJ. A quantitative comparison of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular and auditory hair cells of neonatal mice. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 611-621, 1997.
21. Goodyear R, Richardson G. The ankle-link antigen: an epitope sensitive to calcium chelation associated with the hair cell surface and the calycal processes of photoreceptors. J Neurosci 19: 3761-3772, 1999.
22. Holt JR, Gillespie SKH, Provance DW, Shah K, Shokat KM, Corey DP, Mercer JA, Gillespie PG. A chemical-genetic strategy implicates myosin-1c in adaptation by hair cells. Cell 108: 371-381, 2002.
23. Howard J, Ashmore JF. Stiffness of sensory hair bundles in the sacculus of the frog. Hear Res 23: 93-104, 1986.
24. Howard J, Hudspeth AJ. Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 3064-3068, 1987.
25. Howard J, Hudspeth AJ. Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron 1: 189-199, 1988.
26. Howard J, Roberts WM, Hudspeth AJ. Mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 17: 99-124, 1988.
27. Hudspeth AJ. Making an effort to listen: mechanical amplification in the ear. Neuron 59: 530-545, 2008.
28. Jacobs RA, Hudspeth AJ. Ultrastructural correlates of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's internal ear. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55: 547-562, 1990.
29. Jaramillo F, Hudspeth AJ. Displacement-clamp measurement of the forces exerted by gating springs in the hair bundle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 1330-1334, 1993.
30. Jorgensen JM. The sensory epithelia of the inner ear of two turtles, Testudo graeca L. and Pseudemys scripta. Acta Zool 55: 289-298, 1974.
31. Jorgensen JM. The number and distribution of calyceal hair cells in the inner ear utricular macula of some reptiles. Acta Zool 69: 169-175, 1988.
32. Kachar B, Parakkal M, Fex J. Structural basis for mechanical transduction in the frog vestibular sensory apparatus. I. The otolithic membrane. Hear Res 45: 179-190, 1990.
33. Karavitaki KD, Corey DP. Sliding adhesion confers coherent motion to hair cell stereocilia and parallel gating to transduction channels. J Neurosci 30: 9051-9063, 2010.
34. Kitajiri S, Sakamoto T, Belyantseva IA, Goodyear RJ, Stepanyan R, Fujiwara I, Bird JE, Riazuddin S, Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, Hinshaw JE, Sellers J, Bartles JR, Hammer JA, Richardson GP, Griffith AJ, Frolenkov GI, Friedman TB. Actin-bundling protein TRIOBP forms resilient rootlets of hair cell stereocilia essential for hearing. Cell 141: 786-798, 2010.
35. Kössl M, Richardson GP, Russell IJ. Stereocilia bundle stiffness: effects of neomycin sulphate, A23187 and concanavalin A. Hear Res 44: 217-230, 1990.
36. Kozlov AS, Risler T, Hudspeth AJ. Coherent motion of stereocilia assures the concerted gating of hair-cell transduction channels. Nat Neurosci 10: 87-92, 2007.
37. Lewis ER, Li CW. Hair cell types and distributions in the otolithic and auditory organs of the bullfrog. Brain Res 83: 35-50, 1975.
38. Lewis ER, Leverenz EL, Bialek WS. The Vertebrate Inner Ear. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1985.
39. Li A, Xue J, Peterson EH. Architecture of the mouse utricle: macular organization and hair bundle heights. J Neurophysiol 99: 718-733, 2008.
40. Lim DJ. Morphological and physiological correlates in cochlear and vestibular sensory epithelia. Scan Elec Micro V: 269-276, 1976.
41. Lysakowski A, Goldberg JM. Morphophysiology of the vestibular periphery. In: The Vestibular System, edited by Highstein SM, Fay RR, Popper AN. New York: Springer, 2004, p. 57-152.
42. 2+ concentration on hair-bundle stiffness and gating-spring integrity in hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 11923-11928, 1997.
43. Meyer M, Eatock RA. Transduction in the turtle utricle (Abstract). Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 34: 86, 2011.
44. Moravec WJ, Peterson EH. Differences between stereocilia numbers on type I and type II vestibular hair cells. J Neurophysiol 92: 3153-3160, 2004.
45. Moravec WJ, Spoon C, Grant JW, Peterson EH. Bundle mechanics depend on bundle structure. II. Using artificial neural networks to perform nonlinear statistical analyses (Abstract). Soc Neurosci Abstr 2005: 47.1, 2005.
46. Nayak GD, Ratnayaka HS, Goodyear RJ, Richardson GP. Development of the hair bundle and mechanotransduction. Int J Dev Biol 51: 597-608, 2007.
47. Pickles JO. A model for the mechanics of the stereociliar bundle on acousticolateral hair cells. Hear Res 68: 159-172, 1993.
48. Platt C. The peripheral vestibular system of fishes. In: Fish Neurobiology, edited by Northcutt RG and Davis RE. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1983, p. 89-123.
49. Popper AN, Platt C. Inner ear and lateral line. In: The Physiology of Fishes, edited by Evans DH. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1993, p. 99-136.
50. Ricci AJ, Cochran SL, Rennie KJ, Correia MJ. Vestibular type I and type II hair cells. 2. Morphometric comparisons of dissociated pigeon hair cells. J Vestib Res 7: 407-420, 1997.
51. Ricci AJ, Wu YC, Fettiplace R. The endogenous calcium buffer and the time course of transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 18: 8261-8277, 1998.
52. Ricci AJ, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R. Active hair bundle motion linked to fast transducer adaptation in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci 20: 7131-7142, 2000.
53. Rowe MH, Peterson EH. Autocorrelation analysis of hair bundle structure in the utricle. J Neurophysiol 96: 2653-2669, 2006.
54. Russell IJ, Richardson GP, Kössl M. The responses of cochlear hair cells to tonic displacements of the sensory hair bundle. Hear Res 43: 55-70, 1989.
55. Russell IJ, Kössl M, Richardson GP. Nonlinear mechanical responses of mouse cochlear hair bundles. Proc R Soc Lond B 250: 217-227, 1992.
56. Severinsen SA, Jorgensen JM, Nyengaard JR. Structure and growth of the utricular macula in the inner ear of the slider turtle Trachemys scripta. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4: 505-520, 2003.
57. Spoon C, Grant W. Biomechanics of hair cell kinocilia: experimental measurement of kinocilium shaft stiffness and base rotational stiffness with Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam analysis. J Exp Biol 214: 862-870, 2011.
58. Spoon C, Peterson EH, Grant JW. Bundle mechanics depend on bundle structure in turtle utricle (Abstract). Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 28: 300, 2005.
59. Strelioff D, Flock A. Stiffness of sensory-cell hair bundles in the isolated guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 15: 19-28, 1984.
60. Szymko YM, Dimitri PS, Saunders JC. Stiffness of hair bundles in chick cochlea. Hear Res 59: 241-249, 1992.
61. Vollrath MA, Kwan KY, Corey DP. The micromachinery of mechanotransduction in hair cells. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 339-365, 2007.
62. Wallenberger FT, Watson JC, Hong L. Glass fibers. In ASM Handbook. Vol. 21: Composites, edited by Miracles DB and Donaldson SL. Material Park, OH: ASM International, 2001, p. 27-34.
63. Wilcox RR. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.
64. Xue J, Peterson EH. Spatial patterns in the structure of the otolithic membranes (Abstract). Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 26: 32, 2003.
65. Xue J, Peterson EH. Hair bundle heights in the utricle: differences between macular locations and hair cell types. J Neurophysiol 95: 171-186, 2006.
66. Xue J, Miller I, Peterson EH. Coupling between hair bundles and otoconial membrane in turtle utricle (Abstract). Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstr 30: 326, 2007.
67. Yohai VJ. High breakdown-point and high efficiency estimates for regression. Ann Stat 15: 642-665, 1987.