Developing new technology platforms for new business models: Syngenta's partnership with the University of Manchester

Research Technology Management

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 24-31

  Malik, Khaleel ^a   Georghiou, Luke ^a   Grieve, Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agriscience; Business university partnership; Open innovation; Strategic partnership

Indexed keywords

AGRISCIENCE; BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES; BUSINESS-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP; CORPORATE PARTNERS; CRITICAL MASS; INFORMATICS; INNOVATION CENTERS; NEW BUSINESS MODELS; OPEN INNOVATION; STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP; SYNGENTA; TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS; UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER;

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

INNOVATION;

EID: 83055160853     PISSN: 08956308     EISSN: 19300166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5437/08953608X540124     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arundel, A., and Geuna, A. 2004. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13(6): 559-580.
2. Brostróm, A., McKelvey, M., and Sandstróm, C. 2009. Elite European universities and the R&D subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. In Learning to Compete in European Universities, ed. M. McKelvey and M. Holmen 251-277. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
3. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profi ting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
4. Coombs, R., and Georghiou, L. 2002. A new industrial ecology. Science 296 (19 April): 471.
5. Cui, Z., Loch, C. H., Grossmann, B., and He, R. 2009. Outsourcing innovation. Research-Technology Management 52(6): 54-63.
6. European Commission. 2008. Challenging Europe's Research: Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA). Report of the ERA Expert Group, EUR 23326, DOI 10.2777/39044. Luxembourg: Offi ce for Offi cial Publications of the European Communities.
7. Grieve, B., Bushell, M., Lant, M., Georghiou, L., and Malik, K. 2009. Changing the rules of the game for future agriculture: The university innovation centre model. In PICMET 2009 Conference Proceedings, 288-298. Portland, OR: IEEE.
8. Howells, J., Nedeva, M., and Georghiou, L. 1998. Industry-Academic Links in the UK. Final Report to Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales and the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, HEFCE Ref 98/70. Bristol: HEFCE.
9. Malik, K. 2004. Coordination of technological knowledge fl ows in firms. Journal of Knowledge Management 8(2): 64-72.
10. Nelson, R. R. 2001. Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2): 13-19. (Pubitemid 33809462)
11. Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. 2007. University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4): 259-280.
12. Roessner, D., Ailes, C., Feller, I., and Parker, L. 1998. Impact on industry of participation in NSF's engineering research centers. Research-Technology Management 41(5): 40-44. (Pubitemid 128603190)
13. Rudy, A. P., Coppin, D., Konefal, J., Shaw, B. T., Eyck, T. T., Harris, C., and Busch, L. 2007. Universities in the Age of Corporate Science: The UC Berkeley-Novartis Controversy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. Shane, S. A. 2005. Economic Development through Entrepreneurship: Government, University and Business Linkages. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
15. Sherwood, A. L., and Covin, J. G. 2008. Knowledge acquisition in university-industry alliances: An empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 25(2): 162-179. (Pubitemid 351185309)